Mafia 45 - The Princess Bride Game Thread
#261
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:20 PM
=/
Seems like me considering Korvalain's revelation of something that's probably only detrimental to the inno team is suddenly scummy?
I wholeheartedly agree with the idea to lynch the average, out-of-the-way, non-confrontational sort of people. The people who're trying too hard to fit in. That's the group most scum (except the ballsy ones who go all-out trying to fuck with everyone) will be hiding in.
Also, I'm detecting a resurgence of the "This game is going nowhere boohoo" sort of hit-and-run posts. We eradicated them for a couple games, but now.. :S
Ampelas stands to mind, by the way. Pops in, talks about how the game's pathetic (sort of rescinds this comment when called out on it though), then announces what he's doing several times.
Some food for thought. I'm around for a while until my next class, then gone for a while depending on the weather.
Seems like me considering Korvalain's revelation of something that's probably only detrimental to the inno team is suddenly scummy?
I wholeheartedly agree with the idea to lynch the average, out-of-the-way, non-confrontational sort of people. The people who're trying too hard to fit in. That's the group most scum (except the ballsy ones who go all-out trying to fuck with everyone) will be hiding in.
Also, I'm detecting a resurgence of the "This game is going nowhere boohoo" sort of hit-and-run posts. We eradicated them for a couple games, but now.. :S
Ampelas stands to mind, by the way. Pops in, talks about how the game's pathetic (sort of rescinds this comment when called out on it though), then announces what he's doing several times.
Some food for thought. I'm around for a while until my next class, then gone for a while depending on the weather.
#262
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:21 PM
Ok, I've finished my analysis and will now put up the results, together with some quotes from various people - this may take some time to post, so bear with me...I'll basically explain why I highlighted the people I did, put up some of their more interesting posts (interesting being a relative term here), try to cut it down from there to just a couple of people, and finally put up my own vote. Anyway, as I said, this will take some time.
If someone comes up with something terrific in the meantime, feel free to ignore me!
If someone comes up with something terrific in the meantime, feel free to ignore me!
#263
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:37 PM
D'riss, on May 5 2009, 04:20 PM, said:
I wholeheartedly agree with the idea to lynch the average, out-of-the-way, non-confrontational sort of people. The people who're trying too hard to fit in. That's the group most scum (except the ballsy ones who go all-out trying to fuck with everyone) will be hiding in.
Like I said, I also agree, but one caveat is that it might be hard to detect properly on day 1. More than half the people have less than 10 posts so far.
But let's see what Meanas will say.
#264
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:39 PM
I'm back for a bit. Would someone like to summarize the days events for me, please? I am not in the mood to read through pages of spam
#265
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:42 PM
Silanah, on May 5 2009, 04:39 PM, said:
I'm back for a bit. Would someone like to summarize the days events for me, please? I am not in the mood to read through pages of spam
D'riss made a killer slip by posting a PM to the mods on thread instead and is now at L-1, and his symp (Tellan) revealed as a healer to try to save him, but a finder counter-revealed saying he day-investigated him as a symp, so we're doing quite well

#266
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:44 PM
Cannot say much has happened since i was last on, of the other players i think korvalain had the strangest reaction and i am tempted to make a case based on their response when questioned about the silanah vote.
#268
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:45 PM
You know the sheeple are going to read that and vote it up!

#270
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:47 PM
#271
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:50 PM
#273
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:55 PM
Tellan, on May 6 2009, 01:50 AM, said:
That was the first post when I logged on. You had me for a second. I was thinking no way a killer makes that kind of mistake on day one. But there were only 2 pages since I hopped on last night. I figured you were messing with people when I got to the vote count.
#274
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:56 PM
Galain, on May 5 2009, 09:42 AM, said:
Silanah, on May 5 2009, 04:39 PM, said:
I'm back for a bit. Would someone like to summarize the days events for me, please? I am not in the mood to read through pages of spam
D'riss made a killer slip by posting a PM to the mods on thread instead and is now at L-1, and his symp (Tellan) revealed as a healer to try to save him, but a finder counter-revealed saying he day-investigated him as a symp, so we're doing quite well

What?!?!?!
Vote D'riss
Let's lynch that bastard!
Oh, wait. Shit.
Remove vote
#275
Posted 05 May 2009 - 01:58 PM
I have to go, I'm a bit disappointed by Silanah's recent posts, I was waiting for him to see if I should keep my vote.
My case is around and not hard to follow, but for those who only skim (quite a few, it seems)
1) D'riss over-reaction to a semi-joke vote by Korvalain on Silanah, as if he felt he needed to "diffuse" the pressure quickly
2) Kessobahn saying "innos have lovers too", as if the "partner" case had any validity. It's like he knew that Silanah had a partner indeed and tried to defend him by saying "Err, well, he's paired, but so are some innos, right?". That Kesso post was bizarre, then he disappeared.
3) Someone once said "Vote D'riss, though I'm less suspicious of Silanah". I have no idea what it means, but once again someone feels the need to mention Silanah is less suspicious for some reason, as if he ever really was.
That's it and all, maybe it's all wrong interpretations and nothing but coincidences and akward wordings, but that's what I saw until now.
Will be back soon.
My case is around and not hard to follow, but for those who only skim (quite a few, it seems)
1) D'riss over-reaction to a semi-joke vote by Korvalain on Silanah, as if he felt he needed to "diffuse" the pressure quickly
2) Kessobahn saying "innos have lovers too", as if the "partner" case had any validity. It's like he knew that Silanah had a partner indeed and tried to defend him by saying "Err, well, he's paired, but so are some innos, right?". That Kesso post was bizarre, then he disappeared.
3) Someone once said "Vote D'riss, though I'm less suspicious of Silanah". I have no idea what it means, but once again someone feels the need to mention Silanah is less suspicious for some reason, as if he ever really was.
That's it and all, maybe it's all wrong interpretations and nothing but coincidences and akward wordings, but that's what I saw until now.
Will be back soon.
#276
Posted 05 May 2009 - 02:04 PM
Galain, on May 5 2009, 02:58 PM, said:
I have to go, I'm a bit disappointed by Silanah's recent posts, I was waiting for him to see if I should keep my vote.
My case is around and not hard to follow, but for those who only skim (quite a few, it seems)
1) D'riss over-reaction to a semi-joke vote by Korvalain on Silanah, as if he felt he needed to "diffuse" the pressure quickly
2) Kessobahn saying "innos have lovers too", as if the "partner" case had any validity. It's like he knew that Silanah had a partner indeed and tried to defend him by saying "Err, well, he's paired, but so are some innos, right?". That Kesso post was bizarre, then he disappeared.
3) Someone once said "Vote D'riss, though I'm less suspicious of Silanah". I have no idea what it means, but once again someone feels the need to mention Silanah is less suspicious for some reason, as if he ever really was.
That's it and all, maybe it's all wrong interpretations and nothing but coincidences and akward wordings, but that's what I saw until now.
Will be back soon.
My case is around and not hard to follow, but for those who only skim (quite a few, it seems)
1) D'riss over-reaction to a semi-joke vote by Korvalain on Silanah, as if he felt he needed to "diffuse" the pressure quickly
2) Kessobahn saying "innos have lovers too", as if the "partner" case had any validity. It's like he knew that Silanah had a partner indeed and tried to defend him by saying "Err, well, he's paired, but so are some innos, right?". That Kesso post was bizarre, then he disappeared.
3) Someone once said "Vote D'riss, though I'm less suspicious of Silanah". I have no idea what it means, but once again someone feels the need to mention Silanah is less suspicious for some reason, as if he ever really was.
That's it and all, maybe it's all wrong interpretations and nothing but coincidences and akward wordings, but that's what I saw until now.
Will be back soon.
You know i would add that it looked like korvalain made a poor case citing silanah and his partner possibly to prove to silanah that he knew they had a partner (ie he was pointing out his sympish status) and then when driss rubbished the case he jumped out to say it wasnt a case before it picked up steam. We then had then had those others jump in.
remove vote
vote silanah
Thats stronger than my case on ruse.
I know that it is hard being a member of the town, but it seems like many people arent trying very hard to participate in the game, hopefully things pick up soon.
#277
Posted 05 May 2009 - 02:06 PM
My personal interpretation:
Korvalain placed a vote with a peculiar explanation. He claimed that Silanah's "slip" (I quote that because it's nothing close) indicated he had a partner. I noticed this after skimming through several pages, saw that several people mentioned it, an (egregiously) assumed there was legitimate thought/agreement. My remark about it is over-reacting, I guess, and some might construe this post to be the same. I'm unsure how to refute that since this is how I'm accustomed to posting. =/
Afterward, Kessobahn semi-agreed with me. Think about it for a sec: someone pointed out a clue that could lead to an inno pair, a prime target for an NK. The same thing happened last game or the game before I think, and I don't recall it helping anyone.
Korvalain over-reacted (see what I did there?) to my response's phrasing and put a vote on me. Others followed suit.
Shadow voted for me and insisted on mentioning that Silanah was less suspicious than I was. Some have considered that potentially scummy.
Honestly, most of the shit raining down on me at the moment is people blowing up my somewhat exaggerated wording to epic proportions. But hey, you're welcome to reread it and make your own judgments.
(Prepared for huge x-post).
Korvalain placed a vote with a peculiar explanation. He claimed that Silanah's "slip" (I quote that because it's nothing close) indicated he had a partner. I noticed this after skimming through several pages, saw that several people mentioned it, an (egregiously) assumed there was legitimate thought/agreement. My remark about it is over-reacting, I guess, and some might construe this post to be the same. I'm unsure how to refute that since this is how I'm accustomed to posting. =/
Afterward, Kessobahn semi-agreed with me. Think about it for a sec: someone pointed out a clue that could lead to an inno pair, a prime target for an NK. The same thing happened last game or the game before I think, and I don't recall it helping anyone.
Korvalain over-reacted (see what I did there?) to my response's phrasing and put a vote on me. Others followed suit.
Shadow voted for me and insisted on mentioning that Silanah was less suspicious than I was. Some have considered that potentially scummy.
Honestly, most of the shit raining down on me at the moment is people blowing up my somewhat exaggerated wording to epic proportions. But hey, you're welcome to reread it and make your own judgments.
(Prepared for huge x-post).
#278
Posted 05 May 2009 - 02:11 PM
Silanah? You are talking about me, correct? Point me to the posts that imply I am paired, if you would. I have been rather busy over the last day, and I think I've posted about three times; so an effort by a killer/symp to make me look paired ALREADY is rather annoying.
So, Shadow and Kessobahn, right. Give me a minute.
So, Shadow and Kessobahn, right. Give me a minute.
#279
Posted 05 May 2009 - 02:12 PM
Silanah, on May 4 2009, 10:00 AM, said:
That was the extent of Korv's case.
edit: OH SHIT I CALLED IT A CASE I MUST BE OVERREACTING ZOMG!!!!CALL TEH MAFIA COPS
This post has been edited by D'riss: 05 May 2009 - 02:13 PM
#280
Posted 05 May 2009 - 02:16 PM
I believe I just successfully scared away 3 4 lurkers. High five!
edit: 4 now!
edit: 4 now!
This post has been edited by D'riss: 05 May 2009 - 02:16 PM