[Emurlahn]

Okaros, on 21 October 2011 - 06:09 PM, said:

Hey. Sorry for my absence, my router decided to fail on me this morning. I do not like how Emur and Kesso are setting themselves up as pretty much harmless. I don't trust that they are planning on taking a better chance at a loss by targeting one barb faction over another. There are hidden motives at play here.

Vote Kessobahn


I'd like to get the xia out of the picture. Too sly by far.

did you even read the last 3 pages?
Kesso can duel either warlord--how are we saying that's harmless?

and yes, I'm stating I have no offensive power--my role was pretty much that of figutrehead/support/rallying sytandard for my faction.

I can't duel and I can't kill. you may not want to believe that, that's fine. b

but don't try saying that we have smth to hide. that's so far beyond the pot and kettle phase it's not even funny.

[Emurlahn]

also, "better chance at a loss"?? wtf?

you really have no clue.

by eliminating one barb faction, we agree to settle this with a duel b/w Kesso and the remaining warlord. the winner's faction will lynch off the last person on the loser's side.

[Okaros]

Emurlahn, on 21 October 2011 - 09:01 PM, said:

also, "better chance at a loss"?? wtf?

you really have no clue.

by eliminating one barb faction, we agree to settle this with a duel b/w Kesso and the remaining warlord. the winner's faction will lynch off the last person on the loser's side.

Yeah that whole "better chance at a loss" thing, I'm not sure what I was trying to say. maybe better chance for a win? I dun know; I blame it on the lack of coffee. You claim to be harmless Emur, but if you are lying than your faction can easily screw the remaining warlord.

[Emurlahn]

Okaros, on 21 October 2011 - 09:06 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 21 October 2011 - 09:01 PM, said:

also, "better chance at a loss"?? wtf?

you really have no clue.

by eliminating one barb faction, we agree to settle this with a duel b/w Kesso and the remaining warlord. the winner's faction will lynch off the last person on the loser's side.

Yeah that whole "better chance at a loss" thing, I'm not sure what I was trying to say. maybe better chance for a win? I dun know; I blame it on the lack of coffee. You claim to be harmless Emur, but if you are lying than your faction can easily screw the remaining warlord.

dude, don't you think that If I had kills i'd have tried to use them by now?
more importantly, if I had additional powers, and they were in any way common to emperors, don't you think Tennes would have screamed bloody murder about them, once he found himself alone?

I have 2 passive abilities, and 2 acrive ones. it's up to you to believe me or not.

however, I'm a far more known quantity than you. we can't make any assumptions about your faction, b/c we already know it doesn't mirror the WR.

[Sheltatha Lore]

I will be around to play this weekend, so no prob w/o freeze

Vote Kessobahn

[Emurlahn]

Okaros, on 21 October 2011 - 09:06 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 21 October 2011 - 09:01 PM, said:

also, "better chance at a loss"?? wtf?

you really have no clue.

by eliminating one barb faction, we agree to settle this with a duel b/w Kesso and the remaining warlord. the winner's faction will lynch off the last person on the loser's side.

Yeah that whole "better chance at a loss" thing, I'm not sure what I was trying to say. maybe better chance for a win? I dun know; I blame it on the lack of coffee. You claim to be harmless Emur, but if you are lying than your faction can easily screw the remaining warlord.

except the remaing warlord will still have his bloody killer tomorrow.

god, you really haven't read the last few pages through, have you?

[Sheltatha Lore]

Emurlahn, on 21 October 2011 - 09:16 PM, said:

Okaros, on 21 October 2011 - 09:06 PM, said:

Emurlahn, on 21 October 2011 - 09:01 PM, said:

also, "better chance at a loss"?? wtf?

you really have no clue.

by eliminating one barb faction, we agree to settle this with a duel b/w Kesso and the remaining warlord. the winner's faction will lynch off the last person on the loser's side.

Yeah that whole "better chance at a loss" thing, I'm not sure what I was trying to say. maybe better chance for a win? I dun know; I blame it on the lack of coffee. You claim to be harmless Emur, but if you are lying than your faction can easily screw the remaining warlord.

dude, don't you think that If I had kills i'd have tried to use them by now?
more importantly, if I had additional powers, and they were in any way common to emperors, don't you think Tennes would have screamed bloody murder about them, once he found himself alone?

I have 2 passive abilities, and 2 acrive ones. it's up to you to believe me or not.

however, I'm a far more known quantity than you. we can't make any assumptions about your faction, b/c we already know it doesn't mirror the WR.

How can any of us know what powers you might have tried to use and failed so we wouldn't see the results?

[Emurlahn]

sigh, this is an argument neither side can't win.

I posted what my powers are. to belive me or not is up to the WR. no way I can prove it save posting my role PM (which would net me a modkill) and wouldn't be verifiable either.

[Karosis]

korlat?



where ya?


time to decide!

[Korlat]

I'm here.

[Karosis]

ok....so what does your gut say?

[Korlat]

Well I feel conflicted, my gut says not to trust Xia one inch, that with the other barbs there may be more risk in some ways and there are more unknowns but...well...

[Karosis]

pretty much what mine says

[Karosis]

i think we need to lynch kessoh because a duel between you and their champ is how this game should be decided....

[Karosis]

Vote kesso

[Emurlahn]

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:14 AM, said:

i think we need to lynch kessoh because a duel between you and their champ is how this game should be decided....

gl with that.
if their champ NKs korlat, don't say I didn't warn you...

[Karosis]

Emurlahn, on 22 October 2011 - 12:19 AM, said:

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:14 AM, said:

i think we need to lynch kessoh because a duel between you and their champ is how this game should be decided....

gl with that.
if their champ NKs korlat, don't say I didn't warn you...

then its just you and me baby....like its been all game

[Emurlahn]

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:24 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 22 October 2011 - 12:19 AM, said:

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:14 AM, said:

i think we need to lynch kessoh because a duel between you and their champ is how this game should be decided....

gl with that.
if their champ NKs korlat, don't say I didn't warn you...

then its just you and me baby....like its been all game

and their champ
and their warlord

[Karosis]

Emurlahn, on 22 October 2011 - 12:27 AM, said:

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:24 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on 22 October 2011 - 12:19 AM, said:

Karosis, on 22 October 2011 - 12:14 AM, said:

i think we need to lynch kessoh because a duel between you and their champ is how this game should be decided....

gl with that.
if their champ NKs korlat, don't say I didn't warn you...

then its just you and me baby....like its been all game

and their champ
and their warlord

hah...no i mean its just you and me against them

[Emurlahn]

besides, we were getting along so nicely all game. and then you had to go and ruin it.