Malazan Empire: Who is the Tyrant that everyone fears? - Malazan Empire

Jump to content

  • 8 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Who is the Tyrant that everyone fears? speculation/spoilers inside (dont read unless you are done with TTH)

#121 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM

View PostH.D., on 07 October 2010 - 08:52 AM, said:

View PostRoldom, on 06 October 2010 - 06:40 PM, said:

just reading GoTM and saw this conv between mammot and crokus

'Ah.' Mammot glanced at his desk, raising an eyebrow at Moby, who had opened an inkwell and was drinking from it. 'The history of Darujhistan,' he said. 'I am just beginning the fifth volume, which opens with the reign of Ektalm, second to last of the Tyrant Kings.'
Crokus blinked. 'Who?'
Smiling, Marnmot sipped his tea. 'Usurper of Letastte and succeeded by his daughter, Sandenay, who brought on the Rising Time and with it the end of the age of tyrants.'

not much info but maybe gives us the tyrants name, also has the tyrant defintly been called a he and not a she?


This points to the lineage of Tyrant Kings/Queens. Note the words, "end of the age of tyrants," and not "end of the age of the Tyrant." We have other proof for the lineage of the Tyrant Kings outside of this, including coinage if I remember correctly. If I had to guess, this is simply a line of delineation, and does not point towards what empowered the original and important Tyrant or who could/would possibly be the new Tyrant.


This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position? The Tyrant Kings, plural would suggest that a lot of powerful people once ruled Darujhistan, one after the other until their was none left. The return may be either a descendant of one of these tyrant kings or just the return of this position within Darujhistan. Imagine it was Kruppe. He is powerful enough to combat the Cabal imo. The only reason we don't think this is because of his friendship with his comrades and his good nature.

I may have rambled a little but Mammot talking to Crokus does seem a good indication of what was and what is to come. We always get snippets from SE and ICE of what is to come.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#122 User is offline   D'iversify 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:

This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position?
It is a card in local variants of the Deck, so it's possible that it could the Unaligned equivalent of an unoccupied Hold.
I am the Onyx Wizards
0

#123 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:23 PM

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:

This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position?
It is a card in local variants of the Deck, so it's possible that it could the Unaligned equivalent of an unoccupied Hold.


well can you attribute that to what Mammot was talking about?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#124 User is offline   D'iversify 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:25 PM

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 12:23 PM, said:

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:

This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position?
It is a card in local variants of the Deck, so it's possible that it could the Unaligned equivalent of an unoccupied Hold.


well can you attribute that to what Mammot was talking about?
Not sure admittedly, but thought I might as well throw the idea out there.
I am the Onyx Wizards
0

#125 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 07 October 2010 - 12:56 PM

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:25 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 12:23 PM, said:

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:

This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position?
It is a card in local variants of the Deck, so it's possible that it could the Unaligned equivalent of an unoccupied Hold.


well can you attribute that to what Mammot was talking about?
Not sure admittedly, but thought I might as well throw the idea out there.


cool no worries, it's always great to have new theories and insights into things, i like your idea, although the card should already exist for this to have happened before..
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#126 User is offline   D'iversify 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 07-October 10

Posted 07 October 2010 - 06:05 PM

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 12:56 PM, said:

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:25 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 12:23 PM, said:

View PostD, on 07 October 2010 - 12:18 PM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 07 October 2010 - 09:37 AM, said:

This is a good catch, the fact that Darujhistan had an age of Tyrants at all is cool as it was built after Raest wasn't it. This does hint at the return of the Tyrant. Everyone thinks it is one person they are talking about but what if it is a position?
It is a card in local variants of the Deck, so it's possible that it could the Unaligned equivalent of an unoccupied Hold.


well can you attribute that to what Mammot was talking about?
Not sure admittedly, but thought I might as well throw the idea out there.


cool no worries, it's always great to have new theories and insights into things, i like your idea, although the card should already exist for this to have happened before..
I can't recall where or who it was in TtH, but there's a Deck of Dragons Talent native to Darujhistan who uses two non-canon cards, The Tyrant and The City, as part of her set, and they prove important in the divination she makes. So perhaps the Tyrant is not quite a Hold, but rather a local annex of power, with Holdlike qualities, with great influence over the region.
I am the Onyx Wizards
0

#127 User is offline   The Seguleh 46th 

  • High Fist
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 362
  • Joined: 22-March 10

Posted 07 October 2010 - 11:56 PM

View PostH.D., on 07 October 2010 - 08:52 AM, said:

View PostRoldom, on 06 October 2010 - 06:40 PM, said:

just reading GoTM and saw this conv between mammot and crokus

'Ah.' Mammot glanced at his desk, raising an eyebrow at Moby, who had opened an inkwell and was drinking from it. 'The history of Darujhistan,' he said. 'I am just beginning the fifth volume, which opens with the reign of Ektalm, second to last of the Tyrant Kings.'
Crokus blinked. 'Who?'
Smiling, Marnmot sipped his tea. 'Usurper of Letastte and succeeded by his daughter, Sandenay, who brought on the Rising Time and with it the end of the age of tyrants.'

not much info but maybe gives us the tyrants name, also has the tyrant defintly been called a he and not a she?


This points to the lineage of Tyrant Kings/Queens. Note the words, "end of the age of tyrants," and not "end of the age of the Tyrant." We have other proof for the lineage of the Tyrant Kings outside of this, including coinage if I remember correctly. If I had to guess, this is simply a line of delineation, and does not point towards what empowered the original and important Tyrant or who could/would possibly be the new Tyrant.


Beat me to it H.D! Basically everything you said, ditto!
0

#128 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 08 October 2010 - 08:03 AM

View PostThe Seguleh 46th, on 07 October 2010 - 11:56 PM, said:

View PostH.D., on 07 October 2010 - 08:52 AM, said:

View PostRoldom, on 06 October 2010 - 06:40 PM, said:

just reading GoTM and saw this conv between mammot and crokus

'Ah.' Mammot glanced at his desk, raising an eyebrow at Moby, who had opened an inkwell and was drinking from it. 'The history of Darujhistan,' he said. 'I am just beginning the fifth volume, which opens with the reign of Ektalm, second to last of the Tyrant Kings.'
Crokus blinked. 'Who?'
Smiling, Marnmot sipped his tea. 'Usurper of Letastte and succeeded by his daughter, Sandenay, who brought on the Rising Time and with it the end of the age of tyrants.'

not much info but maybe gives us the tyrants name, also has the tyrant defintly been called a he and not a she?


This points to the lineage of Tyrant Kings/Queens. Note the words, "end of the age of tyrants," and not "end of the age of the Tyrant." We have other proof for the lineage of the Tyrant Kings outside of this, including coinage if I remember correctly. If I had to guess, this is simply a line of delineation, and does not point towards what empowered the original and important Tyrant or who could/would possibly be the new Tyrant.


Beat me to it H.D! Basically everything you said, ditto!


In "the age of Tyrants" there would only ever be one Tyrant ruling at a time. There would not be two or three Tyrants.. so the age of Tyrants coming to an end would refer to many tyrants that have ruled in the past.

If this age of tyrants would come again, it would only be one Tyrant returning, maybe another after him/her/it. So it is plausable that Mammot's information is a clue to what is to come.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#129 User is offline   excession 

  • Recruit
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 15-October 10

Posted 18 October 2010 - 07:56 AM

... Kallor. Who else? He's almost always got some throne or another under his bony behind. And he's a swordsman of NOTE! Good enough, possibly, to lead the Seguleh.
Also, elsewhere people have theorised that the Seguleh have something to do with Sechul Lath, an Elder God who wasn't concerned with Kallor's Empire (the one now in the Imperial Warren), and possibly willing to grant Kallor patronage... after all, he's the God of Misfortune, and it would be very unfortunate for Darujistan to be ruled by Kallor!
0

#130 User is offline   Mcflury 

  • First Sword
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 561
  • Joined: 15-September 07
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Reading, writing, partying, playing PC-games (mainly MMO's) and many more.

Posted 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM

View Postexcession, on 18 October 2010 - 07:56 AM, said:

Good enough, possibly, to lead the Seguleh.

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...

I'm not denying Kallor is a great swordsman. I'm just saying... don't underestimate the Seguleh...
"There is no struggle too vast no odds too overwhelming for even should we fail, should we fall, we will know that we have lived" - Anomander Rake
(From Toll the Hounds by Steven Erikson)
0

#131 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 18 October 2010 - 08:59 AM

View PostMcflury, on 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

View Postexcession, on 18 October 2010 - 07:56 AM, said:

Good enough, possibly, to lead the Seguleh.

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...

I'm not denying Kallor is a great swordsman. I'm just saying... don't underestimate the Seguleh...


I think a few people could beat Kallor but he is cursed to live forever by the Elder Gods isn't he?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#132 User is offline   HoosierDaddy 

  • Believer
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,037
  • Joined: 30-June 08
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Interests:Football

Posted 18 October 2010 - 09:05 AM

View PostTattersail, on 18 October 2010 - 08:59 AM, said:

View PostMcflury, on 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

View Postexcession, on 18 October 2010 - 07:56 AM, said:

Good enough, possibly, to lead the Seguleh.

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...

I'm not denying Kallor is a great swordsman. I'm just saying... don't underestimate the Seguleh...


I think a few people could beat Kallor but he is cursed to live forever by the Elder Gods isn't he?


This is one of the more random aside arguments in the series. Read RotCG and you'll realize that the fight mentioned is not as it seems.

Kallor is not the Tyrant. He was looking for a throne in Darujhistan. He's cursed to not ascend. The power of the Tyrant almost necessitates ascension in usage.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
0

#133 User is offline   Jade-Green Pig-Hog Swine-Beast 

  • Knight Seneschal
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 1,551
  • Joined: 31-August 10
  • Location:London, UK
  • Interests:Fencing, ninpo, didjeridu, good books, good films and irn-bru.
  • Pre-dinner mayonnaise -- it's good for you!

Posted 18 October 2010 - 09:11 AM

View PostMcflury, on 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...


If Whiskeyjack had actually stood a chance, I think Spinnock would have cut Kallor to little pieces. As it is, Spinnock knew that he never had a chance against Kallor, which would tell me that Whiskeyjack's chances were next to nothing -- he may have been a great soldier and commander but when it comes to swordsmanship, I don't know that he was any better than any other regular soldier.

This post has been edited by Green Pig: 18 October 2010 - 09:12 AM

The love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain.

"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." Iain Banks
0

#134 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 18 October 2010 - 09:35 AM

View PostH.D., on 18 October 2010 - 09:05 AM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 18 October 2010 - 08:59 AM, said:

View PostMcflury, on 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

View Postexcession, on 18 October 2010 - 07:56 AM, said:

Good enough, possibly, to lead the Seguleh.

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...

I'm not denying Kallor is a great swordsman. I'm just saying... don't underestimate the Seguleh...


I think a few people could beat Kallor but he is cursed to live forever by the Elder Gods isn't he?


This is one of the more random aside arguments in the series. Read RotCG and you'll realize that the fight mentioned is not as it seems.

Kallor is not the Tyrant. He was looking for a throne in Darujhistan. He's cursed to not ascend. The power of the Tyrant almost necessitates ascension in usage.


I don't think for one minute Kallor is the Tyrant. Imo the Tyrant has to have magical skills as well as good swordsman skills, I don't think we know who the Tyrant is yet to be honest, I don't think we have seen him in the series so far

View PostGreen Pig, on 18 October 2010 - 09:11 AM, said:

View PostMcflury, on 18 October 2010 - 08:46 AM, said:

Didn't Whiskeyjack almost beat him though? I mean, if it wasn't for that bad leg, as I read that scene, I really thought Whiskeyjack stood a big chance...


If Whiskeyjack had actually stood a chance, I think Spinnock would have cut Kallor to little pieces. As it is, Spinnock knew that he never had a chance against Kallor, which would tell me that Whiskeyjack's chances were next to nothing -- he may have been a great soldier and commander but when it comes to swordsmanship, I don't know that he was any better than any other regular soldier.


you do know this, you do, because it states in one of the books, and I am sure it is early on so I don't think I have to spoiler it but I will just in case,
Spoiler

Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#135 User is offline   HoosierDaddy 

  • Believer
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,037
  • Joined: 30-June 08
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Interests:Football

Posted 18 October 2010 - 09:48 AM

@Tattersail:

ROTCG Spoilers:

Spoiler

Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
0

#136 User is offline   Jade-Green Pig-Hog Swine-Beast 

  • Knight Seneschal
  • Group: Team Quick Ben
  • Posts: 1,551
  • Joined: 31-August 10
  • Location:London, UK
  • Interests:Fencing, ninpo, didjeridu, good books, good films and irn-bru.
  • Pre-dinner mayonnaise -- it's good for you!

Posted 18 October 2010 - 09:48 AM

Hmm...you have me there. An easy thing to overlook -- perhaps I'm wrong then. We never really saw Whiskeyjack fight though, at least not one on one, so I was probably making assumptions based on who else we've seen fight (with Kallor or someone his equal) where there skill seems so awesomely...awesome and we never got to see WJ fight like that.
The love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain.

"Perhaps we think up our own destinies and so, in a sense, deserve whatever happens to us, for not having had the wit to imagine something better." Iain Banks
0

#137 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 18 October 2010 - 10:12 AM

View PostH.D., on 18 October 2010 - 09:48 AM, said:

@Tattersail:

ROTCG Spoilers:

Spoiler



Spoiler
in terms of Kallor and the curse. This again is not a spoiler because it came from early books, but some of this may contain spoilers
Spoiler

This post has been edited by Tattersail: 18 October 2010 - 10:12 AM

Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#138 User is offline   HoosierDaddy 

  • Believer
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 8,037
  • Joined: 30-June 08
  • Location:Indianapolis
  • Interests:Football

Posted 18 October 2010 - 10:20 AM

View PostTattersail, on 18 October 2010 - 10:12 AM, said:

View PostH.D., on 18 October 2010 - 09:48 AM, said:

@Tattersail:

ROTCG Spoilers:

Spoiler



Spoiler
in terms of Kallor and the curse. This again is not a spoiler because it came from early books, but some of this may contain spoilers
Spoiler



Spoiler

This post has been edited by H.D.: 18 October 2010 - 10:21 AM

Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
0

#139 User is offline   Tattersail_ 

  • formerly Ganoes Paran
  • Group: High House Mafia
  • Posts: 13,263
  • Joined: 16-July 10
  • Location:Wirral
  • Interests:Mafia. Awesome Pictures. Awesome Videos. Did I mention Mafia?
    snapchat - rustyspoon84

Posted 18 October 2010 - 11:06 AM

View PostH.D., on 18 October 2010 - 10:20 AM, said:

View PostTattersail, on 18 October 2010 - 10:12 AM, said:

View PostH.D., on 18 October 2010 - 09:48 AM, said:

@Tattersail:

ROTCG Spoilers:

Spoiler



Spoiler
in terms of Kallor and the curse. This again is not a spoiler because it came from early books, but some of this may contain spoilers
Spoiler



Spoiler



Kallor has not already ruled Darujhistan in the past though has he? it is a return of the Tyrant isn't it?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
0

#140 User is offline   MTS 

  • Fourth Investiture
  • Group: Malaz Regular
  • Posts: 4,334
  • Joined: 02-April 07
  • Location:Terra Australis

Posted 18 October 2010 - 11:30 AM

It's a pretty safe bet that Kallor has not ruled Darujhistan, since there was a line of tyrannical kings, the last of whom I think we know as the Tyrant. Kallor's father was loooooooong dead before Darujhistan even existed. There has been mention of Kallor ruling more than one empire, but even if he was the first it would be unlikely, since he killed all of his wives and children to rule out any challengers to his throne.
Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad necem.

Si hoc adfixum in obice legere potes, et liberaliter educatus et nimis propinquus ades.
0

Share this topic:


  • 8 Pages +
  • « First
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users