[dktorode]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:46 AM, said:

Fair, I misplaced. I apologize.

[Jump Around]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:41 AM, said:

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:

I just re-read the post I quoted from Stalker, which cause me to vote because of the first part.

The second part basically says

"I will now vote for someone I think is scum because we can't afford anymore to lynch a town"

WTF??

More explanation please.

When you put a vote, do you feel the need to specify that you vote for him because a) you think he's scum and b ) lynching scum is good and lynching inno is not?

Sometimes people do say a), but optimally would add reasons why they think that player is scum. But saying b ), I should say it's a new one for me.

That's what I mean by saying Stalker's posts are unnatural and sound very contrived/cautious

[HoosierDaddy]

dktorode, on 05 March 2012 - 09:50 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:46 AM, said:

Fair, I misplaced. I apologize.

That took a lot of back searching to realize. Lol.

[Path-Shaper]

Macros, on 05 March 2012 - 09:18 AM, said:

in the pub, sweating like a pig in a butchers.
i like the idea of lynching obdi.
[b]unvote
voue obdi[b]

I am going to count this. Posting with phone is shit, and I am not a 'broomstick in ass' mod.

It is Day 2. 6 hours and 14 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Bent, Bubba, D'rek, Dktorode, H.D., Jump Around, K0rbas, Macros, Mentalist, Obdigore, Silencer, Stalker

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

1 Vote for D'rek ( H.D. )
2 Votes for Obdigore ( Dktorode, Macros )
1 Vote for Stalker ( Jump Around )
1 Vote for Dktorode ( Obdigore )
1 Vote for Mentalist ( Stalker )

Players not voted: Bent, Bubba, D'rek, K0rbas, Silencer

[HoosierDaddy]

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:41 AM, said:

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:

I just re-read the post I quoted from Stalker, which cause me to vote because of the first part.

The second part basically says

"I will now vote for someone I think is scum because we can't afford anymore to lynch a town"

WTF??

More explanation please.

When you put a vote, do you feel the need to specify that you vote for him because a) you think he's scum and b ) lynching scum is good and lynching inno is not?

Sometimes people do say a), but optimally would add reasons why they think that player is scum. But saying b ), I should say it's a new one for me.

That's what I mean by saying Stalker's posts are unnatural and sound very contrived/cautious

Okay, so they over-rationalize their vote rather than just giving their reason.

[dktorode]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 09:41 AM, said:

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:35 AM, said:

I just re-read the post I quoted from Stalker, which cause me to vote because of the first part.

The second part basically says

"I will now vote for someone I think is scum because we can't afford anymore to lynch a town"

WTF??

More explanation please.

When you put a vote, do you feel the need to specify that you vote for him because a) you think he's scum and b ) lynching scum is good and lynching inno is not?

Sometimes people do say a), but optimally would add reasons why they think that player is scum. But saying b ), I should say it's a new one for me.

That's what I mean by saying Stalker's posts are unnatural and sound very contrived/cautious

Okay, so they over-rationalize their vote rather than just giving their reason.

also feeling of the need to justify like that for no reason on top of how contrived it is...

[dktorode]

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 09:33 AM, said:

dktorode, on 05 March 2012 - 09:10 AM, said:

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 06:52 AM, said:

Why the fuck vig Grief?? There's a step between "I can't be bothered to read carefully enough to realize that there were some recurrent suggestions" and "THEN I'LL VIG SOMEONE NOBODY MENTIONED LOLLOLLOL". Silencer is playing a dog of a game, I would trade Grief back for him anytime.

As for Vengeance, well, he was part of many people's list, including mine. I'm disappointed by the CF, if he was not a killer I really don't think he was a symp.

Stalker, on 05 March 2012 - 05:54 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 05:11 AM, said:

Should've gone with Stalker.... Fuck.

would have gotten the same result, and been just as pissed. My gut has been ment, so I'll place a vote where I am feeling it, cause we can't afford another dead town.


vote Mentalist

Really? One more post by Stalker that creeps the shit out of me

vote Stalker

I cant seem to get a read on stalker...


hmm...maybe thats a bad thing.
I could go that way.


queue the me symping you arguments

It's not only the lack of reading (although there is some of that), it's just that everytime someone hints at a suspicion of him, we get a lament of the woes of the inno team that gets distracted from its noble task by pointing the finger at him (who is, of course, inno)

yea i get that.
thats pretty much why i dont have a reading.

Something else seems to take centre stage. hence the reason he seems to be sliding by my radar.


could be coincidence...there are a few players who are slipping by for me.
I suppose it is up to me to not get so easily distracted to be fair.

[HoosierDaddy]

Part of me wonders if you aren't just playing on my pre-conceived notions to justify a further lynch.

[dktorode]

ooooooo McGuyver is on!!

[dktorode]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:14 AM, said:

Part of me wonders if you aren't just playing on my pre-conceived notions to justify a further lynch.

again.....who are you talking too?

QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE...not that hard man

[HoosierDaddy]

dktorode, on 05 March 2012 - 10:18 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:14 AM, said:

Part of me wonders if you aren't just playing on my pre-conceived notions to justify a further lynch.

again.....who are you talking too?

QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE...not that hard man

Sorry. I'm obviously talking about you and JA. Seriously, you guys are the only ones around. I understand asking for context, but when there is only one context it's kind of redundant to ask for it. However, I'm trying to do better at it.

[dktorode]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:22 AM, said:

dktorode, on 05 March 2012 - 10:18 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:14 AM, said:

Part of me wonders if you aren't just playing on my pre-conceived notions to justify a further lynch.

again.....who are you talking too?

QUOTE QUOTE QUOTE...not that hard man

Sorry. I'm obviously talking about you and JA. Seriously, you guys are the only ones around. I understand asking for context, but when there is only one context it's kind of redundant to ask for it. However, I'm trying to do better at it.

ok..fair enough, for my part i was simply expanding on what JA brought up.
After YOU ASKED FOR IT.

so i dont get what you are geting at.
no...well actually yea i suppose i do understand it, i just dont get it (get it?)....you are saying we are perhaps playing on your feeling towards stalker?
But i have only extrapolated upon your request.
JA could be playing on your sentiment towards stalker i suppose...but then...what for? Not like you have any vigs left.
spose your voice carries more weight...meh...just find it a bit too paranoid i guess.
anybody voices suspicions on your suspects you are going to feel this way from now on then?...eeesh

[HoosierDaddy]

Quote

anybody voices suspicions on your suspects you are going to feel this way from now on then?...eeesh

No, but I'm paranoid about scum using me as a reason to shoe-horn someone into a lynch. So I ask for justifications.

[Jump Around]

Wow, only 6 hours left.

After the vigs reveal fest, I'm not certain we are going anywhere today.

If really a lynch is needed, I'm not against adding to Obdigore. He spammed day 1, disappeared for a bit, then spent a page or two arguing with HD after his vig. All things that take time, effort and attention away from things that could be more useful.

[Jump Around]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

Quote

anybody voices suspicions on your suspects you are going to feel this way from now on then?...eeesh

No, but I'm paranoid about scum using me as a reason to shoe-horn someone into a lynch. So I ask for justifications.

I'm not certain what pre-concieved notions you talk about, it's not like I'm playing on some past grudge you would have with Stalker that I wouldn't even know of.

[dktorode]

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

Quote

anybody voices suspicions on your suspects you are going to feel this way from now on then?...eeesh

No, but I'm paranoid about scum using me as a reason to shoe-horn someone into a lynch. So I ask for justifications.

well look it from my perspective...you ask for an explanation...its given...then you say you feel it could only be us doing it only because you felt that way about him.
seems paranoid to me.

but ok...lets drop it, its neither here nor there really.

[dktorode]

Jump Around, on 05 March 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:

H.D., on 05 March 2012 - 10:36 AM, said:

Quote

anybody voices suspicions on your suspects you are going to feel this way from now on then?...eeesh

No, but I'm paranoid about scum using me as a reason to shoe-horn someone into a lynch. So I ask for justifications.

I'm not certain what pre-concieved notions you talk about, it's not like I'm playing on some past grudge you would have with Stalker that I wouldn't even know of.

i believe stalker was one of his suspects to vig...

[HoosierDaddy]

Remove Vote.

You can get the next one without me. I'm unsure at this point who to trust at all other than Silencer.

[HoosierDaddy]

Eh, I feel sick leaving without putting a vote on someone.

Vote Stalker

Good night.

[dktorode]

jeez...was just going to say...

the more votes we see from people we know to be inno the better.
At least we know your vote is not a scum vote with scum reasoning.
No vote from you would have been a bit of a rubbish move.