Mafia 89.75: Happy Never After
#861
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:45 AM
I wont CF finder, I would CF inno, why would the finder show up in the CF?
#862
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:45 AM
Fucking kill Kalse you half- baboons.
Kalse, listen to me. If you're not lying, and we lynch you, we WIN. AND YOU WON IT FOR US.
If you can't agree to that logic, you're a fucking LIAR.
Kalse, listen to me. If you're not lying, and we lynch you, we WIN. AND YOU WON IT FOR US.
If you can't agree to that logic, you're a fucking LIAR.
#863
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:46 AM
#864
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:46 AM
Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 10:43 AM, said:
If he CFs finder, we win. If he CFs Inno, he's obvious symp. We kill Rashan and tellan, only one MIGHT be, not two, we find last killer.
No scenario is better for us that lynching Kalse.
No scenario is better for us that lynching Kalse.
He won't CF finder man, that's not in this game as far as we can tell. The coroner find is rarely that specific.
Think about it. Saying what roles have died takes away the risk of fake revealing as scum, and always worried about killing a revealed finder because of the possibility of a healer.
#865
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:47 AM
Tellan, on 31 July 2012 - 10:44 AM, said:
Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 10:41 AM, said:
Tennes, on 31 July 2012 - 10:35 AM, said:
Sorrit are you the symp?
Are you guys retarded or something?
If he CFs finder WE WIN. GAME OVER. WE LYNCH SL AND KASCHAN NEXT TWO DAYS.
If he's fucking with us, we lynched another innocent. Then we have to kill Rashan and Tellan. May have only covered for one. Still don't know the other.
How is lynching Kalse Not Our best plan? We fucking win if he's finder.
Scum POSSIBLE 3, town 6 tomorow. We can easily kill SL and then Kaschan.
If he's lying and we kill an Inno, its scum 3 possibly, and town 6, but we still have to lynch Rashan and tellan.
And if there not BOTH scum, they fucked us.
Figure it out, dips.
Lynch Kalse.
I see where you're coming from, but in this game, the Coroner Find only includes faction, right? I don't remember seeing 'Roled Innocent' in any of the CFs so far. So there's no guarantee Kalse will CF as finder, he might just CF as town. And in that way, we couldn't tell if he was finder or symp.
This is why I'm voting SL.
Bull shit. Finders ALWAYS CF Finder. If he CFs Inno, your dead Tellan.
Kill Kalse you dips. The two that DONT vote Kalse are the killers.
#866
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:48 AM
#868
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:48 AM
I will cf inno and you will assume im a symp, and then leave SL and kaschan alone guessing I was lying?
and then town loses because of my reveal
and then town loses because of my reveal
#869
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:49 AM
Oh, I forgot you think he's my symp. No wonder you aren't listening.
I'd love for someone to log on and play the effing game.
I'd love for someone to log on and play the effing game.
#870
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:50 AM
when we get shelly's cf we'll know if kalse is lying.
#871
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:52 AM
Oh wow this is interesting. Odd timing but...
remove vote
vote Sheltatha Lore
finders finds are testable
remove vote
vote Sheltatha Lore
finders finds are testable
#872
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:52 AM
Want fucking EXAMPLES. K.
DAMN I LOVE BEING RIGHT.
CARTEL GAME.
DAMN I LOVE BEING RIGHT.
CARTEL GAME.
Path-Shaper, on 19 June 2012 - 05:16 PM, said:
After the swift and gruesome death in town Jose Blanco, ex police officer, goes around to see weather he can find something useful, alas the townspeople see him looking around and feel that maybe he is the murderer.
Korbas is dead. He was Retired Talon and finder(town)
It is Day 1. 1 hour and 13 minutes remaining
13 Players still alive: Ampelas, Anomandaris, Anthras, Atrahal, Driss, Eloth, Fener, Karosis, Korbas, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Omtose
7 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
1 Vote for Ampelas ( Fener )
1 Vote for Anomandaris ( Ampelas )
4 Votes for Korvalain ( Omtose, Driss, Korbas, Anthras )
7 Votes for Korbas ( Anomandaris, Korvalain, Meanas, Eloth, Atrahal, Liosan, Karosis )
It is now night
-Liz
Korbas is dead. He was Retired Talon and finder(town)
It is Day 1. 1 hour and 13 minutes remaining
13 Players still alive: Ampelas, Anomandaris, Anthras, Atrahal, Driss, Eloth, Fener, Karosis, Korbas, Korvalain, Liosan, Meanas, Omtose
7 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
1 Vote for Ampelas ( Fener )
1 Vote for Anomandaris ( Ampelas )
4 Votes for Korvalain ( Omtose, Driss, Korbas, Anthras )
7 Votes for Korbas ( Anomandaris, Korvalain, Meanas, Eloth, Atrahal, Liosan, Karosis )
It is now night
-Liz
#873
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:53 AM
#874
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:53 AM
#875
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:54 AM
IF HE CFS FUCKING FINDER WE WIN. IF HES SCUM, WHY TEST IT LYNCHING ANYONE BUT HIM.
GOD YOU GUYS ARE MORONS.
GOD YOU GUYS ARE MORONS.
#876
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:55 AM
Ok, I'm back. Don't have time to do a full reread like planned, but I guess that is a little less relevant now.
I can kind of see the logic behind Sorrit's suggestion. Kalse's reveal has come somewhat out of the blue, and while it makes sense that you could find both scum and then reveal them both to prevent yourself getting killed before you can find two, I find it difficult to believe that you could find both of them one after the other.
Kalse: What made you choose those two to find?
The main difficulty I have with following Sorrit's lead is that before the reveal he advocated lynching first a low poster and then a duck (the slenderest of signalling cases). Rashan wasn't even one of Sorrit's main picks for scum, but he refused to remove his vote from Rashan. Then Kalse comes on and points to two people, one of which Sorrit has already found suspicious. Now Sorrit is lining up the lynches for either situation, whether we lynch Kalse or not, while advocating the lynch of a possible finder, a lynch that is going to be difficult to achieve. I'm starting to wonder if Sorrit is deliberately sowing confusion.
I can kind of see the logic behind Sorrit's suggestion. Kalse's reveal has come somewhat out of the blue, and while it makes sense that you could find both scum and then reveal them both to prevent yourself getting killed before you can find two, I find it difficult to believe that you could find both of them one after the other.
Kalse: What made you choose those two to find?
The main difficulty I have with following Sorrit's lead is that before the reveal he advocated lynching first a low poster and then a duck (the slenderest of signalling cases). Rashan wasn't even one of Sorrit's main picks for scum, but he refused to remove his vote from Rashan. Then Kalse comes on and points to two people, one of which Sorrit has already found suspicious. Now Sorrit is lining up the lynches for either situation, whether we lynch Kalse or not, while advocating the lynch of a possible finder, a lynch that is going to be difficult to achieve. I'm starting to wonder if Sorrit is deliberately sowing confusion.
#877
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:55 AM
#878
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:57 AM
Sorrit, on 31 July 2012 - 10:54 AM, said:
IF HE CFS FUCKING FINDER WE WIN. IF HES SCUM, WHY TEST IT LYNCHING ANYONE BUT HIM.
GOD YOU GUYS ARE MORONS.
GOD YOU GUYS ARE MORONS.
because you would end up killing town and if we dont get finder showing on the CF we have lost the game because I would of just gave the ducks an iron clad alibi
If you vote for one of the ducks and he shows up town then you lynch me the day after.
and you see who was the most likely target for todays lynch to see who i was defending with my fake claim and you go for them.
#879
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:58 AM
Atrahal, on 31 July 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
Ok, I'm back. Don't have time to do a full reread like planned, but I guess that is a little less relevant now.
I can kind of see the logic behind Sorrit's suggestion. Kalse's reveal has come somewhat out of the blue, and while it makes sense that you could find both scum and then reveal them both to prevent yourself getting killed before you can find two, I find it difficult to believe that you could find both of them one after the other.
Kalse: What made you choose those two to find?
The main difficulty I have with following Sorrit's lead is that before the reveal he advocated lynching first a low poster and then a duck (the slenderest of signalling cases). Rashan wasn't even one of Sorrit's main picks for scum, but he refused to remove his vote from Rashan. Then Kalse comes on and points to two people, one of which Sorrit has already found suspicious. Now Sorrit is lining up the lynches for either situation, whether we lynch Kalse or not, while advocating the lynch of a possible finder, a lynch that is going to be difficult to achieve. I'm starting to wonder if Sorrit is deliberately sowing confusion.
I can kind of see the logic behind Sorrit's suggestion. Kalse's reveal has come somewhat out of the blue, and while it makes sense that you could find both scum and then reveal them both to prevent yourself getting killed before you can find two, I find it difficult to believe that you could find both of them one after the other.
Kalse: What made you choose those two to find?
The main difficulty I have with following Sorrit's lead is that before the reveal he advocated lynching first a low poster and then a duck (the slenderest of signalling cases). Rashan wasn't even one of Sorrit's main picks for scum, but he refused to remove his vote from Rashan. Then Kalse comes on and points to two people, one of which Sorrit has already found suspicious. Now Sorrit is lining up the lynches for either situation, whether we lynch Kalse or not, while advocating the lynch of a possible finder, a lynch that is going to be difficult to achieve. I'm starting to wonder if Sorrit is deliberately sowing confusion.
The point is we don't know if the finder WILL CF as a finder, he may ONLY CF as TOWN, because a full CF isn't always found in low tmdi games. Which is a waste of a lynch which will be proved one way or another by Shelly's CF anyway. No point in complicating it.
#880
Posted 31 July 2012 - 10:58 AM