[Emurlahn]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:55 AM, said:

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 03:52 PM, said:

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

I could see that being the case.
But goddamn that would be too obvious....woulnt it?

yeah, I know, but Fener swtiching to Meanas's vote just now... maybe one is inexperienced? dunno

[Emurlahn]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:56 AM, said:

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 09:52 AM, said:

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

Now Now, unfounded accusations are unfounded. If you actually read the thread, Silanah started in at me today, after I posted a case about Ruse, not the other way around.

As for Fener, I have no idea what he is doing, but with the way Silanah is playing I can't fault him for questioning him.

and there's those nanobots trying to be sly again! this is as much gut instinct as persuasion by Ruse but

vote Meanas

[Silanah]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 09:52 AM, said:

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

Now Now, unfounded accusations are unfounded. If you actually read the thread, Silanah started in at me today, after I posted a case about Ruse, not the other way around.

As for Fener, I have no idea what he is doing, but with the way Silanah is playing I can't fault him for questioning him.

you mentioned me in your ramblings...so i have a roght to defend myself even if you are targeting someone else.

[Tennes]

Well, to be honest I dont really want to get involved in the pissing contest that's starting to develop. Does anyone have anything levelheaded to discuss?

[Emurlahn]

 Tennes, on May 14 2009, 11:01 AM, said:

Well, to be honest I dont really want to get involved in the pissing contest that's starting to develop. Does anyone have anything levelheaded to discuss?

Lio thinks he's been targeted because UB guessed huis alt and Si; was talkin about how Gam was being too nice before the pissing started

[Korvalain]

Good morning, lets get to work.

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

funny thing is...im not even angry

Coulda fooled me. The problem is, despite the fact that text is soulless, it can carry a certain level of emotion to the reader based on the words and punctuation used. You're coming across as a raving nut, loud aggressive and repulsive. Fener on the other hand, as I read him, seems more lucid and levelheaded. I'm not casting guilt on either of you right now, tho Emu's comment about a Meanas Fener link may hold water, I'm gonna go look into them when I finish looking at Gamelon, but raving and throwing a tantrum hurts your credibility. Right now Fener has more credibility with me because he's keeping his emotions in check.

crosspost

This post has been edited by Korvalain: 14 May 2009 - 03:03 PM

[Meanas]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

Actually Silanah, you attacked me 4 times while I was asleep, and I ignored them. You then posted this when I wasn't talking to you or attacking you in any way, which I then responded to.

I'm sorry that how you wanted the thread to go and how it actually went are different, but it happens.

[Silanah]

 Korvalain, on May 14 2009, 04:02 PM, said:

Good morning, lets get to work.

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

funny thing is...im not even angry

Coulda fooled me. The problem is, despite the fact that text is soulless, it can carry a certain level of emotion to the reader based on the words and punctuation used. You're coming across as a raving nut, loud aggressive and repulsive. Fener on the other hand, as I read him, seems more lucid and levelheaded. I'm not casting guilt on either of you right now, tho Emu's comment about a Meanas Fener link may hold water, I'm gonna go look into them when I finish looking at Gamelon, but raving and throwing a tantrum hurts your credibility. Right now Fener has more credibility with me because he's keeping his emotions in check.

crosspost

ignore my caps (for emphasis) and my swearing and you will ee i am level headed too

[Silanah]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 04:03 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

Actually Silanah, you attacked me 4 times while I was asleep, and I ignored them. You then posted this when I wasn't talking to you or attacking you in any way, which I then responded to.

I'm sorry that how you wanted the thread to go and how it actually went are different, but it happens.

attacked you while you sleep?
The only things i have ever said while you are not here is commenting on posts of your while catching up.
hardly "attack" stuff.

[Tennes]

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 05:02 PM, said:

 Tennes, on May 14 2009, 11:01 AM, said:

Well, to be honest I dont really want to get involved in the pissing contest that's starting to develop. Does anyone have anything levelheaded to discuss?

Lio thinks he's been targeted because UB guessed huis alt and Si; was talkin about how Gam was being too nice before the pissing started

I got that. Personally I think BB would hang back a little for the first few days. Even with the ability to pass the killer torch on (and the incredible paranoia that causes), getting killed early will be a big blow and with only two I dont see them sticking their necks out too early. In that sense people who hang back are valid enough suspects, but I suppose I'm also one of those, so yeah.

[Silanah]

ugh...watever im done arguing.. we are now arguing about arguing wich is pointless

[Emurlahn]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 11:05 AM, said:

 Korvalain, on May 14 2009, 04:02 PM, said:

Good morning, lets get to work.

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

funny thing is...im not even angry

Coulda fooled me. The problem is, despite the fact that text is soulless, it can carry a certain level of emotion to the reader based on the words and punctuation used. You're coming across as a raving nut, loud aggressive and repulsive. Fener on the other hand, as I read him, seems more lucid and levelheaded. I'm not casting guilt on either of you right now, tho Emu's comment about a Meanas Fener link may hold water, I'm gonna go look into them when I finish looking at Gamelon, but raving and throwing a tantrum hurts your credibility. Right now Fener has more credibility with me because he's keeping his emotions in check.

crosspost

ignore my caps (for emphasis) and my swearing and you will ee i am level headed too

lol thats like "ignore my raised voice and cane of fury and youll see Im not beatin up a hoe at all"

[Silanah]

well....i have to leave, lift is here.
Wont change my vote till some more people have a look and discuss gamelon. If anything gamelon needs some pressure.
But if it comes down to changing my vote to meanas...for the sake of my faith in mafia...ill put down a vote on him if needed. that goes for fener too.

cheers

[Silanah]

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 04:09 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 11:05 AM, said:

 Korvalain, on May 14 2009, 04:02 PM, said:

Good morning, lets get to work.

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

funny thing is...im not even angry

Coulda fooled me. The problem is, despite the fact that text is soulless, it can carry a certain level of emotion to the reader based on the words and punctuation used. You're coming across as a raving nut, loud aggressive and repulsive. Fener on the other hand, as I read him, seems more lucid and levelheaded. I'm not casting guilt on either of you right now, tho Emu's comment about a Meanas Fener link may hold water, I'm gonna go look into them when I finish looking at Gamelon, but raving and throwing a tantrum hurts your credibility. Right now Fener has more credibility with me because he's keeping his emotions in check.

crosspost

ignore my caps (for emphasis) and my swearing and you will ee i am level headed too

lol thats like "ignore my raised voice and cane of fury and youll see Im not beatin up a hoe at all"

zactly

[Emurlahn]

 Tennes, on May 14 2009, 11:08 AM, said:

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 05:02 PM, said:

 Tennes, on May 14 2009, 11:01 AM, said:

Well, to be honest I dont really want to get involved in the pissing contest that's starting to develop. Does anyone have anything levelheaded to discuss?

Lio thinks he's been targeted because UB guessed huis alt and Si; was talkin about how Gam was being too nice before the pissing started

I got that. Personally I think BB would hang back a little for the first few days. Even with the ability to pass the killer torch on (and the incredible paranoia that causes), getting killed early will be a big blow and with only two I dont see them sticking their necks out too early. In that sense people who hang back are valid enough suspects, but I suppose I'm also one of those, so yeah.

thats true and it does kinda discredit my Fener-Meanas bit not that ive really gone back and quoted and built that yet and yea them qualities would incude you but as you said if you were low post/content cause of the early start and ya pick it up soon youll be fine

[Silanah]

oh quick...by the way

Ive got SEXPO tomorrow...some of you should remember.
SO i will likely be posting from my phone till monday....


cheers losers

[Tennes]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 05:12 PM, said:

oh quick...by the way

Ive got SEXPO tomorrow...some of you should remember.
SO i will likely be posting from my phone till monday....


cheers losers

SEXPO time again? As if you werent easy enough to alt-guess as it is

[Meanas]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:06 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 04:03 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

Actually Silanah, you attacked me 4 times while I was asleep, and I ignored them. You then posted this when I wasn't talking to you or attacking you in any way, which I then responded to.

I'm sorry that how you wanted the thread to go and how it actually went are different, but it happens.

attacked you while you sleep?
The only things i have ever said while you are not here is commenting on posts of your while catching up.
hardly "attack" stuff.

So calling me scum in posts 684, 685, and 694 dosen't constitute an attack? And yet just before you were claiming that I was attacking you by saying you were overreacting.

Apparently you can call people scum numerous times in a row without it being an attack, but if someone says you are overreacting, obviously they are commiting a viscious attack upon you!

[Meanas]

 Tennes, on May 14 2009, 10:13 AM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 05:12 PM, said:

oh quick...by the way

Ive got SEXPO tomorrow...some of you should remember.
SO i will likely be posting from my phone till monday....


cheers losers

SEXPO time again? As if you werent easy enough to alt-guess as it is

Oh please, we all had it at the end of yesterday with the angry phone antics.

[Korvalain]

Okay, read through Gamelon, and most of the stuff was worthless. He agreed with a lot of people, he opened his posting with a blow-by-blow summary of the game up to that point, and he spends a lot of posts deciphering our silenced companions pictographs. But in his third post, something caught my eye. Its easy to pass off as a spelling mistake, but it seems awfully convenient given the subject matter of this game.

 Gamelon, on May 13 2009, 08:19 AM, said:

 Liosan, on May 13 2009, 10:51 AM, said:

Wow. I expected a few pages from when I went to bed.

That's because Rashan hasn't been here.


However, there is actually some interesting stuff coming out now.
The post by Korlat is a indeed strange. An attack on Emur seems a little unwarrented, especially on evidence that seems more like a hunch. The "obvious" comment could just be poor wording, but the speculation about who silenced who is just going to tie everything in knots this early. I wasn't here for the other Benses game, so I've been thinking about the silencing factor. How effective can speculating about this be? Tennes is saying it's useless and Kesso is saying that suggesting it's not important sounds scummy. It might be important at some point, but IMO speculating might obfuscate things more than it helps if we over analyse it.

edit: crosspost with silanah and kesso

For those who want to know, or don't know, the correct spelling is unwarranted. I doubt spelling will get anyone lynched ever, but I think this is worth a vote, in my mind.

vote Gamelon

Crosspost with the entire fucking page.

This post has been edited by Korvalain: 14 May 2009 - 03:16 PM