[Silanah]

Fener, on 20 May 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

D said:

I think it is safe to say his [Korv's]attempt at content is quite minimal.

precisely.
at this point, I dunno who's on my team, but even if Korv is it, he's a liability.
as such, he's the safest vote I could think of, lol.

Which is what I've just been thinking. I don't see us getting a 10-vote-worthy case at this point, which means another day without a lynch, which isn't really ideal. That said, I'm always hesitant to vote off low-posters. It's always a low-probability outcome, scumwise.

[Galayn Lord]

Hmm I think we should stop voting for new people.ahh it will end up like last time where there are tons of votes on random people

[Kaschan]

5.5 hours left and a massive vote spread again.

I dont think its wise to not lynch today. Saying that - I would put my vote on Emu or Meanas of the ones who have votes (if I can and if I needed to change to get the votes). I think Mockra is playing pretty straight and not overly conservative, so I can give him a pass for now.

[Mockra]

Kaschan, on 20 May 2010 - 01:46 PM, said:

Also - for a brief second I got a driver error message wen trying to post that last post.

Same here.... wonder if that had anything to do with the format fail.

For the game, I think I'd be fine voting Korvalain. Meanas at least does have a little bit of useful commentary.

Whoever mentioned Shelatha kind of spamming the thread, I think we're all spamming, some more than others. But Shelatha did at least give me a once-over, so I know he's playing the game.

[Kaschan]

Mockra, on 20 May 2010 - 01:51 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 20 May 2010 - 01:46 PM, said:

Also - for a brief second I got a driver error message wen trying to post that last post.

Same here.... wonder if that had anything to do with the format fail.

For the game, I think I'd be fine voting Korvalain. Meanas at least does have a little bit of useful commentary.

Whoever mentioned Shelatha kind of spamming the thread, I think we're all spamming, some more than others. But Shelatha did at least give me a once-over, so I know he's playing the game.

I mentioned SL. And I forgot the Korv vote. I would vote Korv as well.

As to SL - its not that theres spam per se, its just the way in which its being presented (that sounds dumb, I know). But its as if hes trying too hard to keep it going. I dunno, hell, call it gut.

[Mockra]

Silanah, on 20 May 2010 - 01:50 PM, said:

Fener, on 20 May 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

D said:

I think it is safe to say his [Korv's]attempt at content is quite minimal.

precisely.
at this point, I dunno who's on my team, but even if Korv is it, he's a liability.
as such, he's the safest vote I could think of, lol.

Which is what I've just been thinking. I don't see us getting a 10-vote-worthy case at this point, which means another day without a lynch, which isn't really ideal. That said, I'm always hesitant to vote off low-posters. It's always a low-probability outcome, scumwise.

We should definitely lynch.

It would at least be interesting if people are willing to vote off SOMEONE, even if it's a low poster. Low posters probably are less likely to be scum, but we have to narrow down the other teams, as well. The biggest reason to not vote for a low poster is that it's easy to vote for them, hard to find scum in the train. But at least we'll get SOME kind of information.

Finally, while there's a risk of voting a team mate, it's not like a guy with 3 or 4 posts is really helping you out.

[Mockra]

Kaschan, on 20 May 2010 - 01:54 PM, said:

Mockra, on 20 May 2010 - 01:51 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 20 May 2010 - 01:46 PM, said:

Also - for a brief second I got a driver error message wen trying to post that last post.

Same here.... wonder if that had anything to do with the format fail.

For the game, I think I'd be fine voting Korvalain. Meanas at least does have a little bit of useful commentary.

Whoever mentioned Shelatha kind of spamming the thread, I think we're all spamming, some more than others. But Shelatha did at least give me a once-over, so I know he's playing the game.

I mentioned SL. And I forgot the Korv vote. I would vote Korv as well.

As to SL - its not that theres spam per se, its just the way in which its being presented (that sounds dumb, I know). But its as if hes trying too hard to keep it going. I dunno, hell, call it gut.

Yeah, I understand that. Worth watching, but IMO not worth voting at this time.

5 hours is a long time but may as well get things going.

Vote Korvalain

Back in an hour.

[Kaschan]

Mockra, on 20 May 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Silanah, on 20 May 2010 - 01:50 PM, said:

Fener, on 20 May 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

D said:

I think it is safe to say his [Korv's]attempt at content is quite minimal.

precisely.
at this point, I dunno who's on my team, but even if Korv is it, he's a liability.
as such, he's the safest vote I could think of, lol.

Which is what I've just been thinking. I don't see us getting a 10-vote-worthy case at this point, which means another day without a lynch, which isn't really ideal. That said, I'm always hesitant to vote off low-posters. It's always a low-probability outcome, scumwise.

We should definitely lynch.

It would at least be interesting if people are willing to vote off SOMEONE, even if it's a low poster. Low posters probably are less likely to be scum, but we have to narrow down the other teams, as well. The biggest reason to not vote for a low poster is that it's easy to vote for them, hard to find scum in the train. But at least we'll get SOME kind of information.

Finally, while there's a risk of voting a team mate, it's not like a guy with 3 or 4 posts is really helping you out.

Heh, unless they are a healer, or guard or some other really useful role that your team needs! But I do agree, other than that.

[Silanah]

Mockra, on 20 May 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Silanah, on 20 May 2010 - 01:50 PM, said:

Fener, on 20 May 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

D said:

I think it is safe to say his [Korv's]attempt at content is quite minimal.

precisely.
at this point, I dunno who's on my team, but even if Korv is it, he's a liability.
as such, he's the safest vote I could think of, lol.

Which is what I've just been thinking. I don't see us getting a 10-vote-worthy case at this point, which means another day without a lynch, which isn't really ideal. That said, I'm always hesitant to vote off low-posters. It's always a low-probability outcome, scumwise.

We should definitely lynch.

It would at least be interesting if people are willing to vote off SOMEONE, even if it's a low poster. Low posters probably are less likely to be scum, but we have to narrow down the other teams, as well. The biggest reason to not vote for a low poster is that it's easy to vote for them, hard to find scum in the train. But at least we'll get SOME kind of information.

Finally, while there's a risk of voting a team mate, it's not like a guy with 3 or 4 posts is really helping you out.

Yeah, his own fault really.

I agree that we need to lynch, so I guess regardless of his alignment, it's a step in the right direction at least. So I'm fine with it.

[D'riss]

We need to hit one thousand post's before the lynch though to go to level two.

[Kaschan]

9 people on - 3 people posting.

Remove Vote
Vote Korvalain

if it counts.

[Silanah]

Kaschan, on 20 May 2010 - 01:59 PM, said:

Mockra, on 20 May 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Silanah, on 20 May 2010 - 01:50 PM, said:

Fener, on 20 May 2010 - 01:41 PM, said:

D said:

I think it is safe to say his [Korv's]attempt at content is quite minimal.

precisely.
at this point, I dunno who's on my team, but even if Korv is it, he's a liability.
as such, he's the safest vote I could think of, lol.

Which is what I've just been thinking. I don't see us getting a 10-vote-worthy case at this point, which means another day without a lynch, which isn't really ideal. That said, I'm always hesitant to vote off low-posters. It's always a low-probability outcome, scumwise.

We should definitely lynch.

It would at least be interesting if people are willing to vote off SOMEONE, even if it's a low poster. Low posters probably are less likely to be scum, but we have to narrow down the other teams, as well. The biggest reason to not vote for a low poster is that it's easy to vote for them, hard to find scum in the train. But at least we'll get SOME kind of information.

Finally, while there's a risk of voting a team mate, it's not like a guy with 3 or 4 posts is really helping you out.

Heh, unless they are a healer, or guard or some other really useful role that your team needs! But I do agree, other than that.

Considering how little he's been around, unless he's been lurking or under some sort of posting ban (a la the thing the poisoner role had in SC 1) he's not likely to be using it to much effect anyway.

[Silanah]

D, on 20 May 2010 - 02:00 PM, said:

We need to hit one thousand post's before the lynch though to go to level two.

Shall we enact the opening scene of Spamalot?

Vote Korvalain

[Omtose]

I'm fine with actually voting someone off today and Korvalain seams as good a lynch as there is at the moment.

I have no problem getting the ball rolling on this ether.

remove vote/vote Korvalain=non-joke vote

[D'riss]

vote korvalain

I am not sure if i will be on near the end of day so I will place my vote now, but people should be aware of our post count before hammering.

[Omtose]

cross posted!!!!

[Kaschan]

D, on 20 May 2010 - 02:00 PM, said:

We need to hit one thousand post's before the lynch though to go to level two.

I doubt that will be a problem. But we should probably use all 5 hours before we do, this will make 1500 easier to reach tomorrow.

[Silanah]

Omtose, on 20 May 2010 - 02:03 PM, said:

I'm fine with actually voting someone off today and Korvalain seams as good a lynch as there is at the moment.

I have no problem getting the ball rolling on this ether.

remove vote/vote Korvalain=non-joke vote

[Kaschan]

Remove Vote

Wow.

[Eloth]

I could go for a low poster.

If anything just to get a lynch, right now it looks like we may never lynch with eh way people are voting.