Tulas Shorn said:
One thing that I am wondering is that if Sorrit was trying to draw attention away from someone then with Silanah being dead and from the looks of the scene not of the highest importance. Then was he trying to draw attention away from Liosan.
Actually he might have been trying to do that. But then that brings up the question of how would he have known that Atrahal wasn't on his team. Unless he had tried to do something to Antrahal the night before and found out that way. Which could mean several things.
A little conjecture if you will. Based off of this bit from the end of the first night scene.
My motive for bringing up Atrahal? It was my first oppurtunity to go through the thread at length and Atrahal's play was/is bugging me. I'm confused why you all are acting as if we are looking for scum.
With the same level of 'logic' I see a couple of you (Tulas in particular) using, I can deduce the following:
1) GL was correct about the faction setup, and was telling his 'second' that he only knows him, and subtly looking for directions.
2) He refused my suggestions regarding Atrahal, therefore he is protecting Atrahal.
3) Since GL only knows his 'second', then Atrahal is obviously his second.
Terrible logic used to make it look like there are connections is fun.
Now if you want to do something fun, go look at who started speculating on GLs main target, Lio, before he did if you want to find his 'second'.
Or you can lynch Lio. If he ends up being the lynch today or someone can provide a compelling case, I will string him up (but oh no I would say this even if I was on his team! MORE WIFOM!
I'm still curious, Tulas, why you keep bringing up recruiting? Know something the rest of us dont? I'm also curious why you said 'must be sad for team M to not have an alliance.' I don't even know what alliances do. There is no explanation in the setup on what Open Alliances do, just that they exist. Care to enlighten us since you obviously know more about both a recruiting role and alliances than I do?
Edit -> Quote was not what I had meant to quote, fixed it.
This post has been edited by Sorrit: 27 January 2012 - 03:45 AM