Mafia 49: Highlander There can be only One!
#282
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:27 PM
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:23 PM, said:
Ok well i really dont get the case on ehmurlahn?
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
#2 on Emur? Barghast took the easy way out of vote and leave, not to be back for hours. Clean cut and low-profile and voting on a surprisingly laid out case for day 1 so it wouldn't appear that strange really.
Like i said, we never lynch right on day 1,e ver. So why not do soething different and maybe get it right.
#283
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:27 PM
Okay, had a hell of an emotional day yesterday, and now I'm rushing to an early ass eye-doctor appointment, but I shouldn't be long. Will finally get into this when I return.
#284
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:28 PM
#285
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:28 PM
#286
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:28 PM
Karosis has 15 posts. And his first post:
Why the fuck is he quoting Silanah here? And then he goes on to hop on Silanah's case...
Hmmmm.
Fuck it. He's trying to drag the game around, and Karosis seems eager to suck his dick the entire way there.
Vote Silanah
Karosis, on Jul 15 2009, 07:35 PM, said:
Why the fuck is he quoting Silanah here? And then he goes on to hop on Silanah's case...
Hmmmm.
Fuck it. He's trying to drag the game around, and Karosis seems eager to suck his dick the entire way there.
Vote Silanah
#287
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:30 PM
Sorrit, on Jul 16 2009, 02:27 PM, said:
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:23 PM, said:
Ok well i really dont get the case on ehmurlahn?
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
#2 on Emur? Barghast took the easy way out of vote and leave, not to be back for hours. Clean cut and low-profile and voting on a surprisingly laid out case for day 1 so it wouldn't appear that strange really.
Like i said, we never lynch right on day 1,e ver. So why not do soething different and maybe get it right.
im not sure what you are saying....are you agreeing with me or what....cause i am pretty much saying what you are.
#288
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:30 PM
Atrahal, on Jul 16 2009, 01:24 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 16 2009, 09:17 PM, said:
Actually, lynching someone polite and smooth that might not be a bad idea. it would take us in a different direction than usual, and we never lynch right on day 1 anyways.
Ampelas for example is clean and professional and comes off as no one in particular. Barghast did some light spamming and then made some speculation. I'm not saying they're perfect candidates, but seriously when are scum ever really obvious expecially on day 1?
Ampelas for example is clean and professional and comes off as no one in particular. Barghast did some light spamming and then made some speculation. I'm not saying they're perfect candidates, but seriously when are scum ever really obvious expecially on day 1?
or look at the trend of scum leading the game a lot recently (obdi in deepgate, PB in locke lamora, etc) - maybe we should vote sil off?
This is true too. smart and reasoned posting has managed to lull people recently
#289
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:31 PM
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:30 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 16 2009, 02:27 PM, said:
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:23 PM, said:
Ok well i really dont get the case on ehmurlahn?
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
#2 on Emur? Barghast took the easy way out of vote and leave, not to be back for hours. Clean cut and low-profile and voting on a surprisingly laid out case for day 1 so it wouldn't appear that strange really.
Like i said, we never lynch right on day 1,e ver. So why not do soething different and maybe get it right.
im not sure what you are saying....are you agreeing with me or what....cause i am pretty much saying what you are.
Right, I'm agreeing with you and suggesting the #2 vote on emur which is barghast as a possibel.
#290
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:32 PM
here's the vote post on barg where he gives a reason for voting emur over game and then immediately points out that its not a reason at all leading me to wonder why he bothered saying it then
edit: browser deleted my text first time
Barghast, on Jul 16 2009, 06:54 PM, said:
Well, I won't be on for deadline. This I know. I'll leave you all with a vote, (though very hard to choose between Gam and the case on Emur);
Vote Emurlahn
Because it has more substance, and we can keep an eye on Gam for further strange behaviour as the game progresses. 'Course, we can keep an eye on Emur if he survives as well. But yeah. Substance > Weird. At least this time, for me.
Vote Emurlahn
Because it has more substance, and we can keep an eye on Gam for further strange behaviour as the game progresses. 'Course, we can keep an eye on Emur if he survives as well. But yeah. Substance > Weird. At least this time, for me.
edit: browser deleted my text first time
This post has been edited by Atrahal: 16 July 2009 - 01:33 PM
#291
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:32 PM
In this game especially i can see a killer taking charge....since he wants to kill other killers just as much as we do.
#292
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:34 PM
Sorrit, on Jul 16 2009, 02:31 PM, said:
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:30 PM, said:
Sorrit, on Jul 16 2009, 02:27 PM, said:
Karatallid, on Jul 16 2009, 01:23 PM, said:
Ok well i really dont get the case on ehmurlahn?
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
and The gamelon case is really a nothing case.
If i had to lynch someone...I would rather go for one of the players who was more than happy to vote any one of these two pityful cases.
A guy thats been low profile, but happy to lynch just about whoever.
#2 on Emur? Barghast took the easy way out of vote and leave, not to be back for hours. Clean cut and low-profile and voting on a surprisingly laid out case for day 1 so it wouldn't appear that strange really.
Like i said, we never lynch right on day 1,e ver. So why not do soething different and maybe get it right.
im not sure what you are saying....are you agreeing with me or what....cause i am pretty much saying what you are.
Right, I'm agreeing with you and suggesting the #2 vote on emur which is barghast as a possibel.
aaah ok....yea
definite possibility....especially since it was barghast who got gamelon all befuddled on page one...
#293
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:35 PM
Vote Barghast
That quote of him posted by atra looks like someone hedging his bets.
That quote of him posted by atra looks like someone hedging his bets.
#294
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:35 PM
Barghast strikes me more as an eager sheep. Which could just as easily point to lazy inno play, IMO.
edit: xpost with Hal's (heh) quote. You make a good point there, along with Sorrit. Then again, that seems like exactly what Silanah's accusing me of, isn't it (hedging bets)?
edit: xpost with Hal's (heh) quote. You make a good point there, along with Sorrit. Then again, that seems like exactly what Silanah's accusing me of, isn't it (hedging bets)?
This post has been edited by Emurlahn: 16 July 2009 - 01:36 PM
#295
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:36 PM
Ok....so we could vote silanah for trying to take charge early, or barghast for fitting the killer day one profile.
I prefer barghast to be honest...that vote he placed is real "half hearted" if you ask me
I prefer barghast to be honest...that vote he placed is real "half hearted" if you ask me
#296
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:36 PM
#297
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:38 PM
#298
#299
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:39 PM
I find that one day one people are allot less prone to be sheep simply because of the lack of information
#300
Posted 16 July 2009 - 01:40 PM