Mafia 40.75 or is that 39.62?
#962
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:40 PM
2 Kills.. if im correct that there is only 1 killer for each of the 2 scum, Sil wasn't scum..
#963
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:40 PM
vote Galayn lord
what Serc said
what Serc said
This post has been edited by Telas: 11 March 2009 - 08:40 PM
#964
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:43 PM
#965
#966
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:49 PM
#967
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:51 PM
rofl
I don't recall calling the coin flip rational
I wasn't sure about a Silanah lynch
he brought up stuff on D'riss that made me hesitate. at the same time, Fener chimed in, defending Silanah in favour of 'Driss, as well.
out of the 3, i'd have preferred to lynch korlat, which is what I said on thread.
when I thought the time was up, I asked the people on thread, should I hammer or not. the consensus was "we're not sure"
as I was also unsure, i did what I always do when faced with a binary decision i'm unsure about--I flipped a coin.
note that after I announced I wasn't gonna hammer on thread, there were another 30 minutes or so, during which Fener, D'riss, Kas, or Emu could've all said "wtf kind of thing to do is that?" yet no one said anyhting till the next day.
and please look at the start of my train, yesterday, and compare that with how the Silanah train went day 1... and tell me you don't see similarities..
I don't recall calling the coin flip rational
I wasn't sure about a Silanah lynch
he brought up stuff on D'riss that made me hesitate. at the same time, Fener chimed in, defending Silanah in favour of 'Driss, as well.
out of the 3, i'd have preferred to lynch korlat, which is what I said on thread.
when I thought the time was up, I asked the people on thread, should I hammer or not. the consensus was "we're not sure"
as I was also unsure, i did what I always do when faced with a binary decision i'm unsure about--I flipped a coin.
note that after I announced I wasn't gonna hammer on thread, there were another 30 minutes or so, during which Fener, D'riss, Kas, or Emu could've all said "wtf kind of thing to do is that?" yet no one said anyhting till the next day.
and please look at the start of my train, yesterday, and compare that with how the Silanah train went day 1... and tell me you don't see similarities..
#968
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:52 PM
2 Killer factions
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
#969
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:55 PM
Kaschan, on Mar 11 2009, 03:52 PM, said:
2 Killer factions
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
assume WIFOM?
#970
Posted 11 March 2009 - 08:58 PM
Telas, on Mar 11 2009, 04:51 PM, said:
rofl
I don't recall calling the coin flip rational
I wasn't sure about a Silanah lynch
he brought up stuff on D'riss that made me hesitate. at the same time, Fener chimed in, defending Silanah in favour of 'Driss, as well.
out of the 3, i'd have preferred to lynch korlat, which is what I said on thread.
when I thought the time was up, I asked the people on thread, should I hammer or not. the consensus was "we're not sure"
as I was also unsure, i did what I always do when faced with a binary decision i'm unsure about--I flipped a coin.
note that after I announced I wasn't gonna hammer on thread, there were another 30 minutes or so, during which Fener, D'riss, Kas, or Emu could've all said "wtf kind of thing to do is that?" yet no one said anyhting till the next day.
and please look at the start of my train, yesterday, and compare that with how the Silanah train went day 1... and tell me you don't see similarities..
I don't recall calling the coin flip rational
I wasn't sure about a Silanah lynch
he brought up stuff on D'riss that made me hesitate. at the same time, Fener chimed in, defending Silanah in favour of 'Driss, as well.
out of the 3, i'd have preferred to lynch korlat, which is what I said on thread.
when I thought the time was up, I asked the people on thread, should I hammer or not. the consensus was "we're not sure"
as I was also unsure, i did what I always do when faced with a binary decision i'm unsure about--I flipped a coin.
note that after I announced I wasn't gonna hammer on thread, there were another 30 minutes or so, during which Fener, D'riss, Kas, or Emu could've all said "wtf kind of thing to do is that?" yet no one said anyhting till the next day.
and please look at the start of my train, yesterday, and compare that with how the Silanah train went day 1... and tell me you don't see similarities..
I remember calling you a coward for not making a call one way or the other.....wishy washy.....I believe you even said you would hammer him more than once. All talk?
Edit: I'm out for the next three hours
This post has been edited by D'riss: 11 March 2009 - 09:00 PM
#971
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:03 PM
more discussion ensued
I wasn't convinced he was scum
we were already a person down from a modkill.
lol, w/e, its pretty obvious a bunch of you are hell bent on lynching me. I'm roleless, so I couldn't care less--at least you're not looking at a foinder/healer.
however, I do think it prudent to point out that my train's just the kind of easy lynch the scum may want.
and that it'd be a good idea to at least CONSIDER the circumstances, making the assumption that I may be inno.
i mean, you seem to pride yourself on your multi-perspective view of the game D'riss
assume for a second that I am indeed a cowardl inno and look at my train from that perspective.
might give you some insight.
I wasn't convinced he was scum
we were already a person down from a modkill.
lol, w/e, its pretty obvious a bunch of you are hell bent on lynching me. I'm roleless, so I couldn't care less--at least you're not looking at a foinder/healer.
however, I do think it prudent to point out that my train's just the kind of easy lynch the scum may want.
and that it'd be a good idea to at least CONSIDER the circumstances, making the assumption that I may be inno.
i mean, you seem to pride yourself on your multi-perspective view of the game D'riss
assume for a second that I am indeed a cowardl inno and look at my train from that perspective.
might give you some insight.
#972
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:07 PM
Telas, on Mar 11 2009, 03:55 PM, said:
Kaschan, on Mar 11 2009, 03:52 PM, said:
2 Killer factions
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
Rules state 2 kills per night
I thought that the factions might be 1 killer and a symp per or something but they might be partnered killers.. I dont know
either way, with the lynch of sil and then 2 nks, im not sure what we are supposed to assume
assume WIFOM?
Give me your opinion on how you think the teams are set up?
#973
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:08 PM
Ah, right, Kaschan brings up a good point about still having two kills last Night.
Remove Vote
Hmmm. Silanah not being a Killer (with 2 Kills last night, assuming one wasn't a vig) ... sort of unravels an entire chain of potential guilt. I'm not saying it clears both Telas and Korlat ... but it dramatically reduces the chances of them being a group of scum.
Which means we're all chasing down the wrong path.
No, Telas, this doesn't mean I agree with you on GL.
Remove Vote
Hmmm. Silanah not being a Killer (with 2 Kills last night, assuming one wasn't a vig) ... sort of unravels an entire chain of potential guilt. I'm not saying it clears both Telas and Korlat ... but it dramatically reduces the chances of them being a group of scum.
Which means we're all chasing down the wrong path.
No, Telas, this doesn't mean I agree with you on GL.
#974
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:11 PM
2 killer teams, 1 symp knows both
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
#975
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:12 PM
Serc, on Mar 11 2009, 04:08 PM, said:
Ah, right, Kaschan brings up a good point about still having two kills last Night.
Remove Vote
Hmmm. Silanah not being a Killer (with 2 Kills last night, assuming one wasn't a vig) ... sort of unravels an entire chain of potential guilt. I'm not saying it clears both Telas and Korlat ... but it dramatically reduces the chances of them being a group of scum.
Which means we're all chasing down the wrong path.
No, Telas, this doesn't mean I agree with you on GL.
Remove Vote
Hmmm. Silanah not being a Killer (with 2 Kills last night, assuming one wasn't a vig) ... sort of unravels an entire chain of potential guilt. I'm not saying it clears both Telas and Korlat ... but it dramatically reduces the chances of them being a group of scum.
Which means we're all chasing down the wrong path.
No, Telas, this doesn't mean I agree with you on GL.
lol
my poor heart weeps at that,

#976
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:12 PM
Telas, on Mar 11 2009, 02:11 PM, said:
2 killer teams, 1 symp knows both
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
My sort-of-theory is two 3-scum teams, with a single Symp each and paired Killers. The pairing of the Killers, with the resultant indecisiveness, would sort of balance the high ratio of scum.
#977
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:16 PM
The only reason I dont think that there is paired killers is because its supposed to be low tmdi... but I think in the sign up that it was meant for low players and that roles might have been modified
wcs would be imo..
2 teams of 3 scum, 2 paired and a symp
or it might be
2 teams of 1 killer and a symp
or something like that
wcs would be imo..
2 teams of 3 scum, 2 paired and a symp
or it might be
2 teams of 1 killer and a symp
or something like that
#978
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:21 PM
meh
nohing to prevent them from being paired.
our WCS is two killer pairs and 2 all-knowing symps
work off that in your assumptions.
nohing to prevent them from being paired.
our WCS is two killer pairs and 2 all-knowing symps
work off that in your assumptions.
#979
#980
Posted 11 March 2009 - 09:25 PM
Telas, on Mar 11 2009, 11:11 PM, said:
2 killer teams, 1 symp knows both
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
or
2 killers, 2-3 symps, know both
i'm assuming the scum number 4-5, because as general rule scum compose about a quarter of the players, and if we go with 6, as some proposed, that's a third, which is too much even with the chances of mutual kills, imho
There are also people who judge 1/3 the proper division. Mentalist, for one. Question is not what seems the general rule, but what Obdi judges amusing and suitable for tdmi 2.
Moreover, to kick in an open door, it suits you very well to reason there's only 4 scum, especially 1 killer + symp per team, as that pleads for you being a VPI. Scum craves that status as it allows them the freedom to go about their business unhindered (another thing that goes without saying).
Quote
lol, w/e, its pretty obvious a bunch of you are hell bent on lynching me. I'm roleless, so I couldn't care less--at least you're not looking at a foinder/healer.
Also, what I still don't understand: you never seemed to care to bring up any arguments (like the modkill) as a reason for not lynching day 1, iirc. Yet you mention it now. As I said at the start of day 2, you should have a PoV on whether or not a lynch in general on day 1 would be adviseable. You never mentioned it, you never seemed to care, but did take the time to devote a post or three to the coin flip. Meh.
I don't want to repeat yesterday in having a fast lynch, but I'm very happy to vote for you again today.