[Ruse]

@Meanas: Read my response to fener's post, which was probably lost in a flurry of x-posts.

I see you went after Silanah when you agreed with Fener. From none of your posts did I read an inkling regarding other reasoning for your attack...as for the reaction, well, that'd necessitate a reread that I'll do when I get back.

That was unclear.
1.) You accused Sil of symping you
2.) You accused Rashan and HP of being partners
3.) You accused Rashan and Sil of being partners, and Sil was distancing from him
Not the ideal link, but it irks me.

And now I'm off. Back in 4ish hours.

[Meanas]

Well, if you don't like me pointing out that you just took everything he wrote at face value and didn't read the actual quotes, don't do it anymore.

Easy.

[Silanah]

 Gamelon, on May 14 2009, 03:25 PM, said:

So your vote basically boils down to "you're too nice". Got it.

Also, please see my second post above about the 'woodwork'.

well...no
My vote is based on a logical deduction.

In a game were a killer is on his own...he tends to be quieter and should be a low poster.
I went through all of the low posters posts and found you to be the most agreeable person.
Also you have been very happy to go woth most of the cases people have put out there without question.
You never question the person attacking another person...not that i could find....you only ever agree and vote.

there is however korvalain...who is similar to you but i felt he was a bit less agreeable than yourself.
pitty no one else is even bothering looking at what i am saying so watever.

[Fener]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:01 AM, said:

Well i went from the bottom up on the post count list and felt

Tennes - just hasnt posted enought o get a read, yet he does voice a few good points IIRC didnt agree with just any old case.

Fener - well, he is somewhat fixated on myself, i know certain people who do that as inno and as killers alike... i cant really figure out what his problem is...or if he is scum. Dont understand his lack of being able to look at things from both inno and scum persective...
perhaps a cynic at heart? Or scum that is not bothered to try and look at more inno's to try and fabricate scum looking "cases".

Ruse - seems ok to me, questions allot of cases and definitely doesnt just go with the flow.

Gamelon - Goes with the flow, very helpful, doesn't get in anyones face. Just middle the road kinda guy....your average hide in plain sight kinda guy.

Korvalain - much of the same as gamelon but he definitely questions things/cases more.

and thats where is stopped...wasted my time looking through kessoh...bah


Vote Gamelon

Of the low posters, you seem the most agreeable guy and dont make any waves when possible.
Never really question any cases put forward and seem to liek most cases out there...an inno is allot more paranoid about any case that has been put forward than what you have been.

I gotta say, Im leaning more with Meanas than against him. In the quote above Sil pretty much cleared Ruse, yet in Meanas' post and Ruses subsequent defense with quotes of himself, Ruse has done anything but go against the flow of things.

[Silanah]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:27 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:20 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:17 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

I should mafia rage like you did all day yesterday?

would be better than than your lame answers, at least that would give us info on your character...now you wont give anything.
like you got something to hide.
Or someone who has to rain himself in because he is afraid of all the attention going berserk would cause.

Really? Did you forget that I didn't even vote for you before you tweaked out and starting swearing on thread?

Welcome to strawman central.

@ Ruse - Where you claimed that I said Silanah was symping Rashan, if you actually read the quote, I said he was symping me. But that dosen't fit in your case, so you decided to just write it differently in the hope that sheep like Gamelon wouldn't read the actual quotes, just what you say about them. Grats on knowing how to manipulate people I guess?

I notice you have yet to ask why I went after Silanah yesterday. Do you disagree that he went absolutely nuts when I said I would be willing to vote for him, even though I still had a vote on Rashan until he was modkilled?

I also think its interesting that Fener voted for Silanah today, from what I can tell to see if he would freak out again, and you jumped in and defended Silanah. Why is that?

a vote means FUCK ALL...if you keep slamming someone its an attempt at discrediting and might aswell be a vote.
Its like me calling you scum but because "i never put a vote down" you cant refute my claim?

So i will answer any accusations in any manner i please i am not scared of what people think, unlike some people, if you think going "nuts" on thread is a sign of guilt then go right ahead and keep up your narrow minded charade....see if i care.
people that can actually see whats going on will know you for what you are.
I always get pissed off when people use the lamest cases against me....and even more pissed when retords buy into those lame cases...but watever, keep gunning for one person see how far that gets you.

[Silanah]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:27 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:20 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:17 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

I should mafia rage like you did all day yesterday?

would be better than than your lame answers, at least that would give us info on your character...now you wont give anything.
like you got something to hide.
Or someone who has to rain himself in because he is afraid of all the attention going berserk would cause.

Really? Did you forget that I didn't even vote for you before you tweaked out and starting swearing on thread?

Welcome to strawman central.

@ Ruse - Where you claimed that I said Silanah was symping Rashan, if you actually read the quote, I said he was symping me. But that dosen't fit in your case, so you decided to just write it differently in the hope that sheep like Gamelon wouldn't read the actual quotes, just what you say about them. Grats on knowing how to manipulate people I guess?

I notice you have yet to ask why I went after Silanah yesterday. Do you disagree that he went absolutely nuts when I said I would be willing to vote for him, even though I still had a vote on Rashan until he was modkilled?

I also think its interesting that Fener voted for Silanah today, from what I can tell to see if he would freak out again, and you jumped in and defended Silanah. Why is that?

a vote means FUCK ALL...if you keep slamming someone its an attempt at discrediting and might aswell be a vote.
Its like me calling you scum but because "i never put a vote down" you cant refute my claim?

So i will answer any accusations in any manner i please i am not scared of what people think, unlike some people, if you think going "nuts" on thread is a sign of guilt then go right ahead and keep up your narrow minded charade....see if i care.
people that can actually see whats going on will know you for what you are.
I always get pissed off when people use the lamest cases against me....and even more pissed when retards buy into those lame cases...but watever, keep gunning for one person see how far that gets you.

[Fener]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:32 AM, said:

 Gamelon, on May 14 2009, 03:25 PM, said:

So your vote basically boils down to "you're too nice". Got it.

Also, please see my second post above about the 'woodwork'.

well...no
My vote is based on a logical deduction.

In a game were a killer is on his own...he tends to be quieter and should be a low poster.
I went through all of the low posters posts and found you to be the most agreeable person.
Also you have been very happy to go woth most of the cases people have put out there without question.
You never question the person attacking another person...not that i could find....you only ever agree and vote.

there is however korvalain...who is similar to you but i felt he was a bit less agreeable than yourself.
pitty no one else is even bothering looking at what i am saying so watever.

Sil, now stop that, I have read every post, including the WIFOM above, and thats why its not very good, you seem to be convinced of something that I, for one , cant see. Mostly I guess its because you say above that the killer tends to be quieter, and that may be, but its no real case in this particular game, where the killer may very well be in the mid to upper posters. Its not really a case, when its guess work, is it?

[Silanah]

 Fener, on May 14 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:01 AM, said:

Well i went from the bottom up on the post count list and felt

Tennes - just hasnt posted enought o get a read, yet he does voice a few good points IIRC didnt agree with just any old case.

Fener - well, he is somewhat fixated on myself, i know certain people who do that as inno and as killers alike... i cant really figure out what his problem is...or if he is scum. Dont understand his lack of being able to look at things from both inno and scum persective...
perhaps a cynic at heart? Or scum that is not bothered to try and look at more inno's to try and fabricate scum looking "cases".

Ruse - seems ok to me, questions allot of cases and definitely doesnt just go with the flow.

Gamelon - Goes with the flow, very helpful, doesn't get in anyones face. Just middle the road kinda guy....your average hide in plain sight kinda guy.

Korvalain - much of the same as gamelon but he definitely questions things/cases more.

and thats where is stopped...wasted my time looking through kessoh...bah


Vote Gamelon

Of the low posters, you seem the most agreeable guy and dont make any waves when possible.
Never really question any cases put forward and seem to liek most cases out there...an inno is allot more paranoid about any case that has been put forward than what you have been.

I gotta say, Im leaning more with Meanas than against him. In the quote above Sil pretty much cleared Ruse, yet in Meanas' post and Ruses subsequent defense with quotes of himself, Ruse has done anything but go against the flow of things.

And how well has the "flow" been doing ?

[Fener]

You know what, I think Sils anger is unfounded, and I am having a hard time not linking Sil and Ruse together. However, Sil seems to be drawing attention. So maybe Sil is UB and Ruse is BB?

Remove Vote
Vote Ruse

For being symped by Silanah

[Tennes]

Sorry to the people who have said I hevent contributed anything. The game starting a day early really messed with my schedule, should have a bit more time to play now. Skimmed through a whole bunch of cases to get caught up, will do a proper reread shortly. Of everyone I think I like Meanas or Fener the most for a lynch today, but like I said, I need to do a proper read.

[Fener]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:42 AM, said:

 Fener, on May 14 2009, 03:37 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:01 AM, said:

Well i went from the bottom up on the post count list and felt

Tennes - just hasnt posted enought o get a read, yet he does voice a few good points IIRC didnt agree with just any old case.

Fener - well, he is somewhat fixated on myself, i know certain people who do that as inno and as killers alike... i cant really figure out what his problem is...or if he is scum. Dont understand his lack of being able to look at things from both inno and scum persective...
perhaps a cynic at heart? Or scum that is not bothered to try and look at more inno's to try and fabricate scum looking "cases".

Ruse - seems ok to me, questions allot of cases and definitely doesnt just go with the flow.

Gamelon - Goes with the flow, very helpful, doesn't get in anyones face. Just middle the road kinda guy....your average hide in plain sight kinda guy.

Korvalain - much of the same as gamelon but he definitely questions things/cases more.

and thats where is stopped...wasted my time looking through kessoh...bah


Vote Gamelon

Of the low posters, you seem the most agreeable guy and dont make any waves when possible.
Never really question any cases put forward and seem to liek most cases out there...an inno is allot more paranoid about any case that has been put forward than what you have been.

I gotta say, Im leaning more with Meanas than against him. In the quote above Sil pretty much cleared Ruse, yet in Meanas' post and Ruses subsequent defense with quotes of himself, Ruse has done anything but go against the flow of things.

And how well has the "flow" been doing ?

Poorly, iMO. But you said Ruse was going against that, and he hasn't been, he's been going WITH the flow. What kind of response is that, anyway?

Edit: reponse was in the quote tags

This post has been edited by Fener: 14 May 2009 - 02:45 PM

[Meanas]

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:39 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:27 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:20 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:17 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

I should mafia rage like you did all day yesterday?

would be better than than your lame answers, at least that would give us info on your character...now you wont give anything.
like you got something to hide.
Or someone who has to rain himself in because he is afraid of all the attention going berserk would cause.

Really? Did you forget that I didn't even vote for you before you tweaked out and starting swearing on thread?

Welcome to strawman central.

@ Ruse - Where you claimed that I said Silanah was symping Rashan, if you actually read the quote, I said he was symping me. But that dosen't fit in your case, so you decided to just write it differently in the hope that sheep like Gamelon wouldn't read the actual quotes, just what you say about them. Grats on knowing how to manipulate people I guess?

I notice you have yet to ask why I went after Silanah yesterday. Do you disagree that he went absolutely nuts when I said I would be willing to vote for him, even though I still had a vote on Rashan until he was modkilled?

I also think its interesting that Fener voted for Silanah today, from what I can tell to see if he would freak out again, and you jumped in and defended Silanah. Why is that?

a vote means FUCK ALL...if you keep slamming someone its an attempt at discrediting and might aswell be a vote.
Its like me calling you scum but because "i never put a vote down" you cant refute my claim?

So i will answer any accusations in any manner i please i am not scared of what people think, unlike some people, if you think going "nuts" on thread is a sign of guilt then go right ahead and keep up your narrow minded charade....see if i care.
people that can actually see whats going on will know you for what you are.
I always get pissed off when people use the lamest cases against me....and even more pissed when retords buy into those lame cases...but watever, keep gunning for one person see how far that gets you.

And yet, I didn't build a case against you or vote for you today, did I?

You are the one that keeps bringing it up. I do enjoy the insinuation that I have something to hide every time you make a post.

Oh wait, you just swore at me again, for no reason. You really should calm down man, that vein pulsing in your head isn't good for anyone.

[Silanah]

 Fener, on May 14 2009, 03:40 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 10:32 AM, said:

 Gamelon, on May 14 2009, 03:25 PM, said:

So your vote basically boils down to "you're too nice". Got it.

Also, please see my second post above about the 'woodwork'.

well...no
My vote is based on a logical deduction.

In a game were a killer is on his own...he tends to be quieter and should be a low poster.
I went through all of the low posters posts and found you to be the most agreeable person.
Also you have been very happy to go woth most of the cases people have put out there without question.
You never question the person attacking another person...not that i could find....you only ever agree and vote.

there is however korvalain...who is similar to you but i felt he was a bit less agreeable than yourself.
pitty no one else is even bothering looking at what i am saying so watever.

Sil, now stop that, I have read every post, including the WIFOM above, and thats why its not very good, you seem to be convinced of something that I, for one , cant see. Mostly I guess its because you say above that the killer tends to be quieter, and that may be, but its no real case in this particular game, where the killer may very well be in the mid to upper posters. Its not really a case, when its guess work, is it?

its all guess work dumb ass...the entire game.
Nothing is certain...

And excuse ME?...but how and who i put pressure on has FUCK ALL to do with you!!
If you dont agree then dont vote, but dont tell me to "stop" anything...since you are in capable of stopping anything yourself.

[Fener]

Sil, youve been pissed all game, and youve recieved a massive total of 4 votes, 2 of which were from me (one yesterday and one today). How about practicing what your preaching and look at the other cases that have been put forth. Oh, wait, you can't you'd have to vote off your master if you did that, right? (/sarcasm)

[Silanah]

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:45 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:39 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:27 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:20 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:17 PM, said:

 Silanah, on May 14 2009, 09:15 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 03:12 PM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 09:09 AM, said:

 Meanas, on May 14 2009, 10:04 AM, said:

 Ruse, on May 14 2009, 08:58 AM, said:

Nice job jumping ahead 24 hours between your last 2 quotes. I haven't been as active as I'd prefer, but I've done what I could to contribute. All you've done is antagonize.

I didn't feel like quoting the other 15 'I'm here but not actually saying anything' quotes. If what you have done so far is 'contributing', we have a different definition of that word.

And the extent of your posts consist of antagonizing Silanah and commentating the game.

At least some of my posts have made semi-original points.

No, it isn't.

And no, they haven't.

what a great rebuttal

I should mafia rage like you did all day yesterday?

would be better than than your lame answers, at least that would give us info on your character...now you wont give anything.
like you got something to hide.
Or someone who has to rain himself in because he is afraid of all the attention going berserk would cause.

Really? Did you forget that I didn't even vote for you before you tweaked out and starting swearing on thread?

Welcome to strawman central.

@ Ruse - Where you claimed that I said Silanah was symping Rashan, if you actually read the quote, I said he was symping me. But that dosen't fit in your case, so you decided to just write it differently in the hope that sheep like Gamelon wouldn't read the actual quotes, just what you say about them. Grats on knowing how to manipulate people I guess?

I notice you have yet to ask why I went after Silanah yesterday. Do you disagree that he went absolutely nuts when I said I would be willing to vote for him, even though I still had a vote on Rashan until he was modkilled?

I also think its interesting that Fener voted for Silanah today, from what I can tell to see if he would freak out again, and you jumped in and defended Silanah. Why is that?

a vote means FUCK ALL...if you keep slamming someone its an attempt at discrediting and might aswell be a vote.
Its like me calling you scum but because "i never put a vote down" you cant refute my claim?

So i will answer any accusations in any manner i please i am not scared of what people think, unlike some people, if you think going "nuts" on thread is a sign of guilt then go right ahead and keep up your narrow minded charade....see if i care.
people that can actually see whats going on will know you for what you are.
I always get pissed off when people use the lamest cases against me....and even more pissed when retords buy into those lame cases...but watever, keep gunning for one person see how far that gets you.

And yet, I didn't build a case against you or vote for you today, did I?

You are the one that keeps bringing it up. I do enjoy the insinuation that I have something to hide every time you make a post.

Oh wait, you just swore at me again, for no reason. You really should calm down man, that vein pulsing in your head isn't good for anyone.

shall i keep repeating myself?
Vote doesnt mean jack shit if you keep posting slander....DOH

and i never swore AT you, i swore whilst talking to you....there is a difference.
FUCK YOU....is swearing AT you....just saying fuck is not.
I wont change my posting style for anyone...if it appears that my vein is popping to you, then watever.
translates differently on paper i suppose.
Shall i put in some smileys to make my posts go down better ....there you go.

[Silanah]

 Fener, on May 14 2009, 03:48 PM, said:

Sil, youve been pissed all game, and youve recieved a massive total of 4 votes, 2 of which were from me (one yesterday and one today). How about practicing what your preaching and look at the other cases that have been put forth. Oh, wait, you can't you'd have to vote off your master if you did that, right? (/sarcasm)

pot calling the kettle

[Silanah]

funny thing is...im not even angry

[Emurlahn]

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

[Silanah]

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 03:52 PM, said:

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

I could see that being the case.
But goddamn that would be too obvious....woulnt it?

[Meanas]

 Emurlahn, on May 14 2009, 09:52 AM, said:

tbh Im starting to think Meanas and Fener are UB & BB, Fener was startin to take heat and Meanas came on and went to wra against Ruse and Sil to take the haet off Fener while Fener retreats from his failed Sil attack and now Fener joins in on Meanas vote.
Theyre trying to hide it buty reread it witht his in mind and I think its evident theyre playing off of each other

Now Now, unfounded accusations are unfounded. If you actually read the thread, Silanah started in at me today, after I posted a case about Ruse, not the other way around.

As for Fener, I have no idea what he is doing, but with the way Silanah is playing I can't fault him for questioning him.