Mafia 50: The Yellow Turban Rebellion Long live the Way of Peace
#301
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:31 PM
Yes, he can't get to the end, but if we hit him and he's scum, we get more info than running around looking for others and only finding innos. Oh, and I was wrong, it's not testable.
I doubt the killers would kill him, they know if they wait we'll lynch him.
Also, this is meant to be Meat and Potatoes. I doubt that role would be in it.
Just not buying it.
I doubt the killers would kill him, they know if they wait we'll lynch him.
Also, this is meant to be Meat and Potatoes. I doubt that role would be in it.
Just not buying it.
#302
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:31 PM
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 04:22 PM, said:
I was thinking the same. I can't see it tbh.
However, I'm seeing HP maybe as more likely a symp now, since I reckon a killer would claim a more standard role, but since symp knows will CF inno.
I'm unsure. It is testable, but if he's telling the truth and we test and he comes up true, he'd die anyhow as killers wouldn't let us keep the CI-so I think it might be more worthwhile to go for the lynch and get info now anyhow.
However, I'm seeing HP maybe as more likely a symp now, since I reckon a killer would claim a more standard role, but since symp knows will CF inno.
I'm unsure. It is testable, but if he's telling the truth and we test and he comes up true, he'd die anyhow as killers wouldn't let us keep the CI-so I think it might be more worthwhile to go for the lynch and get info now anyhow.
Are you kidding me? Did you just suggest we lynch the guy who we know would be a prime killer target if he's truthful? What, so the killers can target someone else they think might be dangerous?
#304
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:32 PM
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:29 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 28 2009, 09:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
You are a stupid person.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
Didn't he say that he couldn't give a role to the same person twice? If so we'll catch him by day 4.
With 5 dead by then. 3 scum, 4 innos. We lynch, 2 scum, 4 innos. Kill, 2 scum, 3 innos, and it's do or die.
I'd rather not.
how can anyone actually listening to this idiot? if you dont lynch me, you will lose me in the night and get the cf and have a possible healer tomorrow night. if you do lynch me, you lose an inno role, another inno during the night, and have no possibility for a heal.
only players that see that as a plus are the scum.
#305
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:32 PM
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:30 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:28 PM, said:
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:25 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:22 PM, said:
I was thinking the same. I can't see it tbh.
However, I'm seeing HP maybe as more likely a symp now, since I reckon a killer would claim a more standard role, but since symp knows will CF inno.
I'm unsure. It is testable, but if he's telling the truth and we test and he comes up true, he'd die anyhow as killers wouldn't let us keep the CI-so I think it might be more worthwhile to go for the lynch and get info now anyhow.
However, I'm seeing HP maybe as more likely a symp now, since I reckon a killer would claim a more standard role, but since symp knows will CF inno.
I'm unsure. It is testable, but if he's telling the truth and we test and he comes up true, he'd die anyhow as killers wouldn't let us keep the CI-so I think it might be more worthwhile to go for the lynch and get info now anyhow.
i could have lied and said i could target yellow army as well which would have saved me, but without a lynch i at least get to give someone the power to heal on night 2.
To be honest i'd prefer a lynch now to a heal on night 2. The chances of a heal working are small, I think the information would help us more.
what information? if i am still alive tomorrow i will be lynch, so all you are doing is talking out a possible heal oppurtunity on night 2 and garaunteeing another inno dies tonight by lynching me.
YOU ARE SO SCUMMY IT FUCKING HURTS, either that or your dense.
Not if you are scum, whereas it helps us. Do you find it impossible to see things from others point of view. Even if you know you're innocent, that doesn't mean everyone does.
#306
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:33 PM
#307
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:34 PM
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:32 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:29 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 28 2009, 09:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
You are a stupid person.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
Didn't he say that he couldn't give a role to the same person twice? If so we'll catch him by day 4.
With 5 dead by then. 3 scum, 4 innos. We lynch, 2 scum, 4 innos. Kill, 2 scum, 3 innos, and it's do or die.
I'd rather not.
how can anyone actually listening to this idiot? if you dont lynch me, you will lose me in the night.
Unlikely in my opinion. The role isn't that strong.
Why wouldn't the scum just take out someone else and let us waste another day tommorow lynching you.
Also, consider, the kill is usually the last action to go through, so even if they killed you tonight, we could still get the action, so it benefits them to kill someone else and let you be lynched.
#308
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:34 PM
Agreed. However, a question. Why Serc?
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
This post has been edited by Kaschan: 28 July 2009 - 08:35 PM
#310
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:36 PM
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:32 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:29 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 28 2009, 09:28 PM, said:
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:27 PM, said:
You are a stupid person.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
The idea is that you do not tell anyone today. Because if you do and are a killer, you can then kill them, go "oh surprise" and avoid a lynch perhaps tommorow.
You give a role to someone tonight, and DO NOT SAY WHO ON THREAD.
Tommorow, you come on and tell everyone who you gave it to. Since the killers would have no way of knowing who, they will most likely still be alive, and can come on after you and confirm they were given a role.
Simple.
Or so I thought, I have now seen a flaw.
You could just name one of your partners, and they would go along with you.
I don't buy your role, and it is not possible to test it.
Vote Hoods Path.
Didn't he say that he couldn't give a role to the same person twice? If so we'll catch him by day 4.
With 5 dead by then. 3 scum, 4 innos. We lynch, 2 scum, 4 innos. Kill, 2 scum, 3 innos, and it's do or die.
I'd rather not.
how can anyone actually listening to this idiot? if you dont lynch me, you will lose me in the night and get the cf and have a possible healer tomorrow night. if you do lynch me, you lose an inno role, another inno during the night, and have no possibility for a heal.
only players that see that as a plus are the scum.
Also, you are manipulating the way you say it.
If we don't lycnh you and you're scum on the other hand:
You get a ride until tommorow-we lose a lynch and have no information. So the killers get a free kill.
#311
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:36 PM
Kaschan, on Jul 28 2009, 09:34 PM, said:
Agreed. However, a question. Why Serc?
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
most votes after me and had a possibly train on him earlier for scumminess. also was after emurlahn so inno might give you some info toward emur for tomorrow as well.
driss would be best but not a possibility with the time and numbers.
#312
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:36 PM
#314
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:38 PM
try not to cry to hard, you will like having a heal ability, maybe teach you some humility.
#315
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:38 PM
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:36 PM, said:
Kaschan, on Jul 28 2009, 09:34 PM, said:
Agreed. However, a question. Why Serc?
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
most votes after me and had a possibly train on him earlier for scumminess. also was after emurlahn so inno might give you some info toward emur for tomorrow as well.
driss would be best but not a possibility with the time and numbers.
Why would d'riss be best?
Why is attacking you for having a shit case scummy.
The worst you have called me is emurs symp. Thus surely emur would be better.
Now you're getting inconsistent, not going for the people that by your reasoning would be best, but instead saying me, the one attacking you.
#316
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:38 PM
#317
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:38 PM
I love how someone reveals with a testable role, D'riss, and you're only pushing harder now.
Remove vote
Vote Serc
More reasonable option IMO.
Remove vote
Vote Serc
More reasonable option IMO.
#318
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:39 PM
D'riss, on Jul 28 2009, 09:38 PM, said:
Hood's Path, on Jul 28 2009, 09:36 PM, said:
Kaschan, on Jul 28 2009, 09:34 PM, said:
Agreed. However, a question. Why Serc?
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
Edit: X-post @Sorrit.
most votes after me and had a possibly train on him earlier for scumminess. also was after emurlahn so inno might give you some info toward emur for tomorrow as well.
driss would be best but not a possibility with the time and numbers.
Why would d'riss be best?
Why is attacking you for having a shit case scummy.
The worst you have called me is emurs symp. Thus surely emur would be better.
Now you're getting inconsistent, not going for the people that by your reasoning would be best, but instead saying me, the one attacking you.
i have said numerous times there is no symp. you are partnered to emur or fake symping him to ally with a cf inno if he was lynched. and i did switch my vote to you after your levels of bullshit got too much for me.
#319
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:40 PM
Lol at least a whole page of replies and lots of votes in the 40 minute drive home...
It is Day 1. 1 hours, 21 minutes remaining.
12 players still alive: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Galayn Lord, Hood's Path, Karatallid, Kaschan, Omtose, Ruse, Serc, Sorrit, Thyrllan
7 votes to lynch. 6 votes to go to night.
3 votes Hood's Path (D'riss, Thyrllan, Emurlahn)
1 vote Thyrllan (Serc)
4 votes Serc (Karatallid, Galayn Lord, Sorrit, Hood's Path)
1 vote Galayn Lord (Ampelas)
Not voted: Omtose, Ruse, Kaschan
(I think that's right)
It is Day 1. 1 hours, 21 minutes remaining.
12 players still alive: Ampelas, D'riss, Emurlahn, Galayn Lord, Hood's Path, Karatallid, Kaschan, Omtose, Ruse, Serc, Sorrit, Thyrllan
7 votes to lynch. 6 votes to go to night.
3 votes Hood's Path (D'riss, Thyrllan, Emurlahn)
1 vote Thyrllan (Serc)
4 votes Serc (Karatallid, Galayn Lord, Sorrit, Hood's Path)
1 vote Galayn Lord (Ampelas)
Not voted: Omtose, Ruse, Kaschan
(I think that's right)
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#320
Posted 28 July 2009 - 08:40 PM
Fuck it. Serc pinged my scumdar and I voted HP for info and didn't think he was scummy.
Vote Serc.
Vote Serc.