[Kaschan]

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

erm ...how would my team know to actually do "something different"...sorry...try again.

[Atrahal]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

erm ...how would my team know to actually do "something different"...sorry...try again.

Because your post outlined what they shouldn't do? Everything else is different, after all

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

@ 193, 194 and 198: did you get so excited that you hit the reply button thrice, or were you trying to type left handed while basking in your own glory, hands down the pants style?

NO YOU!!!

[Serc]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:37 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:32 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

yawn
morning all

I thought I posted last nigth b4 going to bed, but I suppose my nets fucked up. ah well.

First off, y'all are a bunch of parrakeets, since I said the 5+5+5+1 thing in like my second post.

secondly, with that out of the way, I'm really not liking the direction in which Kas is leading the discussion. it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

meh, deffo something stinks about that whole Kas-Mockra exchange.

vote Kaschan

Remove vote

Vote Atrahal

It seems someone has over-reacted to the crapfest between Atrahal and Kaschan. If Kaschan wants to rant about how he thinks the team should play, so be it, that's usually the way teams lose, by playing in a defined set manner, so I don't care about that, but it's interesting how many people have gotten antsy about it, and his argument with Atrahal.
It was a toss-up between voting Atrahal or Tellan, but Atrahal seems the better choice, as he's online and able to defend himself.

Sure, just explain why you vote me, first
I already outlined why I went for Kasch. Must say though, I like the way the votes are splitting so far. Lots of good info.
May I also point at Kasch's apparent defeatism by stating his team will capitalize on his loss? Seems awfully premature.

Basically, your first action is to vote Kaschan, for reasons that are, to say the least, poor. If Kaschan's not on your team, as it seems, and he's not on mine, who cares what he tells his leaders to do or what he thinks? If they listen to him and follow a pattern that he posted on thread, more power to us.
Lastly "fishy exchange" is not a real argument.

[Atrahal]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:40 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

@ 193, 194 and 198: did you get so excited that you hit the reply button thrice, or were you trying to type left handed while basking in your own glory, hands down the pants style?

NO YOU!!!

Nah, I'm mildly amused, not aroused. It takes more for that than badly spelled sentences and an abundance of caps, periods and exclamation marks, combining in a mix that looks the same way bad mid-nineties porn sounds.

[Kaschan]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:40 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

erm ...how would my team know to actually do "something different"...sorry...try again.

Because your post outlined what they shouldn't do? Everything else is different, after all

what.....?
even i am confused how the hell would my "team" feel..haha

I only stated how i think a leader should play this...and hopefully he does.
simple really.

I dont see how if i am the leader my team will do the opposite of what i just said a leader SHOULD do...jeez thats some mind reading shit right thar.

[Serc]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:42 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:40 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

@ 193, 194 and 198: did you get so excited that you hit the reply button thrice, or were you trying to type left handed while basking in your own glory, hands down the pants style?

NO YOU!!!

Nah, I'm mildly amused, not aroused. It takes more for that than badly spelled sentences and an abundance of caps, periods and exclamation marks, combining in a mix that looks the same way bad mid-nineties porn sounds.

*cue repetitive bass and synth*
I'm just here to do... the plumbing.

[Mockra]

My, my, things picked up all of a sudden

[Silanah]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

erm ...how would my team know to actually do "something different"...sorry...try again.

my gut feeling do not require your silly logic and rationalization,

[Kaschan]

the third post came AFTER another one...how do you explain that shit?

[Kaschan]

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:45 PM, said:

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:39 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

erm ...how would my team know to actually do "something different"...sorry...try again.

my gut feeling do not require your silly logic and rationalization,

...clearly

[Silanah]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:46 PM, said:

the third post came AFTER another one...how do you explain that shit?

paranormal activity?


further proof ypou're EVIL

[Atrahal]

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:42 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:37 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:32 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

yawn
morning all

I thought I posted last nigth b4 going to bed, but I suppose my nets fucked up. ah well.

First off, y'all are a bunch of parrakeets, since I said the 5+5+5+1 thing in like my second post.

secondly, with that out of the way, I'm really not liking the direction in which Kas is leading the discussion. it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

meh, deffo something stinks about that whole Kas-Mockra exchange.

vote Kaschan

Remove vote

Vote Atrahal

It seems someone has over-reacted to the crapfest between Atrahal and Kaschan. If Kaschan wants to rant about how he thinks the team should play, so be it, that's usually the way teams lose, by playing in a defined set manner, so I don't care about that, but it's interesting how many people have gotten antsy about it, and his argument with Atrahal.
It was a toss-up between voting Atrahal or Tellan, but Atrahal seems the better choice, as he's online and able to defend himself.

Sure, just explain why you vote me, first
I already outlined why I went for Kasch. Must say though, I like the way the votes are splitting so far. Lots of good info.
May I also point at Kasch's apparent defeatism by stating his team will capitalize on his loss? Seems awfully premature.

Basically, your first action is to vote Kaschan, for reasons that are, to say the least, poor. If Kaschan's not on your team, as it seems, and he's not on mine, who cares what he tells his leaders to do or what he thinks? If they listen to him and follow a pattern that he posted on thread, more power to us.
Lastly "fishy exchange" is not a real argument.

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

[Mockra]

It got going with Atrahal's vote on Kaschan. Something is biting in that neighbourhood.

I would go for either one, I think it gives good odds of a good lynch. Atrahal for the reasons I said earlier (plus the extra pressure that appeared on Kaschan after our votes) or Kaschan for trying to stick the words "my leader" in more than 3/4 of his posts.

Yes, we get it, you can't be a leader because you have one, stop "playing the part".

[Kaschan]

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

It got going with Atrahal's vote on Kaschan. Something is biting in that neighbourhood.

I would go for either one, I think it gives good odds of a good lynch. Atrahal for the reasons I said earlier (plus the extra pressure that appeared on Kaschan after our votes) or Kaschan for trying to stick the words "my leader" in more than 3/4 of his posts.

Yes, we get it, you can't be a leader because you have one, stop "playing the part".

ill word my posts how i fucking please thank you very much.

Besides if i am talking about my leader how else must i say it?...."the person who leads a group" maybe? ...or what?


pfffft

[Serc]

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:42 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:37 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:32 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

yawn
morning all

I thought I posted last nigth b4 going to bed, but I suppose my nets fucked up. ah well.

First off, y'all are a bunch of parrakeets, since I said the 5+5+5+1 thing in like my second post.

secondly, with that out of the way, I'm really not liking the direction in which Kas is leading the discussion. it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

meh, deffo something stinks about that whole Kas-Mockra exchange.

vote Kaschan

Remove vote

Vote Atrahal

It seems someone has over-reacted to the crapfest between Atrahal and Kaschan. If Kaschan wants to rant about how he thinks the team should play, so be it, that's usually the way teams lose, by playing in a defined set manner, so I don't care about that, but it's interesting how many people have gotten antsy about it, and his argument with Atrahal.
It was a toss-up between voting Atrahal or Tellan, but Atrahal seems the better choice, as he's online and able to defend himself.

Sure, just explain why you vote me, first
I already outlined why I went for Kasch. Must say though, I like the way the votes are splitting so far. Lots of good info.
May I also point at Kasch's apparent defeatism by stating his team will capitalize on his loss? Seems awfully premature.

Basically, your first action is to vote Kaschan, for reasons that are, to say the least, poor. If Kaschan's not on your team, as it seems, and he's not on mine, who cares what he tells his leaders to do or what he thinks? If they listen to him and follow a pattern that he posted on thread, more power to us.
Lastly "fishy exchange" is not a real argument.

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

[Atrahal]

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:42 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:37 PM, said:

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:32 PM, said:

Silanah, on 06 April 2010 - 01:25 PM, said:

yawn
morning all

I thought I posted last nigth b4 going to bed, but I suppose my nets fucked up. ah well.

First off, y'all are a bunch of parrakeets, since I said the 5+5+5+1 thing in like my second post.

secondly, with that out of the way, I'm really not liking the direction in which Kas is leading the discussion. it's like "hey, look, this is what I think all the leaders and teams should do, so that my own team will do somehting different, *wink-wink*"

meh, deffo something stinks about that whole Kas-Mockra exchange.

vote Kaschan

Remove vote

Vote Atrahal

It seems someone has over-reacted to the crapfest between Atrahal and Kaschan. If Kaschan wants to rant about how he thinks the team should play, so be it, that's usually the way teams lose, by playing in a defined set manner, so I don't care about that, but it's interesting how many people have gotten antsy about it, and his argument with Atrahal.
It was a toss-up between voting Atrahal or Tellan, but Atrahal seems the better choice, as he's online and able to defend himself.

Sure, just explain why you vote me, first
I already outlined why I went for Kasch. Must say though, I like the way the votes are splitting so far. Lots of good info.
May I also point at Kasch's apparent defeatism by stating his team will capitalize on his loss? Seems awfully premature.

Basically, your first action is to vote Kaschan, for reasons that are, to say the least, poor. If Kaschan's not on your team, as it seems, and he's not on mine, who cares what he tells his leaders to do or what he thinks? If they listen to him and follow a pattern that he posted on thread, more power to us.
Lastly "fishy exchange" is not a real argument.

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Haven't seen a vote count in a while, but I think there just may be 2 or 3 of them on me, as well. Most certainly Kaschan and you. Incidentally, two people I'd linked before, before I had even voted Kasch

[Mockra]

Kaschan, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Mockra, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

It got going with Atrahal's vote on Kaschan. Something is biting in that neighbourhood.

I would go for either one, I think it gives good odds of a good lynch. Atrahal for the reasons I said earlier (plus the extra pressure that appeared on Kaschan after our votes) or Kaschan for trying to stick the words "my leader" in more than 3/4 of his posts.

Yes, we get it, you can't be a leader because you have one, stop "playing the part".

ill word my posts how i fucking please thank you very much.

Besides if i am talking about my leader how else must i say it?...."the person who leads a group" maybe? ...or what?


pfffft

It's not the wording, it's just that you manage to mention your "leader" no many times in your discussions you remind me of that scene in "the 40 year-old virgin" with the guy talking how awesome it is to squeeze women's breasts and how awesome they are to the touch.

[Kaschan]

The guys that base their votes off of nonsense cases are the ones id like to look at....thats the point. Your supposed to be lookinf for who are not on your team
Not who "looks scummy" or is "playing funny". You still dont know if that player is on your team or not.

In a merc game you cant go around making normal game cases. You must have alterior motives if you operate like that.

[Atrahal]

Serc, on 06 April 2010 - 01:56 PM, said:

Atrahal, on 06 April 2010 - 01:49 PM, said:

I don't know if he's not on my team, though I do think he is a bad influence if he is.
What I did notice was, when he first came on, how he spouted a crapload of shit, how he got voted for it, and how in the meantime Mockra and you did what I perceived as damage control, rather than let him go along with his antics.

You may call that bad reasoning, but I do notice how your choice for a vote was split between, oh wait... * drum roll * the two players who voted Kaschan first. It could be a coincidence. But look, you also attacked Silanah by saying he overreacted... and oh noes, he was the third to vote Kaschan.
Now, it may all be coincidence, but pardon me for stating that you do seem to be defending Kasch.

3 straight votes in a 3/4 team merc game suggests some kind of organisational structure. And I don't much care for Kaschan, I've mostly just been ignoring him, but he's loud and vocal, which acts as a good catalyst, so I don't want him dead yet. If he continues playing like this, it's not likely he'll be that hard to lynch later in the game. I'm more likely to vote on behalf of the guy who's provoked reactions than the people who are reacting. Even if he is an idiot.
As for my vote on Atrahal or Tellann, as I said, 3 votes suggests some organisational structure. I would be tempted to vote Tellann, as he's first, but it's unlikely he has a power-role, he was just throwing some pressure around, so in general, Atrahal, you would be the best vote possible., jumping on early, but not first.

Underlined one: Kasch's vote was in between. As was Mockra's (post 185). So, not three in a row. Incidentally, Kasch, you and Mockra were the 3 I had linked on beforehand. Seems I hit a nerve.
Underlined 2: very altruistic of you. Generous, even. Except that it has been consistently your point to say you don't care much for him, say he's an idiot, how the other players can profit, et cetera.
Underlined 3: so Tellan, me and Sil is apparently an organisation - then what do you make of Kasch, Mockra and you, good sir? The whole shitfest started when I linked you 3 together, after all.