Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 12:53 PM, said:
Telas, on 31 July 2012 - 12:49 PM, said:
Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
Wait. If SL was innocent, why didn't he want to vote Kalse?
Ok I'm back on the case. Spilled milk is spilled milk. Fuck. Let's figure it out.
Look, we had to verify the finder reveal, especially since it wasn't D-Day.
As far as the bit I quoted: are you suggesting SL was the symp?
No. That would make Kalse a killer. That would hurt them. Cuz we lynch Kalse, then that would of left one scum.
I was just saying Kalse is the symp. I figured that out soon as he revealed. Just makes no sense for SL to not have wanted to kill a fake finder, if he was Inno, you know?. Just odd.
Are you fucking kidding me? If you think someone is a symp you don't attack the symp, you attack the person they are defending. THAT WAY, you have a chance at catching the killer. There is no fucking point in going after the symp. Lynching the symp won't win us the game, and a symp's CF won't even confirm if we have hit scum. If we have the opportunity to hit a killer we need to take it.
And don't give me this bullshit about knowing Kalse was the symp. That is the saddest backpedalling I've ever seen.
Now you're trying to cast suspicion on those who are questioning you. Wake up sunshine, this is Mafia, this is how it's played.