Help
I have a meeting, I'll be back in a bit to mock Kesso some more.
Also, FYI, I'm going to vote for Anomandaris or HP.
BRB
Mafia 64.1 The Culling of the Memes M&P
#261
Silchas Ruin 
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 07-February 07
Posted 19 August 2010 - 03:31 PM
#262
Atrahal
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 03:51 PM
Another nice WIFOM argument explaining that you're not scum because if you were you would do something different...
As well as that, you mentioned Galain day one, early on, as in the top 4 scummiest people. It was pretty early, and I think you said something about it being based off not much. On the other hand, are you actually following the thread?
As well as that, you mentioned Galain day one, early on, as in the top 4 scummiest people. It was pretty early, and I think you said something about it being based off not much. On the other hand, are you actually following the thread?
#264
D'riss
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 19 August 2010 - 03:56 PM
Silchas I don't really understand you. You start sounding like Sorrit in some ways - more so the 'spikes' against some people, then stating you will vote for someone very different than the ones you discuss. Unless you're trying to get a rouse out of everyone, what is really the point of doing it?
It's the same thing Sorrit did today, accusing someone of 'voting for the symp rather than the master' when he himself did the exact same thing yesterday.
It's the same thing Sorrit did today, accusing someone of 'voting for the symp rather than the master' when he himself did the exact same thing yesterday.
#265
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:00 PM
Caught up.
I also don't think Galain is scum... but voted him anyway. At this point, I think we need to take the conversation in another direction. Let's get away from Sorrit shitting up the thread arguing the same thing over and over. It's making him look very sympish, even though I believe it's not the case. Sorrit tried a gambit, it didn't work and away we go. we've fixated and we need to get away from that. Either vote Galain or don't, but let's take a look around at others.
I do believe the Sorrit idea that HP, symped by Atrahal, is the best most convincing thing so far. He has played a smooth game and does fit the killer playstyle. I also still believe D'riss looks scummy as well still. But since he came on thread all blustery and indignant, people have turned in another direction. That's fine. We can get back to catching him later. I am going to go back and take a look at the early days and see if I can't find some interaction early in the game. but for now:
vote Hood's Path
I'm sure he'll come on all upset and say "What am I supposed to defend against" but w/e.
I also don't think Galain is scum... but voted him anyway. At this point, I think we need to take the conversation in another direction. Let's get away from Sorrit shitting up the thread arguing the same thing over and over. It's making him look very sympish, even though I believe it's not the case. Sorrit tried a gambit, it didn't work and away we go. we've fixated and we need to get away from that. Either vote Galain or don't, but let's take a look around at others.
I do believe the Sorrit idea that HP, symped by Atrahal, is the best most convincing thing so far. He has played a smooth game and does fit the killer playstyle. I also still believe D'riss looks scummy as well still. But since he came on thread all blustery and indignant, people have turned in another direction. That's fine. We can get back to catching him later. I am going to go back and take a look at the early days and see if I can't find some interaction early in the game. but for now:
vote Hood's Path
I'm sure he'll come on all upset and say "What am I supposed to defend against" but w/e.
#266
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:01 PM
I also, wouldn't be opposed to a SR vote. His end of the day antics were curious to say the least.
#267
Atrahal
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:16 PM
Out of interest, is there actually anything connecting me to HP. He's been under the radar, so I wouldn't mind lynching him, but I'm not really sure where the idea I'm symping him comes from. It seems to almost be two seperate cases. Sorrit seems to have decided that I am the symp for my pushing yesterday. He then seems to have decided on a killer, and made his case based on that.
Apparently my pushing was signalling. Actually I was pushing to put pressure on and get a reaction, and try and lynch who I thought most likely scum. Not really sure how it's signalling, beyond Sorrit saying I was over-enthusiastic.
I have a couple of problems with Sorrits case. He has decided I am a symp as step one. This is a bit OMGUS, but if he thinks my pushing is sympish, trying to distract attention, then that's fine. By putting pressure on who I thought was scum, and pushing for a reaction, it did move the spotlight. I would argue that only after the dodgy defenses did I actually put much pressure on. So this did draw attention. Activity always does. So, I disagree with some of his reasoning about me being a symp. Basically the accusation is that I was going for it from the start. I did play serious to start. However, I only really drew attention after I started putting on pressure, and that was mainly caused by the defence. Had he actually had a decent defence, would it have happened? No.
Anyhow, he's decided I am a symp, for this case. The next step is linking this to a master. And this part seems pretty arbitrary. The reasoning for HP has absolutely nothing to do with me. The symp-master connection just isn't there. The only connection he's drawn is that I've had attention, and he's been inconspicious. But that could apply to a fair number of people. Like he says, there isn't much of a case there. It kind of comes down to gut, as far as I can tell.
So as a whole, I don't think the case is great. He seems to think HP is scum, but doesn't do much to back it up. HP has been inconspicious. But the stuff about me being a symp just seems thrown in to try and give the case more substance. Like I said, it seems like two seperate ideas. He doesn't like how I played, and thinks I could be a symp. He doesn't like how HP played, and thinks he could be a master.
There's a bunch of inconspicious people.
Just now, i'm stuck between SR and Galain. Part of me is worried that SR could just be trying to draw attention as a symp. I also think lynching Galain would yield more information. However, SR has played more scummily.
Apparently my pushing was signalling. Actually I was pushing to put pressure on and get a reaction, and try and lynch who I thought most likely scum. Not really sure how it's signalling, beyond Sorrit saying I was over-enthusiastic.
I have a couple of problems with Sorrits case. He has decided I am a symp as step one. This is a bit OMGUS, but if he thinks my pushing is sympish, trying to distract attention, then that's fine. By putting pressure on who I thought was scum, and pushing for a reaction, it did move the spotlight. I would argue that only after the dodgy defenses did I actually put much pressure on. So this did draw attention. Activity always does. So, I disagree with some of his reasoning about me being a symp. Basically the accusation is that I was going for it from the start. I did play serious to start. However, I only really drew attention after I started putting on pressure, and that was mainly caused by the defence. Had he actually had a decent defence, would it have happened? No.
Anyhow, he's decided I am a symp, for this case. The next step is linking this to a master. And this part seems pretty arbitrary. The reasoning for HP has absolutely nothing to do with me. The symp-master connection just isn't there. The only connection he's drawn is that I've had attention, and he's been inconspicious. But that could apply to a fair number of people. Like he says, there isn't much of a case there. It kind of comes down to gut, as far as I can tell.
So as a whole, I don't think the case is great. He seems to think HP is scum, but doesn't do much to back it up. HP has been inconspicious. But the stuff about me being a symp just seems thrown in to try and give the case more substance. Like I said, it seems like two seperate ideas. He doesn't like how I played, and thinks I could be a symp. He doesn't like how HP played, and thinks he could be a master.
There's a bunch of inconspicious people.
Just now, i'm stuck between SR and Galain. Part of me is worried that SR could just be trying to draw attention as a symp. I also think lynching Galain would yield more information. However, SR has played more scummily.
#268
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:26 PM
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 02:19 AM, said:
Sew, I see not a lot has happened although there's been some attempt to hunt scum on this, day one. I'm honestly not sure where to go...I mean, we haven't spammed the thread like we usually do, this is a really quiet day one - which means we have low chances of flushing low-posting scum out. Then again, we seem to have generally resisted or ignored lynching low posters in the last few games, so I dunno.
The whole symping/train-starting stuff is cool and all, but really we're still taking a stab in the dark. It's just in a different direction than normal. I honestly don't think we're likely to get scum based on precedence, though, because the idea that scum do the same thing each game (when they're played by different people each time, too) is just silly.
Argh. How much time do we have left? Anyone know?
The whole symping/train-starting stuff is cool and all, but really we're still taking a stab in the dark. It's just in a different direction than normal. I honestly don't think we're likely to get scum based on precedence, though, because the idea that scum do the same thing each game (when they're played by different people each time, too) is just silly.
Argh. How much time do we have left? Anyone know?
Like this post... screams Wishy-washy
#269
Atrahal
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:31 PM
Yeah, I'm not denying that HP has been under-the-radar. Just that the case doesn't seem based off more than that. Though Sorrit kind of mentions this, I don't see why he bothers to add more than that, and then try and relate it, when it just seems like a seperate idea.
#270
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:45 PM
Then Filler...
Myabe Olar was symping Galain! OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG.
>.>
more filler
More filler...
Defensiveness....
But we would you want to? Is our three-way that boring that you are going to sleep through it?
Honestly, I find the above to be the most suspicious thing in the game so far. We talk about sexytime frequently around here but three-way is a pretty big word to throw out in a game where it's not clear from the setup who the bad guys are. If HP were, for example, a symp, it may be a good clue that he knows of 2 scum masters. The Galain response could be signalling, but it would indicate that if he's the master, he has foolishly given himself away for no reason.
So if HP is scummy, I would be very stunned if Galain were, as well.
Do you have a hard-on for me or something, Silchas? Seriously, what the fuck else do I call sleeping + voting + fucking?
filler
And one more wishy washy quote all in succession. (underlined is mine) Phrases like "Honestly" " On the other hand" "But at the same time" 'Alternatively" All scream of Ffence sitting.
Maybe I am clutching at straws here, he does go on to have a rather large post where he bitches out Sorrit and votes him, but thats when everyone else was bitching out sorrit as well, so not much of a leap there.
I am not sold on the idea that Atrahal is his symp... it very well could be Galain. With Galain's "Joke vote" towards HP 5-6 posts in, coupled with Galain's constant references to his Inno CF ( JA did this all the time as a symp)
I am happy with my vote on HP
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 02:25 AM, said:
Galain, on 17 August 2010 - 10:23 AM, said:
I can has post? Don't worry lolcat, I will keep you alive! Also,
vote HP
For voting.
vote HP
For voting.
Myabe Olar was symping Galain! OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG.
>.>
more filler
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 03:30 AM, said:
Don't worry about the missing people until they turn up an hour from modkill, make a post and disappear. Remember - strictly enforced modkill this game. 
More filler...
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 03:48 AM, said:
Nope. We're all 'sperienced to some level or another. Unless Bent counts for not having played in ages. 
Defensiveness....
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 03:50 AM, said:
Silchas Ruin, on 18 August 2010 - 03:47 AM, said:
Galain, on 17 August 2010 - 11:37 AM, said:
Hood, on 17 August 2010 - 10:50 AM, said:
Awww yeah.
Well, you guys keep up the good work. I can apparently fuck and vote, so I'm assuming I can three-way and sleep at the same time. See you all in the morning, bright and early...
Well, you guys keep up the good work. I can apparently fuck and vote, so I'm assuming I can three-way and sleep at the same time. See you all in the morning, bright and early...
But we would you want to? Is our three-way that boring that you are going to sleep through it?
Honestly, I find the above to be the most suspicious thing in the game so far. We talk about sexytime frequently around here but three-way is a pretty big word to throw out in a game where it's not clear from the setup who the bad guys are. If HP were, for example, a symp, it may be a good clue that he knows of 2 scum masters. The Galain response could be signalling, but it would indicate that if he's the master, he has foolishly given himself away for no reason.
So if HP is scummy, I would be very stunned if Galain were, as well.
Do you have a hard-on for me or something, Silchas? Seriously, what the fuck else do I call sleeping + voting + fucking?
filler
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 03:57 AM, said:
You're allowed opinions, of course. I'm curious as to where the hell they come from, sometimes, but even so, you seem to have focused a lot of talk around me today, that's all. No need to get uppity, PEON.
And one more wishy washy quote all in succession. (underlined is mine) Phrases like "Honestly" " On the other hand" "But at the same time" 'Alternatively" All scream of Ffence sitting.
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 08:29 AM, said:
Hrm, action, votes, discussion! Oh the glory of it all.
I honestly think that the case against D'riss is quite worthy, and it's got a bit of momentum now with the time left. But at the same time...laying a trap, Sorrit? That's an interesting play on day one - though I appreciate your position of trying to cover your actions and then people calling you on it later - and something that's highly likely to be either a scum tactic when they get called on something, or a rather pointless inno play, isn't it? I mean, what are you going to bring out: people who jump on a day one train. Wooo, like that's not going to get some bites. Alternatively, you're going to get jumped on for ass-covering and follow-up votes (basically what you were hoping to catch other people on) and then claim you were laying a trap to get out of your train-pushing. Bad play, Sorrit.
I honestly think that the case against D'riss is quite worthy, and it's got a bit of momentum now with the time left. But at the same time...laying a trap, Sorrit? That's an interesting play on day one - though I appreciate your position of trying to cover your actions and then people calling you on it later - and something that's highly likely to be either a scum tactic when they get called on something, or a rather pointless inno play, isn't it? I mean, what are you going to bring out: people who jump on a day one train. Wooo, like that's not going to get some bites. Alternatively, you're going to get jumped on for ass-covering and follow-up votes (basically what you were hoping to catch other people on) and then claim you were laying a trap to get out of your train-pushing. Bad play, Sorrit.
Maybe I am clutching at straws here, he does go on to have a rather large post where he bitches out Sorrit and votes him, but thats when everyone else was bitching out sorrit as well, so not much of a leap there.
I am not sold on the idea that Atrahal is his symp... it very well could be Galain. With Galain's "Joke vote" towards HP 5-6 posts in, coupled with Galain's constant references to his Inno CF ( JA did this all the time as a symp)
I am happy with my vote on HP
#271
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:47 PM
It would be funny if Sorrit's little experiment on Galain actually tagged the symp and the Killers on thread were fighting/voting to take him out.
#272
Silchas Ruin
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 07-February 07
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:47 PM
This long, garbage defense post is ridiculous. Why on earth is Atrahal giving us a novella about why he can't be linked to HP?
Atrahal, on 19 August 2010 - 04:16 PM, said:
Out of interest, is there actually anything connecting me to HP. He's been under the radar, so I wouldn't mind lynching him, but I'm not really sure where the idea I'm symping him comes from. It seems to almost be two seperate cases. Sorrit seems to have decided that I am the symp for my pushing yesterday. He then seems to have decided on a killer, and made his case based on that.
Apparently my pushing was signalling. Actually I was pushing to put pressure on and get a reaction, and try and lynch who I thought most likely scum. Not really sure how it's signalling, beyond Sorrit saying I was over-enthusiastic.
I have a couple of problems with Sorrits case. He has decided I am a symp as step one. This is a bit OMGUS, but if he thinks my pushing is sympish, trying to distract attention, then that's fine. By putting pressure on who I thought was scum, and pushing for a reaction, it did move the spotlight. I would argue that only after the dodgy defenses did I actually put much pressure on. So this did draw attention. Activity always does. So, I disagree with some of his reasoning about me being a symp. Basically the accusation is that I was going for it from the start. I did play serious to start. However, I only really drew attention after I started putting on pressure, and that was mainly caused by the defence. Had he actually had a decent defence, would it have happened? No.
Anyhow, he's decided I am a symp, for this case. The next step is linking this to a master. And this part seems pretty arbitrary. The reasoning for HP has absolutely nothing to do with me. The symp-master connection just isn't there. The only connection he's drawn is that I've had attention, and he's been inconspicious. But that could apply to a fair number of people. Like he says, there isn't much of a case there. It kind of comes down to gut, as far as I can tell.
So as a whole, I don't think the case is great. He seems to think HP is scum, but doesn't do much to back it up. HP has been inconspicious. But the stuff about me being a symp just seems thrown in to try and give the case more substance. Like I said, it seems like two seperate ideas. He doesn't like how I played, and thinks I could be a symp. He doesn't like how HP played, and thinks he could be a master.
There's a bunch of inconspicious people.
Just now, i'm stuck between SR and Galain. Part of me is worried that SR could just be trying to draw attention as a symp. I also think lynching Galain would yield more information. However, SR has played more scummily.
Apparently my pushing was signalling. Actually I was pushing to put pressure on and get a reaction, and try and lynch who I thought most likely scum. Not really sure how it's signalling, beyond Sorrit saying I was over-enthusiastic.
I have a couple of problems with Sorrits case. He has decided I am a symp as step one. This is a bit OMGUS, but if he thinks my pushing is sympish, trying to distract attention, then that's fine. By putting pressure on who I thought was scum, and pushing for a reaction, it did move the spotlight. I would argue that only after the dodgy defenses did I actually put much pressure on. So this did draw attention. Activity always does. So, I disagree with some of his reasoning about me being a symp. Basically the accusation is that I was going for it from the start. I did play serious to start. However, I only really drew attention after I started putting on pressure, and that was mainly caused by the defence. Had he actually had a decent defence, would it have happened? No.
Anyhow, he's decided I am a symp, for this case. The next step is linking this to a master. And this part seems pretty arbitrary. The reasoning for HP has absolutely nothing to do with me. The symp-master connection just isn't there. The only connection he's drawn is that I've had attention, and he's been inconspicious. But that could apply to a fair number of people. Like he says, there isn't much of a case there. It kind of comes down to gut, as far as I can tell.
So as a whole, I don't think the case is great. He seems to think HP is scum, but doesn't do much to back it up. HP has been inconspicious. But the stuff about me being a symp just seems thrown in to try and give the case more substance. Like I said, it seems like two seperate ideas. He doesn't like how I played, and thinks I could be a symp. He doesn't like how HP played, and thinks he could be a master.
There's a bunch of inconspicious people.
Just now, i'm stuck between SR and Galain. Part of me is worried that SR could just be trying to draw attention as a symp. I also think lynching Galain would yield more information. However, SR has played more scummily.
#273
D'riss
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 05-October 08
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:49 PM
Hood's Path is one of the people I haven't been able to get a good read on, as well. Same boat with Kessoh, Ano, and Olar as well.
There's still time, and I hope all these people drop in the thread soon (Olar at least seems to be around). The biggest issue I have right now, is that I can't bring myself up to decide, wether I want to pursue different targets (unless they seriously start contributing on the thread and we have more to work with) than the ones that are already on the table.
While I understand people want to take a complete turn of events, just to get away from the whole Galain-Sorrit-SR fiasko so far - Hood's Path sounds the best option apart from the rest of the people that fit the same 'profile' as him? Understand that while Sorrit could be hinting his reasons for why he thinks HP should stand out, the whole vibe I got from his post, is that he's actually trying to 'connect' him with Atrahal. It should be more than just 'trying to get back to your face' moto.It seems biased to me, thats all.
It pisses me off that we might end up paying heavily for yesterdays 'no lynch' mistake.
Gonna be around for the next 8-9 hours before heading to bed, if people want to talk about things more. Will vote before going to sleep.
There's still time, and I hope all these people drop in the thread soon (Olar at least seems to be around). The biggest issue I have right now, is that I can't bring myself up to decide, wether I want to pursue different targets (unless they seriously start contributing on the thread and we have more to work with) than the ones that are already on the table.
While I understand people want to take a complete turn of events, just to get away from the whole Galain-Sorrit-SR fiasko so far - Hood's Path sounds the best option apart from the rest of the people that fit the same 'profile' as him? Understand that while Sorrit could be hinting his reasons for why he thinks HP should stand out, the whole vibe I got from his post, is that he's actually trying to 'connect' him with Atrahal. It should be more than just 'trying to get back to your face' moto.It seems biased to me, thats all.
It pisses me off that we might end up paying heavily for yesterdays 'no lynch' mistake.
Gonna be around for the next 8-9 hours before heading to bed, if people want to talk about things more. Will vote before going to sleep.
#274
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:50 PM
Atrahal, on 19 August 2010 - 04:31 PM, said:
Yeah, I'm not denying that HP has been under-the-radar. Just that the case doesn't seem based off more than that. Though Sorrit kind of mentions this, I don't see why he bothers to add more than that, and then try and relate it, when it just seems like a seperate idea.
Yeah, the more I looked at it, I am not sold on your involvement, thinking it through Galain looks more sympish imo.
#275
Emurlahnis
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 0
- Joined: 17-June 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:51 PM
Sorry guys I don't really have time to make a case.
But amid all of the hub bub about HP I feel that we have forgotten about Anomandaris. He has been sliding through the game with barely a ripple.
Vote Anomandaris
But amid all of the hub bub about HP I feel that we have forgotten about Anomandaris. He has been sliding through the game with barely a ripple.
Vote Anomandaris
#276
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:54 PM
D, on 19 August 2010 - 04:49 PM, said:
Hood's Path is one of the people I haven't been able to get a good read on, as well. Same boat with Kessoh, Ano, and Olar as well.
There's still time, and I hope all these people drop in the thread soon (Olar at least seems to be around). The biggest issue I have right now, is that I can't bring myself up to decide, wether I want to pursue different targets (unless they seriously start contributing on the thread and we have more to work with) than the ones that are already on the table.
While I understand people want to take a complete turn of events, just to get away from the whole Galain-Sorrit-SR fiasko so far - Hood's Path sounds the best option apart from the rest of the people that fit the same 'profile' as him? Understand that while Sorrit could be hinting his reasons for why he thinks HP should stand out, the whole vibe I got from his post, is that he's actually trying to 'connect' him with Atrahal. It should be more than just 'trying to get back to your face' moto.It seems biased to me, thats all.
It pisses me off that we might end up paying heavily for yesterdays 'no lynch' mistake.
Gonna be around for the next 8-9 hours before heading to bed, if people want to talk about things more. Will vote before going to sleep.
There's still time, and I hope all these people drop in the thread soon (Olar at least seems to be around). The biggest issue I have right now, is that I can't bring myself up to decide, wether I want to pursue different targets (unless they seriously start contributing on the thread and we have more to work with) than the ones that are already on the table.
While I understand people want to take a complete turn of events, just to get away from the whole Galain-Sorrit-SR fiasko so far - Hood's Path sounds the best option apart from the rest of the people that fit the same 'profile' as him? Understand that while Sorrit could be hinting his reasons for why he thinks HP should stand out, the whole vibe I got from his post, is that he's actually trying to 'connect' him with Atrahal. It should be more than just 'trying to get back to your face' moto.It seems biased to me, thats all.
It pisses me off that we might end up paying heavily for yesterdays 'no lynch' mistake.
Gonna be around for the next 8-9 hours before heading to bed, if people want to talk about things more. Will vote before going to sleep.
Yeah.... how SR thinks that a no-vote is actually helping us right now is beyond me.... Like I said, I would be fine with a vote for him just based on his deadline play yesterday but I am sticking with HP for now.
Pro-tip Kids: in a M&P a wrong lynch is better than no lynch on day 1!!!
#277
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:55 PM
Emurlahnis, on 19 August 2010 - 04:51 PM, said:
Sorry guys I don't really have time to make a case.
But amid all of the hub bub about HP I feel that we have forgotten about Anomandaris. He has been sliding through the game with barely a ripple.
Vote Anomandaris
But amid all of the hub bub about HP I feel that we have forgotten about Anomandaris. He has been sliding through the game with barely a ripple.
Vote Anomandaris
he's in the same Vein as HP imo. (and me to some extent)
#278
Olar Ethil
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 14-April 09
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:55 PM
ok, off to a meeting. Back in an hr.
#280
Silchas Ruin
- Recruit
-
- Group: Game alts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 07-February 07
Posted 19 August 2010 - 04:58 PM
OK, stuff we know (also there's a typo in Ano being left in the vote for Olar and Olar's vote being left on Galain)
Stuff I'm guessing
- There's a guard or a healer in the game. Healer is more likely. A Healer would have been very smart to heal someone like Emur or me last night since we were good kill targets (I'm no longer a good kill target because i'm lynchable).
- 5 people thought the Galain case was garbage: Olar, Sorrit, Emur, Galain (duh), and Silchas (me). You can crucify me all you want for it, but the case was bad. You can also argue that it's better to get a lynch than no lynch, and I argue that a terrible lynch is an absolute waste. So cry more.
- It's VERY easy as a member of the scum to no lynch and sew confusion (which apparently is the crux of the argument today), but it's also easy to 'vote for a lynch' at the end of the day.
- Three people fit the profile for #3 -- Hood's Path, Anomandaris and Olar Ethil. Olar was pretty suspicious yesterday, but I find his vote the least suspicious of the three. HP's vote is BY FAR the most suspicious. The "Fuck It, I have to vote for someone so I guess I vote for the guy already with a lot of votes" is such a bad excuse. Ano kind of goofed around yesterday with his memespeak and then got srs when crunch time showed up.
Stuff I'm guessing
- It's almost guaranteed that all scum aren't on the same train IF THERE ARE THREE SCUM. So one of Galain, Sorrit, or myself is, in all likelihood, scum. It's not me and I'm pretty confident it's not Galain. So Sorrit's the default. If there are two scum, this theory is highly unlikely.
- It IS guaranteed that at least one scum is on Galain's train. So you absolutely have to lynch one of Atrahal, D'riss, Kesso, HP, Ano, or Olar. Atrahal made the case, Kesso had the best vote. D'riss is still suspcious, but I think the HP and Ano votes need the most attention.
- Ergo, IMO, we vote for HP or Ano.
Path-Shaper, on 18 August 2010 - 11:47 PM, said:
Day 1, 0 hours and 0 minutes remain.
12 players are left alive. Anomandaris, Atrahal, D'riss, Emurlahnis, Galain, Hood's Path, Kessobahn,
Okaros, Olar Ethil, Silchas Ruin, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn
6 votes Galain: Atrahal, D'riss, Kessobahn, Hood's Path, Anomandaris, Olar Ethil
2 votes Olar Ethil: Emurlahnis, Anomandaris
4 votes D'riss: Olar Ethil, Galain, Sorrit, Silchas Ruin
Players not voted: Okaros, Tulas Shorn
Day 1 has finished. No one was lynched.
Night 1
No one died.
Modkills
A poor innocent meme has disappeared from the internet forever. Tulas Shorn (Bent), has been modkilled for inactivity.
A poor innocent meme has disappeared from the internet forever. Okaros (MTS), has been modkilled for inactivity.
12 players are left alive. Anomandaris, Atrahal, D'riss, Emurlahnis, Galain, Hood's Path, Kessobahn,
Okaros, Olar Ethil, Silchas Ruin, Sorrit, Tulas Shorn
6 votes Galain: Atrahal, D'riss, Kessobahn, Hood's Path, Anomandaris, Olar Ethil
2 votes Olar Ethil: Emurlahnis, Anomandaris
4 votes D'riss: Olar Ethil, Galain, Sorrit, Silchas Ruin
Players not voted: Okaros, Tulas Shorn
Day 1 has finished. No one was lynched.
Night 1
No one died.
Modkills
A poor innocent meme has disappeared from the internet forever. Tulas Shorn (Bent), has been modkilled for inactivity.
A poor innocent meme has disappeared from the internet forever. Okaros (MTS), has been modkilled for inactivity.
Hood, on 18 August 2010 - 11:42 AM, said:
Fuck it. Sorry Galain, but I'm going to bed, have to vote one way or another, and my suspicions of Sorrit naturally lead you to be the sensible choice.
Remove Vote
Vote Galain
Won't be back on before lynch...hope we get one, though.
Remove Vote
Vote Galain
Won't be back on before lynch...hope we get one, though.
Anomandaris, on 18 August 2010 - 04:39 PM, said:
OE - there is nothing to discuss, I was just pointing it out. Obviously no one agrees, as usual, and I will get to be all "Told ya so" later.
Saying Galain didn't play like a scum today means shit all, it's pretty damn easy to look inno on day 1 for any scum, let alone an M&P one. That the best case of the day accuses him and yet there's still 5 people on other cases is ample enough reasoning for me to vote him. You supporting him is just icing on the cake to me.
Remove Vote
Vote Galain
Saying Galain didn't play like a scum today means shit all, it's pretty damn easy to look inno on day 1 for any scum, let alone an M&P one. That the best case of the day accuses him and yet there's still 5 people on other cases is ample enough reasoning for me to vote him. You supporting him is just icing on the cake to me.
Remove Vote
Vote Galain
Olar Ethil, on 18 August 2010 - 05:00 PM, said:
I said "real" pressure as in the 2 page quote-a-thon.
remove vote
vote Galain
If we don't do it today, we are only going to have to keep talking about it tomorrow. Saorry man. I think you got the raw end of the stick. At the very least we can get some good info out of today based on whats happened up to this point.
remove vote
vote Galain
If we don't do it today, we are only going to have to keep talking about it tomorrow. Saorry man. I think you got the raw end of the stick. At the very least we can get some good info out of today based on whats happened up to this point.
