I suspect everyone apart from Gamelon, I can understand his argument but I also understand Galain's argument about Liosan.
If Liosan is scum, I believe he's the DG, suggesting that Gamelon was fake revealing is understandable, but wouldn't it be to the advantage of the DG to suggest that Gamelon was lying:
a ) if he can swing the lynch on to Gamelon then he can remove a person who has revealed as Duncan, who is a threat to him, cause Gamelon's disinfect will reveal the DG, and I guess the DG doesn't want to take that risk.
b ) also maybe he was hoping that the reveal wasn't just to give info to innos but to protect his partner, in that case he had either me or eloth to choose from, as I've easily have played the worst so far, it was more likely me but how about try and push a serious argument and hope that Gamelon's partner reveal, then he knows who Duncan and Janice are for sure and all he got to do is try and infect a killer to allow for this situation he suggested in his argument.
Quote
I'd say WCS is that Game is one of two killers and he killed Duncan last night and is now a symp of the DG. The killers then agreed to then get his sister to reveal so they can kill her and infect/symp the other killer, thus joining the scum into one communicating all-powerful force with coordinated killing and infecting powers that will crush us all. It might not be likely, but it sure-as-fuck is scary and I don't think we can necessarily take Game's reveal as holy truth. After that monastery game, I'm especially suspicious of people who reveal and then disappear for long periods of time.
Maybe he is putting that as a message to the killers in that if they are infected go for Duncan or Janice and they can all win together.
Also the "I'm especially suspicious of people who reveal and then disappear for long periods of time", suggests that he would be suspicious of Gamelon and that Gamelon may be at the top of the list unless evidence comes to suggest he is Duncan, me revealing.
Liosan seems to be a tad fond of throwing people's name's out without suggesting which one he is more willing to go for.
Quote
I agree Meanas and Korlat need to start giving us content. Their posts are pretty much nil on content so far. If they don't start posting by later today, I will consider voting for one of them.
Maybe when he comes back he will carefully look at each one, or see who is most to get lynched and then put up an argument based on which one is closest to lycnhing has said, I mean in my view a good scum will let us do his work for him while subtly guides us along.
The quote below was made in post 1025, in it Liosan quoted Galain's vote on me.
Quote
This post jumped out to me. You can talk all you want about how you have no reservations about lynching Mockra, but from where I'm sitting, it looks like you're trying to railroad another noob to save Mockra's ass again. I guess only time will tell, but I remain suspicious.
Ok just cause Mockra was innocent doesn't mean Galain isn't, but he heavily suggested that Galain was symping mockra in quite a few other posts.
Quote
Okay, since Rashan is now fixin' to get hammered, I guess I'm going to
remove vote
as discussed earlier (making it harder for the DG to compel and all that). My vote is still on Mockra, though. In fact, I think there are, like, 3 unregistered votes on Mockra right now, just in case, I dunno, you guys wanna bag a definite scum, 'cause Mockra is scummy as shit.
Considering that Liosan ridiculed Mockra's idea of speed lynching to catch out compelled infected in a few posts like the one quoted below. Why add that little bit of removing his vote to show he wasn't compelled, we all argued that it was very unlikely that compel would have been used that day, also the above posts he says there was a chance of getting mockra lynched that day, could have that been an attempt to split the vote just as day times out?
Quote
Quote
(Mockra @ Jun 25 2009, 01:41 AM)
Well based on how the voting was going I suspected that there wouldn't be another viable lynch target for the day so I wanted to lynch before infected players could place a vote on their forced target. I know nobody else would have pushed the lynch but that is what I was hoping for as it would have gotten rid of 2 infected who would do the DG's bidding. Now the infected are either the 2 voting for me currently or are on the Rashan train and based on Kaschan not voting for anyone, it seems he might not be infected. I didn't really want to mention lynching when I placed my vote as I didn't want the infected to get their votes down in a flurry.
@Liosan, You think getting rid of 2 infected is only good for scum? I disagree but you can think what you like
Now Rashan is at L-1 so I suspect someone will hammer shortly and we will see if any infected have not placed their needed votes if the effect is in place. Right now the 2 people who I suspect are infected are the 2 voting for me and Sil as the DG.
Repeating your silly argument doesn't make it any less silly. In fact, it might make it more silly. You do realize the DG doesn't
have to compel, right? The chances of your plan working were so stupidly small, I don't even know why we're talking about it.
Vote Liosan
Edited to remove a silly emoticon
This post has been edited by Hood's Path: 28 June 2009 - 03:40 PM