Aptorian
#41
Posted 30 May 2009 - 06:09 AM
I think Apt's posts are great, hope he stays on the forum!
#42
Posted 30 May 2009 - 08:20 AM
Aptorian, on May 29 2009, 10:15 PM, said:
Yeah, Poland with attack you with their armored horse cavalries and potato vodka fuelled conscripts.
guerilla warfare, assasinations and terrorism. we never give up!
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.
#43
Posted 30 May 2009 - 09:36 AM
Okay, just to explain since some people seem to have the impression I might be mad about the demotion.
As far as I know, nobody had a problem with my work as a moderator. The problem lied in that every time somebody got reprimanded or sent a PM for doing something annoying or in violation of the code of conduct the reply would almost certainly be a variation of "but why are people like dkt, Illy or Apt allowed to post naughty things or say bad words in capital letters then, without being sanctioned?". Now, whether somebody needs a stern talking to or a whack with the mod stick or not, that's up to the staffs own judgement. It's another thing when a moderator keeps being brought up as an example of a rule breaker.
I am who I am, I didn't really change my style when I became a moderator. I can't mention the amount of times I've been scolded by the other moderators for this or that picture. I guess I could have just stopped posting pictures all together and put some more restraint on myself in general, but that doesn't really sound that fun. We had our difference in the opinion of certain aspects of the forum style. So I've been demoted.
That doesn't mean I'm going to become mad and storm out. Or start making a fuss over things. I might be a bit more careful with the pictures, because now they could actually BAN ME
but I'm not going to change anything.
As far as I know, nobody had a problem with my work as a moderator. The problem lied in that every time somebody got reprimanded or sent a PM for doing something annoying or in violation of the code of conduct the reply would almost certainly be a variation of "but why are people like dkt, Illy or Apt allowed to post naughty things or say bad words in capital letters then, without being sanctioned?". Now, whether somebody needs a stern talking to or a whack with the mod stick or not, that's up to the staffs own judgement. It's another thing when a moderator keeps being brought up as an example of a rule breaker.
I am who I am, I didn't really change my style when I became a moderator. I can't mention the amount of times I've been scolded by the other moderators for this or that picture. I guess I could have just stopped posting pictures all together and put some more restraint on myself in general, but that doesn't really sound that fun. We had our difference in the opinion of certain aspects of the forum style. So I've been demoted.
That doesn't mean I'm going to become mad and storm out. Or start making a fuss over things. I might be a bit more careful with the pictures, because now they could actually BAN ME
#44
Posted 30 May 2009 - 11:12 AM
Its all gone tits up since we welcomed you into the Abyssmal Army innit?
#45
#46
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:08 PM
Well, if it makes you happy, I made a big wordy selfrighteous speech before I left that probably annoyed half of them in one way or another...
#47
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:12 PM
Copy Paste or it never happened.
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#48
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:17 PM
The wiki actually has a page on it about all the admins and mods which hadn't been updated for about 6 years until a couple days ago when I modernized it. And then 2 days after I write Apt's name in as mod, he gets demoted. Coincidence?!
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
#49
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:19 PM
Hetan wanted to paste it up in open forum but since a reflective Apt had said he wanted to clarify for the negative tone a couple of posts later she decided it would be unfair.
It was basically a criticism of me for hating all the members and calling us all old and set in our ways and asking for the forum to have referenda about stuff.
Had some good ideas in it though.
It was basically a criticism of me for hating all the members and calling us all old and set in our ways and asking for the forum to have referenda about stuff.
Had some good ideas in it though.
I AM A TWAT
#50
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:27 PM
Cougar, on May 30 2009, 10:19 AM, said:
Hetan wanted to paste it up in open forum but since a reflective Apt had said he wanted to clarify for the negative tone a couple of posts later she decided it would be unfair.
It was basically a criticism of me for hating all the members and calling us all old and set in our ways and asking for the forum to have referenda about stuff.
Had some good ideas in it though.
It was basically a criticism of me for hating all the members and calling us all old and set in our ways and asking for the forum to have referenda about stuff.
Had some good ideas in it though.
Referenda?! I can picture it now...
Results of "Should repeated lack of spoilering yield temporary bans?":
Yes - 3%
No - 5%
IADMATTIS - 92%
This post has been edited by D'rek: 30 May 2009 - 03:28 PM
#51
Posted 30 May 2009 - 03:38 PM
Should we reinstate rep?
Yes 12%
No 11%
Don't care but could be bothered voting??(WTF) 43%
Prefer LOLCats 21%
I Blame Brood 7%
Wolverine 6%
Chuck Norris 6%
Turn Out 5%
Yes 12%
No 11%
Don't care but could be bothered voting??(WTF) 43%
Prefer LOLCats 21%
I Blame Brood 7%
Wolverine 6%
Chuck Norris 6%
Turn Out 5%
This post has been edited by Cougar: 30 May 2009 - 03:39 PM
I AM A TWAT
#53
Posted 30 May 2009 - 04:40 PM
Cougar, on May 30 2009, 04:38 PM, said:
Should we reinstate rep?
Yes 12%
No 11%
Don't care but could be bothered voting??(WTF) 43%
Prefer LOLCats 21%
I Blame Brood 7%
Wolverine 6%
Chuck Norris 600%
Turn Out 5%
Yes 12%
No 11%
Don't care but could be bothered voting??(WTF) 43%
Prefer LOLCats 21%
I Blame Brood 7%
Wolverine 6%
Chuck Norris 600%
Turn Out 5%
Fixed
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#54
Posted 30 May 2009 - 04:55 PM
dont worry Apt,
I would still follow you to hell and back.
I would still follow you to hell and back.
You can't find me because I'm lost in the music
#55
Posted 30 May 2009 - 05:41 PM
D'rek, on May 30 2009, 12:17 PM, said:
The wiki actually has a page on it about all the admins and mods which hadn't been updated for about 6 years until a couple days ago when I modernized it. And then 2 days after I write Apt's name in as mod, he gets demoted. Coincidence?!
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
Well, it needs a bit more editing. I'm not the site owner (that used to be Rake), just an admin who's been here ages.
And so the First denied their Mother,
in their fury, and so were cast out,
doomed children of Mother Dark.
in their fury, and so were cast out,
doomed children of Mother Dark.
#56
Posted 30 May 2009 - 11:40 PM
Anomander, on May 30 2009, 12:41 PM, said:
D'rek, on May 30 2009, 12:17 PM, said:
The wiki actually has a page on it about all the admins and mods which hadn't been updated for about 6 years until a couple days ago when I modernized it. And then 2 days after I write Apt's name in as mod, he gets demoted. Coincidence?!
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
(Don't worry Apt, you'll still get a mention in the 'ex-leaders' section)
Well, it needs a bit more editing. I'm not the site owner (that used to be Rake), just an admin who's been here ages.
I don't think the original author distinguished between you and Rake. I wouldn't know about such godly matters beyond us mere ascendant scholards...
#57
Posted 31 May 2009 - 04:18 AM
Ive been on since 06 and never knew what was up with all the rake accounts... i guess thats pretty sad on my account...
You can't find me because I'm lost in the music
#58
Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:42 AM
Wasn't jenisand - wanderer in the sword, siteowner at some point? Or was it rake who did a namechange?
Quote
I would like to know if Steve have ever tasted anything like the quorl white milk, that knocked the bb's out.
A: Nope, but I gots me a good imagination.
A: Nope, but I gots me a good imagination.
#59
Posted 31 May 2009 - 10:27 AM
Sindriss, on May 31 2009, 10:42 AM, said:
Wasn't jenisand - wanderer in the sword, siteowner at some point? Or was it rake who did a namechange?
nah, he was just an admin and admins are petty and spitefull little people that should not be dignified by us talking about them
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil

Help






















