[Eloth]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 10:11 PM, said:

eloth, what are you on about? the three of them didnt remove their votes.

Edit: the f in f5 stands for fuck i think.

posts 1021 and 1032

[Rashan]

Well This is boring.

I see no other option at this time.


VOTE EMURLAHN

[Rashan]

And now the 5 hour wait for a mod to show up and end the day.

[Galayn Lord]

@ Eloth, thats two not 3 and Galain removed and then revoted in the same post, so I don't get the point you are trying to make, weve already talked about Tellans waffling.

[Eloth]

Silanah, on Jul 9 2009, 10:11 PM, said:

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 01:09 PM, said:

sure sure trying to set up tomorrow's lynch with an out of game arguement...nice...

Are you insane? If you are the same faction, it would be absolutely pointless for me to pursue you tomorrow and I already outlined this.

This is a very cunning trap post, I like it. I know my faction, you know your faction, I don't know Emulahn's faction, I don't know your faction. I hope Galain is not my faction since I have no choice at this point to try an break your voting block. You guys can't let Silanah play the equal oppurtunity faction removal person, Silanah has a faction and is going to of course try and protect it. To think that she may help you tomorrow or as she says NOT pursue you tomorrow is insane.

[Silanah]

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 01:21 PM, said:

Silanah, on Jul 9 2009, 10:11 PM, said:

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 01:09 PM, said:

sure sure trying to set up tomorrow's lynch with an out of game arguement...nice...

Are you insane? If you are the same faction, it would be absolutely pointless for me to pursue you tomorrow and I already outlined this.

This is a very cunning trap post, I like it. I know my faction, you know your faction, I don't know Emulahn's faction, I don't know your faction. I hope Galain is not my faction since I have no choice at this point to try an break your voting block. You guys can't let Silanah play the equal oppurtunity faction removal person, Silanah has a faction and is going to of course try and protect it. To think that she may help you tomorrow or as she says NOT pursue you tomorrow is insane.

Oh you like it, huh? Of course I'm trying to win, just like you. But do you really think the 'smart' way to win would be to just come out and push for another member of the same faction that just got lynched?

Anyway, I saw Tapper online, maybe he'll come post the results of the lynch.

edit: Or HD, he's on, too.

This post has been edited by Silanah: 09 July 2009 - 08:24 PM

[Eloth]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 10:21 PM, said:

@ Eloth, thats two not 3 and Galain removed and then revoted in the same post, so I don't get the point you are trying to make, weve already talked about Tellans waffling.

I never said three, don't put words in my mouth. My position is Silanah is leading the voting block, the other two got scared when I pointed this out and removed votes. Yep Galain put his back on*, but look at the context he did so with a "reason this time" as he says. So he didn't have a reason before he was just following Silanah or Tellan.

EDIT: *(put his back on in the same post) - should read.

This post has been edited by Eloth: 09 July 2009 - 08:25 PM

[Eloth]

x-post flurry...anyways I doubt it...mod coverage has been "patchy" at best.

[Galayn Lord]

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 08:45 PM, said:

Hehe...it doesn't really mean anything if you take the votes off for a few hours...then amazingly convince yourself to put them back on...so obvious those three, Tellan, Galain and Silanah....

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 09:04 PM, said:

Defense of what? Me being wierd? Defense against the Dark Arts? Those three are trying to establish a voting block to end the game;. They took their votes off for a few hours then found a convienent reason to put them back on. Nobody seems to believe it was Silanah and maybe they are right, but you have to knock out one of the three.

If two people die tonight, they have 3 of the 4 votes needed to lynch tomorrow with SEVEN people left.

(Is that non-wierd enough for you?)

Well what else is anyone supposed to think when you say the above?

[Eloth]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 09:30 PM, said:

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 08:45 PM, said:

Hehe...it doesn't really mean anything if you take the votes off for a few hours...then amazingly convince yourself to put them back on...so obvious those three, Tellan, Galain and Silanah....

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 09:04 PM, said:

Defense of what? Me being wierd? Defense against the Dark Arts? Those three are trying to establish a voting block to end the game;. They took their votes off for a few hours then found a convienent reason to put them back on. Nobody seems to believe it was Silanah and maybe they are right, but you have to knock out one of the three.

If two people die tonight, they have 3 of the 4 votes needed to lynch tomorrow with SEVEN people left.

(Is that non-wierd enough for you?)

Well what else is anyone supposed to think when you say the above?

I think you haven't read the thread....or you'd have known what and who I was talking about. Got a kill power and can't be bothered?

[Rashan]

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 04:24 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 10:21 PM, said:

@ Eloth, thats two not 3 and Galain removed and then revoted in the same post, so I don't get the point you are trying to make, weve already talked about Tellans waffling.

I never said three, don't put words in my mouth. My position is Silanah is leading the voting block, the other two got scared when I pointed this out and removed votes. Yep Galain put his back on*, but look at the context he did so with a "reason this time" as he says. So he didn't have a reason before he was just following Silanah or Tellan.

EDIT: *(put his back on in the same post) - should read.

Ok so let me get this straight. In a merc game were people only know their leader. You have managed to narrow a possible leader down to 3 players. Any one of whom could be a leader. Here is another scenario that you have left out. One of them could be just a normal player and the other two could be paired. The paired can talk off thread at all times so they come up with a plan to frame someone else by making people think that the third person is a leader. I am not saying that is what happened I am just saying that you have to consider all of the WIFOM options. Neither one is actually far fetched. We have all seen stranger things happen in games. As we get down to the nitty gritty the paired players become more and more important.

[HoosierDaddy]

That looks like a lynch on Emurlahn. You guys might have to sit tight for a while, I have no idea when Sixty or Ment is going to be back, and there is no prepared scene otherwise I'd give it to you.

Hang tight.

-HD, wannabe Path-Shaper

[Galayn Lord]

So I catch you out being untruthful, but Im the bad guy? Grow up Eloth. You said something then later denied it and got caught out, have the balls to accept you made a mistake.

[Eloth]

Rashan, on Jul 9 2009, 09:36 PM, said:

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 04:24 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 10:21 PM, said:

@ Eloth, thats two not 3 and Galain removed and then revoted in the same post, so I don't get the point you are trying to make, weve already talked about Tellans waffling.

I never said three, don't put words in my mouth. My position is Silanah is leading the voting block, the other two got scared when I pointed this out and removed votes. Yep Galain put his back on*, but look at the context he did so with a "reason this time" as he says. So he didn't have a reason before he was just following Silanah or Tellan.

EDIT: *(put his back on in the same post) - should read.

Ok so let me get this straight. In a merc game were people only know their leader. You have managed to narrow a possible leader down to 3 players. Any one of whom could be a leader. Here is another scenario that you have left out. One of them could be just a normal player and the other two could be paired. The paired can talk off thread at all times so they come up with a plan to frame someone else by making people think that the third person is a leader. I am not saying that is what happened I am just saying that you have to consider all of the WIFOM options. Neither one is actually far fetched. We have all seen stranger things happen in games. As we get down to the nitty gritty the paired players become more and more important.

Leader of a VOTING BLOCK, how hard is it to understand. It doesn't matter if one is a faction leader if they control enough votes to end the game tomorrow...it's still over. How fucking hard is it to look at the numbers?

[Silanah]

I just want to point out that I laughed reading about "balls" and "hang tight" in adjacent posts.

[Eloth]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 09:38 PM, said:

So I catch you out being untruthful, but Im the bad guy? Grow up Eloth. You said something then later denied it and got caught out, have the balls to accept you made a mistake.

You are trying to cover up having no clue what's going on by putting the blame on me? I never said all three removed their vote....why would they? They are a voting block, two of them did remove their votes to try and distance and it worked. I had to put down the post #'s for you as you had no fricken clue it was Galain and Tellan.

[Galayn Lord]

So Eloths gone from being confused and needing help to knowing more than anyone? I read the thread same as you, Im right you implied the three of them removed their votes for a couple of hours. They didn't...one person did - Tellan, and like I said loads have already commented on his toing and froing. I asked you to explain how you claimed it was 3 of them...like you said YOU gave me the post numbers, you didn't say that wasnt what you meant you gave me the post numbers, post numbers that proved you were wrong, so go ahead rage at me all you like. Im right about what you said and you know it.

[Eloth]

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 09:48 PM, said:

So Eloths gone from being confused and needing help to knowing more than anyone? I read the thread same as you, Im right you implied the three of them removed their votes for a couple of hours. They didn't...one person did - Tellan, and like I said loads have already commented on his toing and froing. I asked you to explain how you claimed it was 3 of them...like you said YOU gave me the post numbers, you didn't say that wasnt what you meant you gave me the post numbers, post numbers that proved you were wrong, so go ahead rage at me all you like. Im right about what you said and you know it.

Yes of course. People can read and see clearly the course of events. Some of them, unlike you can comprehend when they read as well. Here's a clue, Galain voted early for no good reason right along with Silanah, he admits it when he removes and votes again for a further silly reason. That is a simple illusion, in your mind he is now nothing to fear and he reaffirms his stance with another bullshit reason. That isn't suspicious to you? Do you need pictographs? Let me speak your language. Unga urg bunga urg rawr caveman make fiyah! If two people die tonight and there is only 7 people left. With easily 3 controlling votes it doesn't matter if my leader or your leader is left alive, he will get lynched eventually, it only takes one mistake tomorrow and they jump on...the game is over. ANY leader with 3 minions left HAS won the fucking GAME!!!!

So stop being a douche and fucking think about the game and yes I do know more than you do, it's always been quite clear.

[Rashan]

Eloth, on Jul 9 2009, 05:04 PM, said:

Galayn Lord, on Jul 9 2009, 09:48 PM, said:

So Eloths gone from being confused and needing help to knowing more than anyone? I read the thread same as you, Im right you implied the three of them removed their votes for a couple of hours. They didn't...one person did - Tellan, and like I said loads have already commented on his toing and froing. I asked you to explain how you claimed it was 3 of them...like you said YOU gave me the post numbers, you didn't say that wasnt what you meant you gave me the post numbers, post numbers that proved you were wrong, so go ahead rage at me all you like. Im right about what you said and you know it.

Yes of course. People can read and see clearly the course of events. Some of them, unlike you can comprehend when they read as well. Here's a clue, Galain voted early for no good reason right along with Silanah, he admits it when he removes and votes again for a further silly reason. That is a simple illusion, in your mind he is now nothing to fear and he reaffirms his stance with another bullshit reason. That isn't suspicious to you? Do you need pictographs? Let me speak your language. Unga urg bunga urg rawr caveman make fiyah! If two people die tonight and there is only 7 people left. With easily 3 controlling votes it doesn't matter if my leader or your leader is left alive, he will get lynched eventually, it only takes one mistake tomorrow and they jump on...the game is over. ANY leader with 3 minions left HAS won the fucking GAME!!!!

So stop being a douche and fucking think about the game and yes I do know more than you do, it's always been quite clear.

So what would you suggest we do about it now. Are you trying to tell your team killer to take out one of the three. Cause it looks that way to me. You do know that if that happens it will most likely come back at you. Or are you trying to say that those three have the game already wrapped up and we should all just quit now. Or are you trying to say that tomorrow is D day.
You pointed out something. Good for you. People ignored you. Hmm why would they do that. Perhaps if Two of the three are leaders the other people voting were just following along. Now wouldn't that be funny. Right now it looks to me like Emurlahn was your leader and your flipping out as he was lynched.

[Galayn Lord]

Eloth, what is your problem. I can undertsand fully what you are saying about leader + followers, but you are now changing the goal posts - that isnt what this disagreement is about and you know it. You said/distinctly implied (as per previously quoted posts) that the 3 of them removed their votes. I asked where. You didn't say that you hadnt meant to imply that. You confirmed it by directing me to posts. I explained that you were incorrect.

Then AGAIN instead of saying thats not what you meant you staretd to have a go at me. I challenged you and now youve gone off the deep end. Stick to the point and explain where I am wrong or admit that Im right or shut up, but dont insult me/my intelligence. Besides anything else its against the rules, and I suspect, bad for your blood pressure.