[Osseric]

Olar Ethil, on 12 January 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

a lynch will benefit town more than not. we all knwo this. i can stay to hammer if needed. but I don't like the lynch. my gut says scum has played us into lynching him. and if it's unavoidable, at least we can analyze the train after wards. i dunno. i shoud post more. need to buy some beer.

I don't think I disagree with you here. It;s strange.

Go ahead and hammer, sil.

[Kessobahn]

Olar Ethil, on 12 January 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

a lynch will benefit town more than not. we all knwo this. i can stay to hammer if needed. but I don't like the lynch. my gut says scum has played us into lynching him. and if it's unavoidable, at least we can analyze the train after wards. i dunno. i shoud post more. need to buy some beer.

I also need beer.


but it feels like -27 outside, and I'd have to walk for half an hour to get it,

[Okaros]

Olar Ethil, on 12 January 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

a lynch will benefit town more than not. we all knwo this. i can stay to hammer if needed. but I don't like the lynch. my gut says scum has played us into lynching him. and if it's unavoidable, at least we can analyze the train after wards. i dunno. i shoud post more. need to buy some beer.

Yeah, I have that bad feeling I always get when someone i've pointed fingers st is about to be lynched. As you say, there's always the train.

[Silanah]

Running out of time a bit...

I'm going

Vote Atrahal

I thought the cases on Atra have been the strongest made, the reason I've been reluctant to vote for today him is the fact that he's been silenced.

[Kessobahn]

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:04 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:02 PM, said:

Town needs to discuss what's going on.

there are many ares of discussion that are productive to town.


wifom is never one of them.

Keep telling yourself that if that's what you believe. Sure, WIFOM is typically a thing to be avoided, but only people incapable of adaptive thinking (or idiots) make absolute rules in a game as fluid as mafia. Even a healer can find times when revealing becomes necessary (though not this time around).

I agree on reveals. I've revealed as a healer on day 1, once. we ended up winning the game with me alive.

I vehemently disagree on WIFOM though. esp in this case.

the basic premise (lynch a silenced player) I've had nothing against.

but framing it as "this is a day 1 lynch. we usually waste day 1 lynches anyway, so this time, wouldn't it be cool if we tested a theory based entirely on wifom instead" is not a good way to argue it.

[Path-Shaper]

It is Day 2. 11 minutes remaining

12 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn

7 votes to lynch, 6 votes to go to night.

7 Votes for Atrahal ( Sheltatha Lore, Eloth, Sorrit, Osseric, Okaros, Kessobahn, Silanah )
1 Vote for Olar Ethil ( Karatallid )
1 Vote for Karatallid ( Tulas Shorn )

Players not voted: Atrahal, Korlat, Olar Ethil

[Korlat]

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 09:55 PM, said:

You might get all ruffled from the pressure, but in my opinion this is the way to hunt for scum.

Who is ruffled? I am telling you that your current hunch is wrong. Your "pressure" is repeadedly asking the thread what they thought of me. Meh, I am done with you. I only hope your further gut feelings turn out to be more accurate.

How much time is left? Are we pretty much stuck on an atrahal vote?

It's better than some of the others. But I always get that "we're probably wrong" feeling right before a lynch. One thing to keep in mind, there is only 2 scum this game, so probably little resistance when we do get on the right track.

[Sorrit]

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:11 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:04 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:02 PM, said:

Town needs to discuss what's going on.

there are many ares of discussion that are productive to town.


wifom is never one of them.

Keep telling yourself that if that's what you believe. Sure, WIFOM is typically a thing to be avoided, but only people incapable of adaptive thinking (or idiots) make absolute rules in a game as fluid as mafia. Even a healer can find times when revealing becomes necessary (though not this time around).

I agree on reveals. I've revealed as a healer on day 1, once. we ended up winning the game with me alive.

I vehemently disagree on WIFOM though. esp in this case.

the basic premise (lynch a silenced player) I've had nothing against.

but framing it as "this is a day 1 lynch. we usually waste day 1 lynches anyway, so this time, wouldn't it be cool if we tested a theory based entirely on wifom instead" is not a good way to argue it.

But that was not what that lynch was about. Have you still not figured that out?

[Okaros]

A sign of Atra's innocence? He's fingered 2 people who have no votes on them. I'm quite tempted to bekieve Shelly's played us with that ridiculous reveal.

[Path-Shaper]

The day begins on a strange note, as both Osseric and Sheltatha Lore claim mastery of Denul. There is much anger for a while, but somehow the group manages the difficult feat of collectively awkwardly looking away.





says Atrahal.

Slowly the eyes turn towards him
“Who was that?”
“Is Atrahal silenced?”
“Atrahal?”
“You know, after the thing we were saying yesterday about silenced and the Benses that they would know that we would know that they know they would not dare to silence themselves? Well, it applies today, except the other way!”
“Yeah!”
“Get him!”










“Defend yourself!”











....










Atrahal (HiddenOne) has been lynched. He was innocent.


It is now Night. Please send/confirm your night actions.

I'm actually off, way past my bedtime. Vengeance should arrive shortly to hopefully resolve the night

[Kessobahn]

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:11 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:04 PM, said:

Sorrit, on 12 January 2012 - 10:02 PM, said:

Town needs to discuss what's going on.

there are many ares of discussion that are productive to town.


wifom is never one of them.

Keep telling yourself that if that's what you believe. Sure, WIFOM is typically a thing to be avoided, but only people incapable of adaptive thinking (or idiots) make absolute rules in a game as fluid as mafia. Even a healer can find times when revealing becomes necessary (though not this time around).

I agree on reveals. I've revealed as a healer on day 1, once. we ended up winning the game with me alive.

I vehemently disagree on WIFOM though. esp in this case.

the basic premise (lynch a silenced player) I've had nothing against.

but framing it as "this is a day 1 lynch. we usually waste day 1 lynches anyway, so this time, wouldn't it be cool if we tested a theory based entirely on wifom instead" is not a good way to argue it.

But that was not what that lynch was about. Have you still not figured that out?

that's exactly what the lynch was about. do I have to find for you the many Osseric quotes?

[Korlat]

Okaros, on 12 January 2012 - 10:09 PM, said:

Olar Ethil, on 12 January 2012 - 10:06 PM, said:

a lynch will benefit town more than not. we all knwo this. i can stay to hammer if needed. but I don't like the lynch. my gut says scum has played us into lynching him. and if it's unavoidable, at least we can analyze the train after wards. i dunno. i shoud post more. need to buy some beer.

Yeah, I have that bad feeling I always get when someone i've pointed fingers st is about to be lynched. As you say, there's always the train.

Wow, thats spooky. I said almost the exact same thing in a x-post.

[Kessobahn]

loving the PS picture-commentary, btw.

[Silanah]

P-S's comments are hilarious

[Osseric]

SORRIT AND KESSO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

No anger here, but I'd really like you two to stop arguing about it. It doesn't matter anymore.

Okay, now that I've said that... I have another opinion. I don't care that it's night, because I tend to forget things when I don't post them right away and I might be silenced tomorrow.

No guarantees here, but this seems like a pretty good case of Okaros setting up tomorrow's lynch.

Okaros, on 12 January 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

A sign of Atra's innocence? He's fingered 2 people who have no votes on them. I'm quite tempted to bekieve Shelly's played us with that ridiculous reveal.

He also set up today's lynch, with Atra being innocent. Btw, I like the picture scenes, quite funny.

Am I off base here, or does that seem suspicious?

[Sorrit]

Osseric, on 12 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:

SORRIT AND KESSO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

No anger here, but I'd really like you two to stop arguing about it. It doesn't matter anymore.

Okay, now that I've said that... I have another opinion. I don't care that it's night, because I tend to forget things when I don't post them right away and I might be silenced tomorrow.

No guarantees here, but this seems like a pretty good case of Okaros setting up tomorrow's lynch.

Okaros, on 12 January 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

A sign of Atra's innocence? He's fingered 2 people who have no votes on them. I'm quite tempted to bekieve Shelly's played us with that ridiculous reveal.

He also set up today's lynch, with Atra being innocent. Btw, I like the picture scenes, quite funny.

Am I off base here, or does that seem suspicious?

right right. I get a little carried away.


@Silanah - didn't you promise to step up your game earlier?

[Kessobahn]

umm, actually, it's quite relevant. because even if you are an inno RI with a tendency to gnaw on your toes every time an idea comes to you, i'm not so sure about Sorritt.

[Kessobahn]

though i'm willing to drop that particular aspect of the argument, as long as people stop trying to use that which shall no longer be named as a viable tool.

[Okaros]

Osseric, on 12 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:

SORRIT AND KESSO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

No anger here, but I'd really like you two to stop arguing about it. It doesn't matter anymore.

Okay, now that I've said that... I have another opinion. I don't care that it's night, because I tend to forget things when I don't post them right away and I might be silenced tomorrow.

No guarantees here, but this seems like a pretty good case of Okaros setting up tomorrow's lynch.

Okaros, on 12 January 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:

A sign of Atra's innocence? He's fingered 2 people who have no votes on them. I'm quite tempted to bekieve Shelly's played us with that ridiculous reveal.

He also set up today's lynch, with Atra being innocent. Btw, I like the picture scenes, quite funny.

Am I off base here, or does that seem suspicious?

It is suspicious. I'm purposefully trying to make myself look more suspicious as you guys keep saying how very townie I am and basically painting a big 'kill him' sign on my forehead.

[Osseric]

Kessobahn, on 12 January 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:

umm, actually, it's quite relevant. because even if you are an inno RI with a tendency to gnaw on your toes every time an idea comes to you, i'm not so sure about Sorritt.

I don't disagree, but it doesn't mean you have to argue back and forth about it. Use it in a case against him, but don't continue a battle of what comes down to opinion. It's like arguing abortion, no one is going to convince the other.