[Galayn Lord]

It's MAFIA, laddy, welcome to the land of people wanting evidence to lynch someone.

[Osseric]

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 09:58 PM, said:

Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 09:56 PM, said:

Remove Vote

Vote Okaros

For being the killer.

Good lord you are jumpy. Would you like to give a reason why Okaros is the killer?

And you're jumpy... as in jumping to the defence of a potential killer.

Sorrit, on 09 January 2012 - 10:00 PM, said:

Isn't it a bit redundant to use a picture to show that you're silenced?

He was being a good boy and clarifying for our obviously tiny minds.

Oh, and -Theblindsapper-, if you're going to watch the thread out of alt, log in anonymously. I see you down there.

[Galayn Lord]

I'm not jumping to anything. You didn't list your "reasons" for voting him.

You, on the other hand, have already voted for Tiam and Okaros within a 30 minute span.

[Osseric]

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:

It's MAFIA, laddy, welcome to the land of people wanting evidence to lynch someone.

Evidence you want? Best I dig up some bullshit signaling, then?

It IS day 1, after all. And those have OBVIOUSLY turned out so well in the past.

How about we go after something that makes sense, and not a shitty signaling case.

*Insert much sarcasm into the words in caps.

[Tiamatha]

Wait what? I'm not on the list? Am I like reverse-silenced? Uncle Ben can silence players and Auntie Benda has the power to make non-existent players speak?

[Galayn Lord]

Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:

It's MAFIA, laddy, welcome to the land of people wanting evidence to lynch someone.

Evidence you want? Best I dig up some bullshit signaling, then?

It IS day 1, after all. And those have OBVIOUSLY turned out so well in the past.

How about we go after something that makes sense, and not a shitty signaling case.

*Insert much sarcasm into the words in caps.

Day one signalling cases have worked out very well before, although not on day 1.

But, keep fighting the good fight.

[Osseric]

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:20 PM, said:

I'm not jumping to anything. You didn't list your "reasons" for voting him.

You, on the other hand, have already voted for Tiam and Okaros within a 30 minute span.

The Tiam vote was a joke vote used to point out that he wasn't on the list, and to imply that I thought that mysterious.

[Galayn Lord]

I will echo your call for Theblindsapper to get anonymous post-haste, though.

It's in the rules to view anonymously if you are playing in the game, not merely a preference.

[Osseric]

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:23 PM, said:

Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:18 PM, said:

It's MAFIA, laddy, welcome to the land of people wanting evidence to lynch someone.

Evidence you want? Best I dig up some bullshit signaling, then?

It IS day 1, after all. And those have OBVIOUSLY turned out so well in the past.

How about we go after something that makes sense, and not a shitty signaling case.

*Insert much sarcasm into the words in caps.

Day one signalling cases have worked out very well before, although not on day 1.

But, keep fighting the good fight.

Guess what day it is?

It's day 1. So you're implying that we should continue to lynch loose signaling cases intead of trying something different?

Boom,

Case rested.

[Osseric]

It's not as if you'll be modkilled for slipping up and viewing the thread naked, but the anonymity is required in order to prevent meta as much as possible.

[Galayn Lord]

So, stop making cases that have led to good results before?

Boom?

Case rested?

You see, for those games to have turned out well, the signalling case had to be made in the first place.... here B does follow A logically.

[Sorrit]

my apologies but I'm off to bed. The game started at an impractical time for me.

[Osseric]

Sorrit, on 09 January 2012 - 10:28 PM, said:

my apologies but I'm off to bed. The game started at an impractical time for me.

See ya

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:28 PM, said:

So, stop making cases that have led to good results before?

Boom?

Case rested?

You see, for those games to have turned out well, the signalling case had to be made in the first place.... here B does follow A logically.

So make your signaling cases. I'm not complaining about them being made. I'm complaining about you complaining about me making something other than a signaling case on day 1. There's literally no other kind of case to make. Make a signaling case, lynch because of it, no scum. Make a case using conjecture, get complained at. The cases with connections and shit can't be made yet. Hell, they can barely be made day 2 sometimes.

@Okaros

Are you watching this and laughing? Are you?

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=FsqJFIJ5lLs

[Atrahal]

Are you guys serious about this or just spamming up the thread a little?

Boom,

question asked

[Osseric]

Atrahal, on 09 January 2012 - 10:34 PM, said:

Are you guys serious about this or just spamming up the thread a little?

Boom,

question asked

TAKE ME SERIOUSLY OR I WILL RAGEEEE!

[Atrahal]

Alright, but don't say things like "Boom case rested" and not expect some snickering from the peanut gallery

[Okaros]

Osseric, on 09 January 2012 - 10:33 PM, said:

@Okaros

Are you watching this and laughing? Are you?

[Galayn Lord]

I'm not complaining about your case.

It has its own Vizzinian rationale.

I'm curious if you actually expect it to go anywhere, though.

[Osseric]

Atrahal, on 09 January 2012 - 10:40 PM, said:

Alright, but don't say things like "Boom case rested" and not expect some snickering from the peanut gallery

Oh, that.

That was a joke. There's rarely such a thing as "case rested" in this wonderful game. But the idea itself is not invalid because of my inability to stay serious for periods of time over 30 seconds.

Boom.

[Atrahal]

Galayn Lord, on 09 January 2012 - 10:43 PM, said:

I'm not complaining about your case.

It has its own Vizzinian rationale.

I'm curious if you actually expect it to go anywhere, though.

Hey, I actually get that