Mafia 80 - The Benses IV Flocking Dragons
#481
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:33 AM
It is Day 1. 45 minutes remaining
14 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn
8 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
6 Votes for Tiamatha ( Korlat, Okaros, Eloth, Atrahal, Sheltatha Lore, Kessobahn )
2 Votes for Osseric (Olar Ethil, Karatallid )
3 Votes for Okaros ( Osseric, Sorrit, Tiamatha )
Players not voted: Galayn Lord, Silanah, Tulas Shorn
Essentially, Kesso and Kara swapped votes.
time should be about right on there.
14 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn
8 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
6 Votes for Tiamatha ( Korlat, Okaros, Eloth, Atrahal, Sheltatha Lore, Kessobahn )
2 Votes for Osseric (Olar Ethil, Karatallid )
3 Votes for Okaros ( Osseric, Sorrit, Tiamatha )
Players not voted: Galayn Lord, Silanah, Tulas Shorn
Essentially, Kesso and Kara swapped votes.
time should be about right on there.
#482
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:33 AM
Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 09:59 PM, said:
What's the easiest way to not get caught up in day 1 retardation?
To not partake.
How does one not partake?
By not posting. But if one does not post, one gets in trouble with the anti-lowposter committee.
How does one avoid these consequences?
By becoming silenced, so one's poor or low content posting cannot be helped.
Who has the power to silence?
Scum.
To not partake.
How does one not partake?
By not posting. But if one does not post, one gets in trouble with the anti-lowposter committee.
How does one avoid these consequences?
By becoming silenced, so one's poor or low content posting cannot be helped.
Who has the power to silence?
Scum.
i'm reaching here but the dramatic nature of this posting style stands out to me. he's suggesting scum silenced themselves so they wouldn't have to be involved in day 1 bullshit, which honestly isn't a TERRIBLE idea, but I think he is going balls to the wall on laying out exactly the scum plan and making it sound both plausible but ridiculous at the same time. yay for wifom.
#483
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:35 AM
Galayn Lord, on 11 January 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
I didn't get the joke either, Osseric. Listing out players to then jokingly vote an obviously missing player when all you have to do is quote the Path-Shaper update seemed like too much work for a joke vote.
I listed out the players to see who had checked in and who hadn't, on account of the silence. It was then that I noticed that a player was missing from the list, Tiam. I thought that odd, and decided to jokingly vote him for not being on the list, as a way to question PSer. Was having some fun.
#484
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:36 AM
Galayn Lord, on 11 January 2012 - 05:32 AM, said:
Don't tell people you are making a case on to shut the fuck up.
You can ignore their contribution until you are done or respond real-time.
Edit: they to you
You can ignore their contribution until you are done or respond real-time.
Edit: they to you
hey don't tell people who they can tell to shut the fuck up. besides, remember, as the most obviously inebriated player in this game, i'm going to fly off the handle, ok? so relax dude.
#486
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:38 AM
Osseric, on 11 January 2012 - 05:35 AM, said:
Galayn Lord, on 11 January 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
I didn't get the joke either, Osseric. Listing out players to then jokingly vote an obviously missing player when all you have to do is quote the Path-Shaper update seemed like too much work for a joke vote.
I listed out the players to see who had checked in and who hadn't, on account of the silence. It was then that I noticed that a player was missing from the list, Tiam. I thought that odd, and decided to jokingly vote him for not being on the list, as a way to question PSer. Was having some fun.
uh huh...and you switched to okaros before that was ever explained or resolved...in fact did p-s ever address this? If so i missed it
#487
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:39 AM
#488
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:40 AM
I'm going to show you fuck-faces how to be properly drunk and not an asshat here soon.
Oh that was a bad start.
Oh that was a bad start.
#489
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:44 AM
Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 10:10 PM, said:
Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:00 PM, said:
But, Uncle Ben silences and they don't have a lover comm. So it doesn't necessarily follow.
Doesn't matter. A good symp would know that his master doesn't want to risk being drawn into day 1 shenanigans, so they could take the easy route and silence him. Or they could have silenced themself, for the same reason. So when they come out of left field on day 2 with cases and deflection, they have a good reason.
more good wifom that can't be used for evidence even though it may be the real truth.
{i'll try to copy paste some of this...for the "bored"...)
Okaros, on 09 January 2012 - 10:13 PM, said:
this phrase strikes me really wrong. it's like he overplayed it a little and assumed too far that being silenced was likely to make that person scum.
Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:
Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:
And you're jumpy... as in jumping to the defence of a potential killer.
Sorrit, on 09 January 2012 - 10:00 PM, said:
Isn't it a bit redundant to use a picture to show that you're silenced?
He was being a good boy and clarifying for our obviously tiny minds.
Oh, and -Theblindsapper-, if you're going to watch the thread out of alt, log in anonymously. I see you down there.
no, YOU'RE jumpy for jumping at being called out on being jumpy. and you make it seem like even asking for a decent case on okaros is scummy, when in fact what's really scummy is trying to prevent people from discussing the silenced player.
edit - added word "like" for comprehension and actual sentence completion.
This post has been edited by Olar Ethil: 11 January 2012 - 05:45 AM
#490
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:44 AM
#491
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:47 AM
So far OE's case has been a collection of my joking remarks.
It's also a bit funny that you rail against me for using WIFOM (which, again, I wasn't trying to argue) then you say that I was trying to prevent people from discussing the silenced player... which is WIFOM. Anyway, keep going.
It's also a bit funny that you rail against me for using WIFOM (which, again, I wasn't trying to argue) then you say that I was trying to prevent people from discussing the silenced player... which is WIFOM. Anyway, keep going.
#492
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:50 AM
It is Day 1. 28 minutes remaining
14 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn
8 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
2 Votes for Osseric ( Olar Ethil, Karatallid )
6 Votes for Tiamatha ( Korlat, Okaros, Eloth, Atrahal, Sheltatha Lore, Kessobahn )
3 Votes for Okaros ( Osseric, Sorrit, Tiamatha )
Players not voted: Galayn Lord, Silanah, Tulas Shorn
14 Players still alive: Atrahal, Eloth, Galayn Lord, Karatallid, Kessobahn, Korlat, Okaros, Olar Ethil, Osseric, Sheltatha Lore, Silanah, Sorrit, Tiamatha, Tulas Shorn
8 votes to lynch, 7 votes to go to night.
2 Votes for Osseric ( Olar Ethil, Karatallid )
6 Votes for Tiamatha ( Korlat, Okaros, Eloth, Atrahal, Sheltatha Lore, Kessobahn )
3 Votes for Okaros ( Osseric, Sorrit, Tiamatha )
Players not voted: Galayn Lord, Silanah, Tulas Shorn
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#493
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:50 AM
An attempt to run out the clock? No real use though, other than an extra-day for whoever they are trying to protect.... Which wouldn't be terrible considering the jump. But, would obviously destroy UB or BB with the attempt.
#494
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:52 AM
I don't really see the vote going anywhere but Tiam at this point. Do you, GL?
I'd like to hear (read) the rest of this case before we head to night, though.
I'd like to hear (read) the rest of this case before we head to night, though.
#495
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:54 AM
Osseric, on 11 January 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
So far OE's case has been a collection of my joking remarks.
It's also a bit funny that you rail against me for using WIFOM (which, again, I wasn't trying to argue) then you say that I was trying to prevent people from discussing the silenced player... which is WIFOM. Anyway, keep going.
It's also a bit funny that you rail against me for using WIFOM (which, again, I wasn't trying to argue) then you say that I was trying to prevent people from discussing the silenced player... which is WIFOM. Anyway, keep going.
um no, I haven't been doing that, i've been saying you're scummy for doing it. and when you say things that fall under the "wifom" category, they sound quite serious - "And you're jumpy... as in jumping to the defence of a potential killer. " uhh duh we're all potential killers man, the whole point is that assuming the silenced player is ANY MORE LIKELY TO BE SCUM is what is the wifom is.
#496
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:56 AM
I'll switch if i have to just because I don't want to fuck town like that. we'll get something from the lynch train and I don't want to ruin that just because of my day 1 case (and that's all it is). so p-s keep updating me if you can...don't let me my drunk ass miss the deadline.
#497
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:58 AM
Yeah, I was serious about my WIFOM theory of the scum silencing the killer day 1. That's not up for debate. BECAUSE YOU CANT DEBATE WIFOM. This is the last time I'm explaining this. Literally the last time. My point was that if there was ever a time to test a WIFOM theory, it would be today. You could say that you don't think a WIFOM theory is worth testing, or you could say there are other better lynches available, but at the time I disagreed. I still do, really, every alternative is pretty terrible. Does everyone understand? I dont think I can clarify this any better..
#500
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:59 AM
Osseric, on 11 January 2012 - 05:58 AM, said:
Yeah, I was serious about my WIFOM theory of the scum silencing the killer day 1. That's not up for debate. BECAUSE YOU CANT DEBATE WIFOM. This is the last time I'm explaining this. Literally the last time. My point was that if there was ever a time to test a WIFOM theory, it would be today. You could say that you don't think a WIFOM theory is worth testing, or you could say there are other better lynches available, but at the time I disagreed. I still do, really, every alternative is pretty terrible. Does everyone understand? I dont think I can clarify this any better..
sigh
you already know my response to this, so I won't bother repeating myself for the nth time.