[Ruse]

 Omtose, on 25 March 2010 - 05:44 PM, said:

It's also possible they were defending ruse. For example the "I doubt a leader would be a high poster" stuff.

Or thats defending himself, because if you look at the post count. Yes im leading, but Shadow and GL are still way above the rest of you, so stating that the leader wouldnt be a high poster would be something that recruits could quite easily stretch to cover him as well

[Shadow]

 Omtose, on 25 March 2010 - 05:41 PM, said:

And the first didn't get the power strip message...

Again, it was written by a different moderator. You're still reading way too much.

I never said you were scummy, but you seem to be very caught up in the details of my lynch message. If you think I'm a power player and that the Inquisition learned the identity of the lynched person pre-lynch, then it only stands to reason that you'd be pointing me out as potentially powerful to try and get me killed off. Clearly if the Inquisition didn't lynch me and knew who I was, then it would stand to reason you're trying to name as the Day Watch leader, because they probably wouldn't let that character be lynched right now with the Night Watch presumably sitting pretty.

So since you excoriated me yesterday for discussing Inquisition members I'd like to ask you why you are trying to point me out as a leader of a weak faction if you're playing with the Inquisition.

Also, would you or anyone else that bruised me yesterday care to comment about the fact that NOT ONE PERSON I mentioned as possible Inquisition yesterday got lynched? Instead, the unnamed D'riss got cut.

[Shadow]

 Osseric, on 25 March 2010 - 05:41 PM, said:

Also, that last quote he could be signaling to Serc that he has Ruse under his belt and that he shouldn't put too much thought into worrying about him.

I saw the same thing with the last post, but the rest doesn't look any more or less suspicious to me than a regular conversation between two people on thread. Factioned members often will try to associate on thread to make it seem less likely that they can talk behind closed doors.

[Shadow]

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 05:50 PM, said:

 Omtose, on 25 March 2010 - 05:44 PM, said:

It's also possible they were defending ruse. For example the "I doubt a leader would be a high poster" stuff.

Or thats defending himself, because if you look at the post count. Yes im leading, but Shadow and GL are still way above the rest of you, so stating that the leader wouldnt be a high poster would be something that recruits could quite easily stretch to cover him as well

Yep, I agree with this one. Ruse's high post count isn't any more likely to make him a leader than anyone else. He hasn't really 'led' anybody, IMO, either. I don't recall him being an early adopter on many trains.

I probably should do a vote research just to see how it has gone over the last 5 days.

[Osseric]

Well, at least we are getting in some good convo. I wish Alk and Fener would show up to lend their views.

[Ruse]

 Shadow, on 25 March 2010 - 05:53 PM, said:

Also, would you or anyone else that bruised me yesterday care to comment about the fact that NOT ONE PERSON I mentioned as possible Inquisition yesterday got lynched? Instead, the unnamed D'riss got cut.

Hmmm thats a good point, iirc it was GL who pointed out that you could have been puposefully not mentioning D'riss because he was your leader.

[Osseric]

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 07:02 PM, said:

 Shadow, on 25 March 2010 - 05:53 PM, said:

Also, would you or anyone else that bruised me yesterday care to comment about the fact that NOT ONE PERSON I mentioned as possible Inquisition yesterday got lynched? Instead, the unnamed D'riss got cut.

Hmmm thats a good point, iirc it was GL who pointed out that you could have been puposefully not mentioning D'riss because he was your leader.

Bingo ( But I mentioned it too) and Gamelon, though he just agreed with me.



EDIT: Added Gamelon

This post has been edited by Osseric: 25 March 2010 - 07:06 PM

[Shadow]

That should also say 'killed' not lynched, but I think you guys figured it out.

[Ruse]

That did confuse me at first but i eventually figured out what you meant

[Ruse]

Gah stupid double posting !

This post has been edited by Ruse: 25 March 2010 - 07:11 PM

[Shadow]

Ruse C-C-C-Combo Breaker!

edit: Damn your editing.

This post has been edited by Shadow: 25 March 2010 - 07:13 PM

[Ruse]

Your post is 2 minutes after my edit apparently how long did it take you to type that

[Osseric]

Ruse, how do you feel about a GL vote? If not him, who are your other suspects?

[Gamelon]

 Osseric, on 25 March 2010 - 07:04 PM, said:

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 07:02 PM, said:

 Shadow, on 25 March 2010 - 05:53 PM, said:

Also, would you or anyone else that bruised me yesterday care to comment about the fact that NOT ONE PERSON I mentioned as possible Inquisition yesterday got lynched? Instead, the unnamed D'riss got cut.

Hmmm thats a good point, iirc it was GL who pointed out that you could have been puposefully not mentioning D'riss because he was your leader.

Bingo ( But I mentioned it too) and Gamelon, though he just agreed with me.



EDIT: Added Gamelon

Yeah I did, but GL mentioned it before you.

What the ________ are you two talking about?

[Shadow]

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 07:15 PM, said:

Your post is 2 minutes after my edit apparently how long did it take you to type that

Only 1 minute after.

[Ruse]

Im not sure, i think he could be a leader definitely but im not sold on which one yet.

[Ruse]

 Shadow, on 25 March 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 07:15 PM, said:

Your post is 2 minutes after my edit apparently how long did it take you to type that

Only 1 minute after.

oh right i looked at the post time, thats slightly more acceptable

[Osseric]

Here is the thing,

if we lynch DW, lynch won't go through
If we lynch Un recruited, lynch won't go through
If we lynch inquisitor, lynch won't go through.


Kinda frustrating. I think we might be near a tipping point, and if we don't get at least, a NW recruit we are going down.

[Osseric]

If we wanted to bide our time, and get a NW recruit because we are unsure of the ability to get a lynch on NW, I would suggest Serc. If he isn't a NW recruit, i'll eat me shoes

[Osseric]

 Gamelon, on 25 March 2010 - 07:18 PM, said:

 Osseric, on 25 March 2010 - 07:04 PM, said:

 Ruse, on 25 March 2010 - 07:02 PM, said:

 Shadow, on 25 March 2010 - 05:53 PM, said:

Also, would you or anyone else that bruised me yesterday care to comment about the fact that NOT ONE PERSON I mentioned as possible Inquisition yesterday got lynched? Instead, the unnamed D'riss got cut.

Hmmm thats a good point, iirc it was GL who pointed out that you could have been puposefully not mentioning D'riss because he was your leader.

Bingo ( But I mentioned it too) and Gamelon, though he just agreed with me.



EDIT: Added Gamelon

Yeah I did, but GL mentioned it before you.

What the ________ are you two talking about?

Basically Ruse is pointing out that GL brought up the fact that D'riss was completely never mentioned throughout the game, was being skimmed over, and that he would be a likely candidate for a leader. Then the next day, D'riss turns up dead. Which could be a leader going after another leader by following his own logic. (Which of course will prompt GL to come on thread and state "I would never be so obvious!! Clearly i am not a leader!!"