[Silanah]

some of you gys are in for an interesting read....

and I admit to holding up the night, because i wanted to discuss the implications of the end of the day with more people than just Kaschan

[Silanah]

Emurlahn, on Apr 14 2009, 09:56 AM, said:

btw is this a record or something for the longest game? o.O

yes, it is

[Silanah]

lol, you would say that....

[Emurlahn]

That's to be expected, since you're now the prime suspect of being our rigger if you aren't.

Oh, and you were "cleared" by HP on absolutely no basis whatsoever. I think we have a team on our hands, folks.

edit: @barghast

This post has been edited by Emurlahn: 14 April 2009 - 02:23 PM

[Hood's Path]

Emurlahn, on Apr 14 2009, 10:17 AM, said:

@HP: That'd be Eric Doyle.

Ah right, thanks.

But if we though Parkman to be the rigger then I would have expected to see 2 different riggings, since there was 2 Parkmen. Possibly due to failure of actions but who knows.

edit: crosspost.

This post has been edited by Hood's Path: 14 April 2009 - 02:24 PM

[Emurlahn]

Hood's Path, on Apr 14 2009, 10:24 AM, said:

Emurlahn, on Apr 14 2009, 10:17 AM, said:

@HP: That'd be Eric Doyle.

Ah right, thanks.

But if we though Parkman to be the rigger then I would have expected to see 2 different riggings, since there was 2 Parkmen. Possibly due to failure of actions but who knows.

edit: crosspost.

If we follow that logic, each Sylar would have a kill and we could've had a shitload of NK's every night. But there wasn't.

Well I'm off, you know the drill...although no practice today so I'll actually be back ~8pm gmt.

[Hood's Path]

Let me say this now,

I am not on a team with Barghast, never have been. I was protecting him out of something that you, Emur, said which turned out to be me getting what you said wrong. I believe that Barghast is now the most likely canadiate for rigger and my vote will be on him first thing.

If I was teamed with him and he was the rigger, I would have no reason to do that because then that team would have numbers due to Barghast, whoever he rigs, and myself. But that is untrue and I'm not teamed with him.

[Silanah]

chill, would you?

there's a reason they make them 8 hours long

emu, I don't recalll HP clearing Barg, can you please give post reference?

also, I'm still believing HP about his healer reveal, unless he's our fourth Peter, since he is the only one who may heal AND kill, afaik.

[Emurlahn]

Saw this right before I left.
@HP: You made that claim when there were 8 or 9 players; 3 was nothing close to a majority and we aren't speed-lynching at the slightest hint anymore. I don't recall anythign about misinterpreting my words, either, but I'll have to check when I get home.

[Emurlahn]

http://www.malazanempire.com/IPBforum/inde...st&p=570709

that was his reasoning for clearing.

[Silanah]

yes, the problem is, if he is teamed, we can't allow an NK tonight--unless it's on his partner.

now, there is another killer out there--we know that because of the double death of Korlat and DiBs.

If D'riss isthe killer,a nd they are paired with barg, and they get a kill tonight, it's game over.
and I don't want that.

[Silanah]

Barghast, on Apr 14 2009, 10:31 AM, said:

The reason nights are 8 hours long is so that if people cannot be on to see the lynch.

Refusing to put in night actions to artificially extend the length of the night is blatantly against the rules, read the rules post in any and every game.

Dude, I feel that the actions this night determine if the game continues beyond tomorrow or not.
I need to think.

I have anther 5 hours at my disposal for that.
it's as simple as that, ok?

[Hood's Path]

Well I based my defense of Barghast on you saying he had high ap before the vote rigging had already begun. If that was the case then we should have seen rigging throughout the game, which afaik we haven't. Obviously that is a logical assumption.

Unfortunately, you Emur, had you day count confused thinking it was day 7 rather than day 9. Meaning that Barghast, according to you, had high ap during this time period of rigging, not before. So I mistakenly cleared on something that you were confused on. If I were on Barghast's team at this point I wouldn't argue so hard against it because we'd have 3/6 votes. But I am not.

edit: post 2444 states the same thing as above when I tried to clear Barghast. The post that Emur showed doesn't do me justice because it gives no reasoning.

This post has been edited by Hood's Path: 14 April 2009 - 02:37 PM

[Silanah]

read the thread, would you?
D'riss has more point than me.
as do you, as does HP.

it's really up to him to guess correctly on this,

I don't have a lot of options, but I need to think through several scenarios.

i'm also wondering why D'riss disapeared all of a sudden..

[Silanah]

Hood's Path, on Apr 14 2009, 10:35 AM, said:

Well I based my defense of Barghast on you saying he had high ap before the vote rigging had already begun. If that was the case then we should have seen rigging throughout the game, which afaik we haven't. Obviously that is a logical assumption.

Unfortunately, you Emur, had you day count confused thinking it was day 7 rather than day 9. Meaning that Barghast, according to you, had high ap during this time period of rigging, not before. So I mistakenly cleared on something that you were confused on. If I were on Barghast's team at this point I wouldn't argue so hard against it because we'd have 3/6 votes. But I am not.

edit: post 2444 states the same thing as above when I tried to clear Barghast. The post that Emur showed doesn't do me justice because it gives no reasoning.

actually, with potentially 2 killers loose, you'd have every reason to distance yourself the hell away from the supposed rigger,

but, for better or worse, I believe you.