[Kaschan]

fucking NAKED as the day you were born...hahah dumbass

[Silanah]

Lisheo, on 06 April 2010 - 02:06 PM, said:

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 02:03 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

It got going with Atrahal's vote on Kaschan. Something is biting in that neighbourhood.I would go for either one, I think it gives good odds of a good lynch. Atrahal for the reasons I said earlier (plus the extra pressure that appeared on Kaschan after our votes) or Kaschan for trying to stick the words "my leader" in more than 3/4 of his posts. Yes, we get it, you can't be a leader because you have one, stop "playing the part".

ill word my posts how i fucking please thank you very much.Besides if i am talking about my leader how else must i say it?...."the person who leads a group" maybe? ...or what?pfffft

It's not the wording, it's just that you manage to mention your "leader" no many times in your discussions you remind me of that scene in "the 40 year-old virgin" with the guy talking how awesome it is to squeeze women's breasts and how awesome they are to the touch.

I hear they're like sandbags.

@Atrahal
Yes, we're all one team, clearly. And Kaschan is our leader. We're all THAT bad at playing Mafia.

clearly, since you forget to get in alt, you COULD be that bad,
anyhow, I'm latre for work, as usual.

back eventually, i'll try to use my phone.

[Atrahal]

@ Lish: Get Naked!!!

[Serc]

God damnit, that's what comes of using two browsers at once and being tired. XD

The argument above: Three team members cannot possibly know each other. So, yes, it's possible there's a link here, but I'm not basing my vote on "fishy feelings"

[Mockra]

I like how we spent 3 pages of posts coming to the agreement that faction members would need to be lobotomized retards to obviously follow their leaders in the votes, and now it's being thrown around like rice at a wedding.

[Mockra]

Who is this "Lisheo" and when was he cast in this movie?

[Kaschan]

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 02:03 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

It got going with Atrahal's vote on Kaschan. Something is biting in that neighbourhood.

I would go for either one, I think it gives good odds of a good lynch. Atrahal for the reasons I said earlier (plus the extra pressure that appeared on Kaschan after our votes) or Kaschan for trying to stick the words "my leader" in more than 3/4 of his posts.

Yes, we get it, you can't be a leader because you have one, stop "playing the part".

ill word my posts how i fucking please thank you very much.

Besides if i am talking about my leader how else must i say it?...."the person who leads a group" maybe? ...or what?


pfffft

It's not the wording, it's just that you manage to mention your "leader" no many times in your discussions you remind me of that scene in "the 40 year-old virgin" with the guy talking how awesome it is to squeeze women's breasts and how awesome they are to the touch.

we are duscusing my leader...so im bound to say it a few times.

besides....breasts are awesome to touch and they are even more awesomner to squeeze...wats your point?

[Serc]

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 02:15 PM, said:

I like how we spent 3 pages of posts coming to the agreement that faction members would need to be lobotomized retards to obviously follow their leaders in the votes, and now it's being thrown around like rice at a wedding.

NO U.
To be fair, we've all run out of arguments, it's the middle of Day One, we've got nothing to do but WIFOM everything.

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:09 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Underlined one: Kasch's vote was in between. As was Mockra's (post 185). So, not three in a row. Incidentally, Kasch, you and Mockra were the 3 I had linked on beforehand. Seems I hit a nerve.
Underlined 2: very altruistic of you. Generous, even. Except that it has been consistently your point to say you don't care much for him, say he's an idiot, how the other players can profit, et cetera.
Underlined 3: so Tellan, me and Sil is apparently an organisation - then what do you make of Kasch, Mockra and you, good sir? The whole shitfest started when I linked you 3 together, after all.

no the shitfest started when you 2 voted for me for reasons that are shit...hurr durr

[Serc]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:09 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Underlined one: Kasch's vote was in between. As was Mockra's (post 185). So, not three in a row. Incidentally, Kasch, you and Mockra were the 3 I had linked on beforehand. Seems I hit a nerve.
Underlined 2: very altruistic of you. Generous, even. Except that it has been consistently your point to say you don't care much for him, say he's an idiot, how the other players can profit, et cetera.
Underlined 3: so Tellan, me and Sil is apparently an organisation - then what do you make of Kasch, Mockra and you, good sir? The whole shitfest started when I linked you 3 together, after all.

When did you link me with Mockra, and Kaschan, actually? I seem to remember that the only reason we were linked was because we were all posting at the same time.

[Mockra]

I wouldn't mind a vote count actually, I have a feeling I'm starting to get some of youse confused.

[Mockra]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 02:18 PM, said:

no the shitfest started when you 2 voted for me for reasons that are shit...hurr durr

You realize that, in a merc game, that doesn't sound too good for you?

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:09 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Underlined one: Kasch's vote was in between. As was Mockra's (post 185). So, not three in a row. Incidentally, Kasch, you and Mockra were the 3 I had linked on beforehand. Seems I hit a nerve.
Underlined 2: very altruistic of you. Generous, even. Except that it has been consistently your point to say you don't care much for him, say he's an idiot, how the other players can profit, et cetera.
Underlined 3: so Tellan, me and Sil is apparently an organisation - then what do you make of Kasch, Mockra and you, good sir? The whole shitfest started when I linked you 3 together, after all.

no the shitfest started when you 2 voted for me for reasons that make no sense...hurr durr

[Atrahal]

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 02:14 PM, said:

God damnit, that's what comes of using two browsers at once and being tired. XD

The argument above: Three team members cannot possibly know each other. So, yes, it's possible there's a link here, but I'm not basing my vote on "fishy feelings"

And yet you seem happy to use it to tie Tellan, moi et Sil
I still feel you are defending Kasch. You also have made no reply whatsoever to the false statement of three votes in a row (of course, what could you do but admit you're wrong?). It's gonna stick to you... so if he means so little to you, why actively defend/ attack his attackers?
If we have exhausted our arguments, if we are in a pile of WIFOM, if we only are halfway through the day, then why the vote for something you desperately want to believe us to not concern you?

[Kaschan]

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 02:22 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 02:18 PM, said:

no the shitfest started when you 2 voted for me for reasons that are shit...hurr durr

You realize that, in a merc game, that doesn't sound too good for you?

you mean in the sense that people are likely to target me?

[Path-Shaper]

It's day 1.

roughly 15 hours and 10 min left in the day.

16 players remain alive: Sorrit, Atrahal, Alkend, Kalse, Silanah, Korlat, Ampelas, Rashan, Tennes, Tellan, Telas, Serc, Mockra, Liosan, kaschan, Galain

9 votes to lynch
8 vote to night

1 vote for Kalse (Ampelas)
1 Votes Rashan (Galain)
2 Vote for Kaschan (Tellan,Atrahal,Silanah)
3 Vote for Atrahal (Kaschan, Mockra, Serc)


8 players have not voted: Sorrit, Alkend, Kalse, Korlat, Tennes, Telas ,Liosan,Rashan

[Atrahal]

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 02:20 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:09 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Underlined one: Kasch's vote was in between. As was Mockra's (post 185). So, not three in a row. Incidentally, Kasch, you and Mockra were the 3 I had linked on beforehand. Seems I hit a nerve.
Underlined 2: very altruistic of you. Generous, even. Except that it has been consistently your point to say you don't care much for him, say he's an idiot, how the other players can profit, et cetera.
Underlined 3: so Tellan, me and Sil is apparently an organisation - then what do you make of Kasch, Mockra and you, good sir? The whole shitfest started when I linked you 3 together, after all.

When did you link me with Mockra, and Kaschan, actually? I seem to remember that the only reason we were linked was because we were all posting at the same time.

My voting post, and its reasons, was #149.
I read back through it, and still think you were and are defending Kaschan. Mockra less so, but he's been cool and collected throughout.
As for posting at the same time: yes, but that wasn't it entirely.

[Atrahal]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 02:24 PM, said:

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 02:22 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 02:18 PM, said:

no the shitfest started when you 2 voted for me for reasons that are shit...hurr durr

You realize that, in a merc game, that doesn't sound too good for you?

you mean in the sense that people are likely to target me?

As in: people will start to think you are important enough to raise a shitfest about.

EDIT: nice bragging, there, by the by.

This post has been edited by Atrahal: 06 April 2010 - 02:34 PM

[Serc]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:23 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 02:14 PM, said:

God damnit, that's what comes of using two browsers at once and being tired. XD

The argument above: Three team members cannot possibly know each other. So, yes, it's possible there's a link here, but I'm not basing my vote on "fishy feelings"

And yet you seem happy to use it to tie Tellan, moi et Sil
I still feel you are defending Kasch. You also have made no reply whatsoever to the false statement of three votes in a row (of course, what could you do but admit you're wrong?). It's gonna stick to you... so if he means so little to you, why actively defend/ attack his attackers?
If we have exhausted our arguments, if we are in a pile of WIFOM, if we only are halfway through the day, then why the vote for something you desperately want to believe us to not concern you?

As I said before, he's useful because he's loud. He makes noise, stomps around, gets reactions. He's like a bull in a shop filled with ninjas. Eventually, he's going to find one, so for the moment, he's convenient. And I'll defend him when the arguments against him consist of "He's an idiot and he's telling us how to play the game" and "LOOK, A LINK BETWEEN THREE PEOPLE."
And the vote? It's called pressure. I'm curious. You're trying to smack the ball back in my court, hard, which has my attention. You're claiming that I'm linked to Kaschan and focusing on that, instead of what I've said a couple of times, that he's loud and thus useful (at the very worst, he'll draw a night kill from his leader for being an idiot, which will still give some info).

Also, Ad Hominem.
I vote against you because I'm trying to see what your response is.
You claim I'm linked to Kaschan.
Therefore, my vote is clearly to defend Kaschan (which it won't anyway, being so obvious a defense that a five year old could see through it) instead of putting pressure on you.

Logical fallacy in action, gentlemen.

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 02:23 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 02:14 PM, said:

God damnit, that's what comes of using two browsers at once and being tired. XD

The argument above: Three team members cannot possibly know each other. So, yes, it's possible there's a link here, but I'm not basing my vote on "fishy feelings"

And yet you seem happy to use it to tie Tellan, moi et Sil
I still feel you are defending Kasch. You also have made no reply whatsoever to the false statement of three votes in a row (of course, what could you do but admit you're wrong?). It's gonna stick to you... so if he means so little to you, why actively defend/ attack his attackers?
If we have exhausted our arguments, if we are in a pile of WIFOM, if we only are halfway through the day, then why the vote for something you desperately want to believe us to not concern you?

cept the difference is that my case on you makes sense
And yours on myself is shit.

Yours was based on strawmanning mockra in saying he was telling me and only me to keep quiet or change the subject
and because i was talking about a possible 4 man hidden faction...wow...that MUST mean im not on your team!!!


My case is based on the fact that you didnt like it when i elaborated about the hidden faction ...so you could be part of that faction and not want me talking about it?
You are very certain about how many players each team has to the point of getting aggressive... a leader should be the only one who knows how many players are on his team.
Your reasons for voting foe me was dodgy at best and looks to me like its an excuse to vote as you really have ulterior reasons you cant divulge on thread.
All of this coupled with the fact you are not my leader and we have a case and a vote from me.


thank you for coming