Ruse, on Jun 11 2009, 06:54 PM, said:
You can't vote if you aren't here and I did vote for Fener, in fact I pushed my case day 2. I was gullible and did believe his reveal, but was hardly alone in that. Oh and I wanted to hammer Game today, but YOU said to wait and even removed your vote. I told you I wouldn't be on until later...you can't have forgotten that already can you? And now I have to sleep, whether it's convenient or not. Heresy I know, but this game has to come after petty trivialities like work and family (not all of us can access the internet in work you know).
Edit: Cross post - and this was @ Rashan
Danger - Contradiction alert!!!!
Day 2 after the Sil Lynch Fener and Ruse are talking, Ruse says, I didn't try to hurt you!
Ruse, on Jun 7 2009, 06:47 AM, said:
Fener, on Jun 7 2009, 10:28 AM, said:
what the hell?
There's a big difference between what's said on the first page of the game and further into it. I understand that I'm a good target and this is a merc game so there's no such thing as innocent, but can't you guys at least try to provide an argument that actually makes sense?
Look how things have developed, I mentioned Korlat yesterday and today as one of my favourite candidates for a lynch. Ruse went for me yesterday when I did that, and again today (meaning day 2 btw), not to mention Liosan.. Don't you guys feel some people were a bit too willing to jump on my train for no logical reason? This has not been a Fener acts like a power role and should be lynched, but rather a we must lynch Fener so let's find some sign of him being a power role.
And of course I'm bloody obsessed with getting the strong roles, it's the best way for my team to win killing the other leaders. That's the logical approach to this game, weakening the other factions as much as possible. I firmly believe Korlat is the best target and if you consider it, I have no better reason to want him dead than because I consider him a threat. If he's a threat to me then he's also a threat to everyone else not on his own team.
I think you need to do a reread or stop being disingenuous.
I did NOT go for you yesterday (game day 1) quote me where I did or did you think you could slip that in to attack me and no-one would notice - bad Fener! And for your information I don't give two hoots about Korlat. Come up with a case and I'll change my vote, but 'I have an instinct' isn't a case or a defence.
All I have done is reflect your own arguments back at you and waited for a defence. You said (to paraphrase) people often make the mistake of talking about their own character/role. My point was in what way was that different to what you were doing? And how were you so sure Sil wasn't in your faction unless you are some power role yourself?
(And you have never answered the question about the arrogant
I am ashamed I missed it or words to that effect.)
And why is there a big difference between what's on the first page and later on? I've been in games where players ahve been lynched precisely because of the first page.
Next!!!! I would vote for you...but, but....I just cant!!! SO, I will try and put the tag on Kess, for saying you might be "gasp!" the cult (which, yeah, Fener was in fact cult, oops!)
Ruse, on Jun 8 2009, 06:05 PM, said:
The meeting was longer and far more boring than anticipated, so I am behind with everything this evening.
Tell you what Fener, I would love to vote for you today if only for the fact you are such a cocksure pain, regrettably for me that's not a strong enough reason. My case on you yesterday
was weak, but it was as good as it could be with the information available and for me it was the best one on the table. Whilst, your case that I was recruited flies just as well as…well pigs do - no offence! OMGUS all bar the vote.
And if you must know I am willing to vote Kesso, if only for his argument that you would be a good recruit for the cult. I mean that makes no sense, it's even worse than your argument on me! You were a breath away from a lynch, the recruiter would be nuts to do that - and even if he were then to my mind it's the recruiter we want not some ineffectual (in terms of power) know all…no offence again
. Who would want to divert attention on to a 'suspected' recruit more than the recruiter?…After all he knows who he has turned.
@Liosan - I said yesterday that I would vote for Korlat if there was a case. Same thing today, in fact if you read my posts from earlier today (instead of relying on selective memory) you will see I raised him as a possible contender, and he remains my likely candidate for today, except for my concerns about Kessobahn as above.
BUT WAIT!!! THERES MORE!!!! FENER HAS 5 THATS RIGHT F-I-V-E votes and Kess has 2, 2 votes, Fener is L-3....Kess is L-6
Fener, on Jun 9 2009, 03:15 AM, said:
well then, I'd rather there's a valid candidate other than me, and considering the basis for lynching me, both Korlat and Kesso should be better choices.Remove votevote Kessobahn
and then
Ruse, on Jun 9 2009, 03:25 AM, said:
Here only briefly I'm afraid.
vote Kessobahn
for the reasons I gave before, and because the vote on Korlat seems to have stalled.
3 hours left in the day, and you Vote Kess, not Fener tough, not the one with more votes, that you say you "attacked"?
Thats enough for me
Vote Ruse