Anomandaris, on 09 May 2012 - 01:08 AM, said:
I'm willing to test out Karosis' find. Kalse seems to fit the profile of a zombie fairly well, and I had a quick look back over his recent posts and saw one from him yesterday that I think could indicate that Karosis is right:
Kalse, on 07 May 2012 - 06:57 PM, said:
I can't possibly be the only one thinking this: that everything that Rashan's said could as easily apply to him.
If I'm not mistaken, you've just outed yourself as most likely either a faction leader or a zombie. Even without a find on Olar, you'd know he's not on your team, so he'd be safe for you to vote for. Ano's vote had a bit of reasoning behind it which I can see being possible, but you seem a lot more relaxed about throwing your vote down.
The way you were so sure about Mockra being a zombie also points to you either having done a find on him, which again suggests you're another faction leader, or that you threw him to the wolves (seeing that it was a useless alt) in order to PI yourself.
I'm not sure I understand the bit you say about being impossible to NK though? In the OP it doesn't say anything about killers' chances being affected by DR unless one of them is dead?
So Kalse thinks that the leader would know know that Olar was not on his team even without a find. To me this indicates that he has no idea what knowledge human players get about who else is in their faction, because I find it incredibly unlikely that a leader would know all of his followers. There's no point in him having a find, then, is there? And besides, there's too much information in the game if you do it that way, given what everyone else gets.
Vote Kalse
Hehe, I think Ano that you forget that Olar 'revealed' as a leader - thus Rashan, as another leader, would know that he wasn't on the same team as Olar regardless.
Notwithstanding, I think the stronger point is that Kalse defended Olar by attacking Rashan in the first place.