Mentalist, on 29 February 2012 - 10:23 PM, said:
The Dude, on 29 February 2012 - 10:17 PM, said:
Macros, on 29 February 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:
no, I mean you bringing up the only meaningful interaction, writing it off totally as shenanigans then pointing in the complete other directoin in a joking fashion.
THAT is what I mean, justify it bitch
I don't need to justify the fact that the grief/JA interaction is bogus. I think it's pretty obvious. But if you want to continue on with a JA vote that will lead to either Grief or JA being Lynched and coming back inno (which is a very probable outcome). Then by all means, go ahead. Like I said, If it's anything, it's grief being a symp and shitting up the thread.
k
who is he symping?
I have no idea. But the role of a symp is to get the thread pointed in any direction but at his master. I think he has accomplished that by going off on a joke vote.
I'm not saying Grief is a for sure symp, in fact, I stated that it's usual inno day 1 bull shit, in my opinion. But if I had to choose one as scum, I would think Grief the scummier of the 2.
@Stalker I did say that JA's responses were odd. They were, he went back and forth between joke vote/ looking for a reaction. I found that to be odd. Regardless, as I said, imo, day 1 head butting.