[Hood's Path]

Also, if you so wish I will quite happy start spamming.

[Hood's Path]

Because apparently that's less scummy.

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

[Hood's Path]

Because scum crack under pressure if they have to post lots.

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

Yes I do disagree with that.

I find that a scum player who isn't some sort of mafia incompetent could hide fine-post quantity matters little. Generally scum think about what they post they try to fit in with the innos. Yes they slip up. However generaly they do try and fit in-and that includes having a post count not seen as scummy.

In fact it's probably easier for scum to hide in mid/high range, because they can just shout "lowposters, look, OMG!!!"

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

Yes I do disagree with that.

I find that a scum player who isn't some sort of mafia incompetent could hide fine-post quantity matters little. Generally scum think about what they post they try to fit in with the innos. Yes they slip up. However generaly they do try and fit in-and that includes having a post count not seen as scummy.

In fact it's probably easier for scum to hide in mid/high range, because they can just shout "lowposters, look, OMG!!!"

Ok chuckles, what do you think of the game so far? Do you think its fun with noone posting much of anything, and everyone hiding?

Who do you want to lynch today, and why? who are your suspects?

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:15 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

If scum can't lose if they don't post, why do they ever post?

And if you're saying i'm being middle of the road, maybe try learning to read.

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:18 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

Yes I do disagree with that.

I find that a scum player who isn't some sort of mafia incompetent could hide fine-post quantity matters little. Generally scum think about what they post they try to fit in with the innos. Yes they slip up. However generaly they do try and fit in-and that includes having a post count not seen as scummy.

In fact it's probably easier for scum to hide in mid/high range, because they can just shout "lowposters, look, OMG!!!"

Ok chuckles, what do you think of the game so far? Do you think its fun with noone posting much of anything, and everyone hiding?

Who do you want to lynch today, and why? who are your suspects?

If no-one can fuck up when they're not posting it makes sense for the innos not to post.

Who do I want to lynch today?

Well you would be the obvious one-since you seem to be trying to steer the game.

On the other hand I may have an inherent bias against people who whinge when people have less time than them.

Couple of posts I dislike.

Eloth, on Aug 26 2009, 04:25 PM, said:

OK, so we have a guard then. Cool. I was thinking this was a simpler game from reading Morgy's roles post.

Instantly assumes a guard-which since it's not a certainty seems a bad move-if the guard is tricked into thinking that he guarded someone the night before and was successful it makes it more likely he'll come forward.

Korvalain, on Aug 26 2009, 04:30 PM, said:

HEALER AND GUARD DO NOT COME FORWARD.

This bit struck me as something that was trying too hard to be innocent.

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:15 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

If scum can't lose if they don't post, why do they ever post?

And if you're saying i'm being middle of the road, maybe try learning to read.

I enjoy that you can't even keep up with the thread.

I never said you were middle of the road, perhaps I am not the one who needs reading lessons?

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:18 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

Yes I do disagree with that.

I find that a scum player who isn't some sort of mafia incompetent could hide fine-post quantity matters little. Generally scum think about what they post they try to fit in with the innos. Yes they slip up. However generaly they do try and fit in-and that includes having a post count not seen as scummy.

In fact it's probably easier for scum to hide in mid/high range, because they can just shout "lowposters, look, OMG!!!"

Ok chuckles, what do you think of the game so far? Do you think its fun with noone posting much of anything, and everyone hiding?

Who do you want to lynch today, and why? who are your suspects?

If no-one can fuck up when they're not posting it makes sense for the innos not to post.

Who do I want to lynch today?

Well you would be the obvious one-since you seem to be trying to steer the game.

On the other hand I may have an inherent bias against people who whinge when people have less time than them.

Couple of posts I dislike.

Eloth, on Aug 26 2009, 04:25 PM, said:

OK, so we have a guard then. Cool. I was thinking this was a simpler game from reading Morgy's roles post.

Instantly assumes a guard-which since it's not a certainty seems a bad move-if the guard is tricked into thinking that he guarded someone the night before and was successful it makes it more likely he'll come forward.

Korvalain, on Aug 26 2009, 04:30 PM, said:

HEALER AND GUARD DO NOT COME FORWARD.

This bit struck me as something that was trying too hard to be innocent.

Trying to stear the game = because I actually post instead of lurking? Interesting.

So, me assuming that the guard guarded the SK, and telling them to guard them again tonight but not come forward is somehow innocent and scummy at the same time?

I'm not whining that you have less time, I am saying that 4 posts a day is not enough to play mafia, not by a long shot. And of course all you do is whine 'oh meta meta meta QQQQ'. I am saying I don't care about your meta circumstances, I am saying that if you cannot participate in the game, then I will take you out so that you cannot hide until the end of hte game and turn out to be a lurking, lying killer.

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:26 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:15 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

If scum can't lose if they don't post, why do they ever post?

And if you're saying i'm being middle of the road, maybe try learning to read.

I enjoy that you can't even keep up with the thread.

I never said you were middle of the road, perhaps I am not the one who needs reading lessons?

"Post like a little girl..." is an attack on how I post.

If it is not just general stupid name calling, it shows you have a problem with how I post. The wording would lead me to think of middle of the road posting since the afraid part suggests someone unwilling to voice strong opinions or get too involved.

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:28 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:26 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:15 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

If scum can't lose if they don't post, why do they ever post?

And if you're saying i'm being middle of the road, maybe try learning to read.

I enjoy that you can't even keep up with the thread.

I never said you were middle of the road, perhaps I am not the one who needs reading lessons?

"Post like a little girl..." is an attack on how I post.

If it is not just general stupid name calling, it shows you have a problem with how I post. The wording would lead me to think of middle of the road posting since the afraid part suggests someone unwilling to voice strong opinions or get too involved.

'posts like a little girl afraid to wet her pants' is I believe, the direct quote.

Which you were doing yesterday for sure, and seemed to be doing today as well.

I am happy you actually did a game content post that wasn't a summary or a drive-by vote.

Good job!

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:28 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:18 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:17 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:11 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:09 PM, said:

Protip: Hyperbole and meta-whining do not a good defense make.

Protip: Patronising twattishness does not make a good offense make.

Programmartip: It should be does you arse.

Look at how cute you are, arguing about grammar.

I'm impressed though, you are getting close to 10 posts in this entire game. At this rate you might break 15 before day 3 is over!

Scum can hide with 50 posts a day, but it is much harder and they are much more likely to make mistakes.

It is hard to make a mistake when you post 4 times a day. Do you disagree with that?

Yes I do disagree with that.

I find that a scum player who isn't some sort of mafia incompetent could hide fine-post quantity matters little. Generally scum think about what they post they try to fit in with the innos. Yes they slip up. However generaly they do try and fit in-and that includes having a post count not seen as scummy.

In fact it's probably easier for scum to hide in mid/high range, because they can just shout "lowposters, look, OMG!!!"

Ok chuckles, what do you think of the game so far? Do you think its fun with noone posting much of anything, and everyone hiding?

Who do you want to lynch today, and why? who are your suspects?

If no-one can fuck up when they're not posting it makes sense for the innos not to post.

Who do I want to lynch today?

Well you would be the obvious one-since you seem to be trying to steer the game.

On the other hand I may have an inherent bias against people who whinge when people have less time than them.

Couple of posts I dislike.

Eloth, on Aug 26 2009, 04:25 PM, said:

OK, so we have a guard then. Cool. I was thinking this was a simpler game from reading Morgy's roles post.

Instantly assumes a guard-which since it's not a certainty seems a bad move-if the guard is tricked into thinking that he guarded someone the night before and was successful it makes it more likely he'll come forward.

Korvalain, on Aug 26 2009, 04:30 PM, said:

HEALER AND GUARD DO NOT COME FORWARD.

This bit struck me as something that was trying too hard to be innocent.

Trying to stear the game = because I actually post instead of lurking? Interesting.

So, me assuming that the guard guarded the SK, and telling them to guard them again tonight but not come forward is somehow innocent and scummy at the same time?

I'm not whining that you have less time, I am saying that 4 posts a day is not enough to play mafia, not by a long shot. And of course all you do is whine 'oh meta meta meta QQQQ'. I am saying I don't care about your meta circumstances, I am saying that if you cannot participate in the game, then I will take you out so that you cannot hide until the end of hte game and turn out to be a lurking, lying killer.

You will take me out? Assumes either a killing power or a control of the game.

As for trying to steer the game, no not because you post, simply because you try to force lynches, and try and get people to go along with you-or so it seems to me.

Also, you saying guard not come forward struck me as stating the obvious-so why state the obvious? To appear innocent.

This post has been edited by Hood's Path: 27 August 2009 - 07:32 PM

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:29 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:28 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 03:26 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:19 PM, said:

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:15 PM, said:

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:13 PM, said:

Because apparently that's less scummy.

No, I want you to have more than 4 content posts while we are in day 2. See how that works?

You can't fuck up when you don't post, and you post like a little girl who is afraid to wet herself.

Grats on lurking on the hopes that your scumminess isn't detected.

If scum can't lose if they don't post, why do they ever post?

And if you're saying i'm being middle of the road, maybe try learning to read.

I enjoy that you can't even keep up with the thread.

I never said you were middle of the road, perhaps I am not the one who needs reading lessons?

"Post like a little girl..." is an attack on how I post.

If it is not just general stupid name calling, it shows you have a problem with how I post. The wording would lead me to think of middle of the road posting since the afraid part suggests someone unwilling to voice strong opinions or get too involved.

'posts like a little girl afraid to wet her pants' is I believe, the direct quote.

Which you were doing yesterday for sure, and seemed to be doing today as well.

I am happy you actually did a game content post that wasn't a summary or a drive-by vote.

Good job!

Yes, so in fact I was up to date and your name calling was pointless.

[Hood's Path]

Also, what is giving your reasons for a vote, or your opinion on who you think scummy and inno, if not a game summary.

[Korvalain]

Honestly, if I was a guard and in a game with 2 killing factions, on a night with no kills I would think about coming forward with who I guarded thinking that perhaps I found a killer.

So, I am saying don't come forward tonight, come forward tomorrow if there is again no kill tonight, or possibly waiting until day 4 if there is no double kill ever (night 1, 2, or 3) because you either have the killer if there is only one, or the SK.

I will take you out. Hanging = taking you out. That of course assumes I can swing a lynch on you, but judging by the sheeple attitude so far, it shouldn't be very hard to swing a lynch on anyone since people just pop up at the end of day to vote for whoever has the most votes on them for 'the sake of a lynch'.

[Hood's Path]

That take me out post certainly seems odd.

Perhaps you are indeed a killer incompetent enough to slip due to posting a lot.

[Korvalain]

Hood's Path, on Aug 27 2009, 02:33 PM, said:

Also, what is giving your reasons for a vote, or your opinion on who you think scummy and inno, if not a game summary.

....

A Game summary is not good 'content'. It is hoping to be content and hoping to hide as a helpful poster.

Giving reasons for a vote is game content, unless it is a drive by, 'to-lynch' vote. Then it is just bullshit while you hope to fit in.

See how that works?

Hoods Path said:

That take me out post certainly seems odd.

Perhaps you are indeed a killer incompetent enough to slip due to posting a lot.

If you really think that, then vote for me. Oh wait, you already are for purely OMGUS reasons. Grats on that.

If you think you know who I am (which you honestly should by now), then you should also know I'm not nearly that bad at this game.

[Hood's Path]

Korvalain, on Aug 27 2009, 02:34 PM, said:

Honestly, if I was a guard and in a game with 2 killing factions, on a night with no kills I would think about coming forward with who I guarded thinking that perhaps I found a killer.

So, I am saying don't come forward tonight, come forward tomorrow if there is again no kill tonight, or possibly waiting until day 4 if there is no double kill ever (night 1, 2, or 3) because you either have the killer if there is only one, or the SK.

I will take you out. Hanging = taking you out. That of course assumes I can swing a lynch on you, but judging by the sheeple attitude so far, it shouldn't be very hard to swing a lynch on anyone since people just pop up at the end of day to vote for whoever has the most votes on them for 'the sake of a lynch'.

This still assumes you can make me have the most votes. You seem rather confident you could manage that-especially considering the sheeple attitudes and the fact you have more votes than me so the sheeple logic would get you lynched not me.

Unless you've got a voting block of course.