Malazan Empire: James Camerons "AVATAR" (2009 film) - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 12 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

James Camerons "AVATAR" (2009 film) Awesomest sci-fi film or Awesomest sci-fi film?

#121 User is offline   Yellow 

  • Sick and Tired
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,703
  • Joined: 22-February 05

Posted 23 December 2009 - 10:48 AM

View PostSir Thursday, on 23 December 2009 - 01:04 AM, said:

@Yellow: This is a film that I think is probably only worth watching in the cinema in 3D. The visuals are what you should got to the cinema for - the rest is pretty weak, really. You won't get anywhere near the same experience if you watch it on a small screen in 2D, I don't think.


This is pretty much the reason why I won't bother going to see it at the cinema. I don't particularly care for tech demos, so if the plot/acting/everything else is garbage, I'm not going to spunk a tenner to go see it. I'm sure it looks great, but a film needs to have more than that, you know?

I hate watching films in 3D. I feel that having to put the glasses on detracts from the experience. Plus, the 3D tends not to work at the edges of your vision, so you have to try and ignore that while you're watching the film.

So yeah, I'll probably catch the DVD out of curiosity at some point. No big loss.
Don't fuck with the Culture.
0

#122 User is offline   Tatterdemalion 

  • I sneeze warrens.
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 461
  • Joined: 03-December 09
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Interests:Fantasy, cartography, creativity, finding a readership before I'm cast aside by history, roti.
  • Currently working on my Imbalance series.
    Web: joelminty.com
    Twitter: @JoelMinty

Posted 23 December 2009 - 04:44 PM

Here's my take:

It's amazingly enjoyable and should be seen. I was not excited to see the film, but when an old friend came to town, decided to go. I enjoyed myself - a lot. The BIGGEST mistake people are having when talking about the movie is this: The story is NOT a POOR one, it is a SIMPLE one. It is not constructed badly, filled with holes, covered in 'convenient' moments, or erratic. It IS simple, straight-forward, a story you have certainly seen told before, and not a far step from the Aliens world. It is nothing too original, but the distinction is key. I CAN'T ignore terrible storytelling, unbelievable characters or excessively awful dialog. I CAN recognize that the story is not the focus of the movie, move on, and thoroughly enjoy the breath-taking visuals and colossal scope. I like dialog-driven intelligent movies as much as the next guy - most likely more - things like District 9, Usual Suspects, Memento - I don't know, whatever. But not every movie HAS to be like those. Some can build their merit in other ways, and believe me, there are MANY different things that go into movie-making and thus many different things to excel at if you so choose. Avatar excels at many things and demands respect therefore. What makes it a definite go see is that in some visual sectors, it not only excels, it pioneers. The 3D cast me in awe. Awe is an experience not easily found on a Tuesday.

It's not the best movie of the year. But it is a landmark movie that will be remembered for being the first quality use of 3D, and if a plethora of 3D movies are to follow, they might clean it up, they might even make it look better, but that won't render Avatar obsolete, because it was first. They will be followers. They will be imitations. They will be Jurassic Park III to Jurassic Park. They will be 2012 to Independence Day. They will be some god-awful '80s sci-fi to Star Wars. And if you see Avatar in 3D, you can come to appreciate just a little of what audiences were experiencing in 1977 when a colossal Star Destroyer thundered overhead and changed what people thought movies could do.

To me, that's easily enough to justify a story about a guy 'going native.'
Author of Purge of Ashes.
Sayer of "And Nature shall not abide."

2

#123 User is offline   dktorode 

  • Luck is my middle name, Mind you, my first name is Bad."
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 2,188
  • Joined: 03-September 05

Posted 23 December 2009 - 04:52 PM

View PostYellow, on 23 December 2009 - 10:48 AM, said:

View PostSir Thursday, on 23 December 2009 - 01:04 AM, said:

@Yellow: This is a film that I think is probably only worth watching in the cinema in 3D. The visuals are what you should got to the cinema for - the rest is pretty weak, really. You won't get anywhere near the same experience if you watch it on a small screen in 2D, I don't think.


This is pretty much the reason why I won't bother going to see it at the cinema. I don't particularly care for tech demos, so if the plot/acting/everything else is garbage, I'm not going to spunk a tenner to go see it. I'm sure it looks great, but a film needs to have more than that, you know?

I hate watching films in 3D. I feel that having to put the glasses on detracts from the experience. Plus, the 3D tends not to work at the edges of your vision, so you have to try and ignore that while you're watching the film.

So yeah, I'll probably catch the DVD out of curiosity at some point. No big loss.


You sound like a friend of mine who refused to go watch 300 on the big screen for similar reasons.
He is super pissed at himself now that he didnt... Go watch it on Imax 3D...The 3D technology used is the best ever produced you wont have the same problems as before...you will more than likely regret not watching it if you dont and then "catch it somtime" on your lifeless tele.
...┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...

Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?
0

#124 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 24 December 2009 - 12:10 AM

View Postdktorode, on 23 December 2009 - 04:52 PM, said:

View PostYellow, on 23 December 2009 - 10:48 AM, said:

View PostSir Thursday, on 23 December 2009 - 01:04 AM, said:

@Yellow: This is a film that I think is probably only worth watching in the cinema in 3D. The visuals are what you should got to the cinema for - the rest is pretty weak, really. You won't get anywhere near the same experience if you watch it on a small screen in 2D, I don't think.


This is pretty much the reason why I won't bother going to see it at the cinema. I don't particularly care for tech demos, so if the plot/acting/everything else is garbage, I'm not going to spunk a tenner to go see it. I'm sure it looks great, but a film needs to have more than that, you know?

I hate watching films in 3D. I feel that having to put the glasses on detracts from the experience. Plus, the 3D tends not to work at the edges of your vision, so you have to try and ignore that while you're watching the film.

So yeah, I'll probably catch the DVD out of curiosity at some point. No big loss.


You sound like a friend of mine who refused to go watch 300 on the big screen for similar reasons.
He is super pissed at himself now that he didnt... Go watch it on Imax 3D...The 3D technology used is the best ever produced you wont have the same problems as before...you will more than likely regret not watching it if you dont and then "catch it somtime" on your lifeless tele.


Agreed, the 3D is far superior to what's come out so far. The Stereoscopic cameras Cameron shot with are meant to mimic the human eye and the depth it sees when someone is sitting in front of you and it really did make a difference to me, cause I get annoyed by regular 3D usually too.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#125 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 24 December 2009 - 12:26 AM

AVATAR has taken 300 million in 4 days since release....The 16 million it pulled down for Tuesday alone is the second-highest number for a non-opening film ever (behind The Dark Knight's $20.9 million)

http://www.comingsoo...ws.php?id=61819

I wonder if a lot of folk like this flick or something. :p

This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 24 December 2009 - 12:28 AM

"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#126 User is offline   dktorode 

  • Luck is my middle name, Mind you, my first name is Bad."
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 2,188
  • Joined: 03-September 05

Posted 24 December 2009 - 08:25 AM

View PostQuickTidal, on 24 December 2009 - 12:26 AM, said:


I wonder if a lot of folk like this flick or something. :p


When you spend 150 mil on maketing...you tend to get results :p
...┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...

Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?
0

#127 User is offline   Yellow 

  • Sick and Tired
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,703
  • Joined: 22-February 05

Posted 24 December 2009 - 10:09 AM

View PostQuickTidal, on 24 December 2009 - 12:26 AM, said:

I wonder if a lot of folk like this flick or something. :p


A lot of people liked Titanic as well. What's your point?
Don't fuck with the Culture.
0

#128 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 24 December 2009 - 08:39 PM

View PostYellow, on 24 December 2009 - 10:09 AM, said:

View PostQuickTidal, on 24 December 2009 - 12:26 AM, said:

I wonder if a lot of folk like this flick or something. :p


A lot of people liked Titanic as well. What's your point?



ummm, that 300 million dollars means alot of folk worldwide went to see it...so people must like it....


Where did I lose ya? :p
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#129 User is offline   cauthon 

  • Geek in progress
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 603
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Here
  • Interests:photography, fantasy
  • .6180339887

Posted 25 December 2009 - 11:02 AM

I am still flabbergasted at the criticism that the story would be bad. As has been pointed out, it's simple, but so are the Alien stories, so is Terminator (OK, ignore anything T3 onwards), and dozens of others. I think people here might have a problem with the storyline because they are used to deep stories, with numerous layers to it. But the truth is, the characters in Avatar are pretty well developed. They do not spend a lot of time in small details, but it is easy to see how the characters develop their affection or disgust of the natives and their world.

FYI, you might also want to check out these reviews:

http://whatever.scal.../avatar-review/

and

http://thearmchaircr.../12/avatar.html
0

#130 User is offline   lobo the wolfman 

  • Wide Eyed Stupid
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 450
  • Joined: 20-July 07
  • Location:Australia - land of the deadly drop-bears
  • Interests:Beer, books and heavy metal.

Posted 26 December 2009 - 07:14 AM

Watched this the other day and l really enjoyed it. The landscape to Pandora was incredible to look at and while the story is simple, as Tatterdemalion and others have said, it was still engrossing enough to keep you entertained.

Sad that l can never watch it in 3D, only have one working eye :p , l still consider it to be one of if not the best movie this year.
In a world gone mad, we will not spank the monkey, but the monkey will spank us.
0

#131 User is offline   Sir Thursday 

  • House Knight
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 1,819
  • Joined: 14-July 05
  • Location:Enfield, UK

Posted 28 December 2009 - 11:28 PM

View Postcauthon, on 25 December 2009 - 11:02 AM, said:

I am still flabbergasted at the criticism that the story would be bad. As has been pointed out, it's simple, but so are the Alien stories, so is Terminator (OK, ignore anything T3 onwards), and dozens of others. I think people here might have a problem with the storyline because they are used to deep stories, with numerous layers to it. But the truth is, the characters in Avatar are pretty well developed. They do not spend a lot of time in small details, but it is easy to see how the characters develop their affection or disgust of the natives and their world.

FYI, you might also want to check out these reviews:

http://whatever.scal.../avatar-review/

and

http://thearmchaircr.../12/avatar.html


The reason that the story has been criticised (or at least, why I felt the story was weak) was not that the story was simple (though it was) but that it was predictable. I had managed to avoid reading anything about the film before I went to see it, but after half an hour I could have told you pretty much exactly how the rest of the story was going to pan out. The simplicity is not the problem, the fact that the story has been told too many times before is (it doesn't help that this particular type of story is an obvious one to spot, and doesn't have many ways it can go differently).

Sir Thursday
Don't look now, but I think there's something weird attached to the bottom of my posts.
1

#132 User is offline   Tarcanus 

  • Lord of the Tarcans
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 500
  • Joined: 28-November 07
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 29 December 2009 - 08:49 PM

Did NO ONE ELSE notice that the dominant indigenous species (Na'vi) had only 4 limbs, while every other animal on the planet looked to have 6? Does this not strike anyone else as odd? Shouldn't the Na'vi have had 6 limbs, too?
0

#133 User is offline   Obdigore 

  • ThunderBear
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 6,165
  • Joined: 22-June 06

Posted 29 December 2009 - 08:56 PM

They had their Hair-things (which was wierd) and their giant blue penises, but all the giant blue penises were used by Watchmen, so they just wore lioncloths.
Monster Hunter World Iceborne: It's like hunting monsters, but on crack, but the monsters are also on crack.
1

#134 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 29 December 2009 - 09:14 PM

View PostTarcanus, on 29 December 2009 - 08:49 PM, said:

Did NO ONE ELSE notice that the dominant indigenous species (Na'vi) had only 4 limbs, while every other animal on the planet looked to have 6? Does this not strike anyone else as odd? Shouldn't the Na'vi have had 6 limbs, too?



Um....on earth MOST other species have 4, or 6, or more legs.....while humans, the dominant species have two (and two arms that likely evolved from other legs waaaaay back in the day)....so pretty much the same thing. The amount of legs or arms a species has is not related at all to the OTHER species on the planet, but rather said species' location, environment and lifestyle. The Na'vi seem to have evolved to live on two legs, just as we have. Not that difficult to believe.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#135 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 29 December 2009 - 09:20 PM

Oh, and this flick took 20 million yesterday, bringing the 11 day total worldwide to somewhere near 650 million. At this rate James Cameron may be well on his way to having the worlds two biggest grossing films of all time (the top spot holder is Titanic at 1.8 billion) if Avatar beats LOTR: ROTK (likely) and the Dark Knight (less likely). At any rate, over half a billion dollars is a staggering amount for 11 days in release. Whatever you're opinion of the flick is, it's doing swift business.
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#136 User is offline   dktorode 

  • Luck is my middle name, Mind you, my first name is Bad."
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 2,188
  • Joined: 03-September 05

Posted 29 December 2009 - 09:36 PM

Also ...4 eyes on everything not Na'vi.
Meh...if you want to nitpic then you could say that it would be extrememly unlikly that if we do find life on another planet, that they would be humanoid in shape and are pretty much the blueman group.
:D
...┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...

Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?
0

#137 User is online   QuickTidal 

  • Lord of the Kicks
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 22,131
  • Joined: 05-November 05
  • Location:Victoria Peak
  • Interests:DoubleStamping. Movies. Reading.

Posted 30 December 2009 - 03:56 AM

View Postdktorode, on 29 December 2009 - 09:36 PM, said:


Meh...if you want to nitpic then you could say that it would be extrememly unlikly that if we do find life on another planet, that they would be humanoid in shape and are pretty much the blueman group.
:p


A very good point. :D
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora

"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
0

#138 User is offline   Tarcanus 

  • Lord of the Tarcans
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 500
  • Joined: 28-November 07
  • Location:Pennsylvania

Posted 30 December 2009 - 02:00 PM

I agree it's nitpicking, but I found it odd that only the Na'vi had 4 limbs and we saw no other animals with 4. Didn't seem like a normal distribution of a species.
0

#139 User is offline   Traveller 

  • exile
  • Group: Malazan Artist
  • Posts: 4,862
  • Joined: 04-January 08
  • Location:GSV Nothing To See Here

Posted 30 December 2009 - 05:08 PM

Just saw it.

I liked it, despite the criticism. They really might as well have had the machines logging instead of mining (i know I know rich minerals etc); and with such a blatantly bloodthirsty army it seemed unlikely that any diplomacy would have been attempted in the first place, but it was nicely done. I liked the little similarities to Aliens, with the drop-ship start (somebody wake up Hicks!) and Ripley Sigourney getting out of a chamber when they arrived. All the hardware was evolved from Aliens too - not a bad thing imo!

Best watched on a screen the size of a house :D

This post has been edited by Traveller: 30 December 2009 - 05:12 PM

So that's the story. And what was the real lesson? Don't leave things in the fridge.
0

#140 User is offline   dktorode 

  • Luck is my middle name, Mind you, my first name is Bad."
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 2,188
  • Joined: 03-September 05

Posted 31 December 2009 - 09:07 AM

View PostTraveller, on 30 December 2009 - 05:08 PM, said:

I liked the little similarities to Aliens, with the drop-ship start (somebody wake up Hicks!) and Ripley Sigourney getting out of a chamber when they arrived. All the hardware was evolved from Aliens too - not a bad thing imo!


There is actually speculation that this movie takes place in the same "world/universe" as Aliens.
...┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐...

Why dont they make the whole plane out of that black box stuff?
0

Share this topic:


  • 12 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users