D'riss, on May 13 2009, 06:07 PM, said:
Telas, on May 13 2009, 03:03 PM, said:
D'riss, on May 13 2009, 06:00 PM, said:
You were 100% certain he was innocent?
That strikes me as very odd.
I mean, in mafia, I trust some people more than others, but unless someone is definetely CI, as in definitively proved, then I am never 100% sure they are innocent.
You really thought Rashan was probably scum? I never said he wasn't scum, I said I never thought he was. Not CI, but PI and a SYMP AT BEST.
If you really thought Rashan was scum, then you are a bad player and should be lynched for hindering my inno team.
If you are scum (hint: you are), then you are lying about Rashan being probable OVERT scum. And you should be lynched for being the bad guy.
Please explain?
I am a bad player for getting something wrong?
The majority of lynches hit innocents. That means the majority of times, the majority gets things wrong.
Oh, and since when have we lynched people for getting things wrong? That's just a massive waste of a lynch. If you think they're a bad player/hindering the team, you maybe don't listen to them, but you don't waste a lynch, surely? And you call me a bad player.
I would like to lynch D'riss or HP, because only scum could be utterly certain of Rashans innocence, and D'riss seems to be grasping at straws here, with his ideas about lynching people for being wrong.
Not sure which.
D'riss strikes me immediately as more scummy, but I could well be biased here, since i've been arguing with him.
HP strikes me as massively odd, why not say anything if you're sure he's innocent, and his explanations just don't make sense.