[Korlat]

wait.. what's the vote count? I haven't seen one around lately.

[Anomandaris]

@ Tennes - I didn't put a vote on you because its not really that big of a deal, but you were, I believe the 2nd person to vote for Galain as a "joke". and he hops back on, says "funny how I have 2 votes" and you quickly remove yours. Like I said not that important, but scum sometimes try to look too innocent.

@ Telas - I do understand that its weak, but it is worth keeping an eye on, thats why I posted it. Its not a case, more of an observation.

[Telas]

there was one on last page.
it's a standard day 1 spread so far

[Korlat]

Anomandaris, on Mar 9 2009, 05:34 PM, said:

@ Tennes - I didn't put a vote on you because its not really that big of a deal, but you were, I believe the 2nd person to vote for Galain as a "joke". and he hops back on, says "funny how I have 2 votes" and you quickly remove yours. Like I said not that important, but scum sometimes try to look too innocent.

@ Telas - I do understand that its weak, but it is worth keeping an eye on, thats why I posted it. Its not a case, more of an observation.

but surely this early in day 1, a vote is pretty much the only thing you can use to push for a reaction? Why so worried placing a vote down this early?

[Korlat]

Telas, on Mar 9 2009, 05:34 PM, said:

there was one on last page.
it's a standard day 1 spread so far

ah, I missed it then, will be right back

[Anomandaris]

Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 06:41 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Mar 9 2009, 05:34 PM, said:

@ Tennes - I didn't put a vote on you because its not really that big of a deal, but you were, I believe the 2nd person to vote for Galain as a "joke". and he hops back on, says "funny how I have 2 votes" and you quickly remove yours. Like I said not that important, but scum sometimes try to look too innocent.

@ Telas - I do understand that its weak, but it is worth keeping an eye on, thats why I posted it. Its not a case, more of an observation.

but surely this early in day 1, a vote is pretty much the only thing you can use to push for a reaction? Why so worried placing a vote down this early?

Joke votes are one thing, but putting a vote down would mean I think my "case" is good enough to lynch over. Its not. The reaction might be, but at this point I am not willing to let one post and a reaction post start a lynch train. Blood thirsty much?

[Telas]

Ano, putting down the first vote's not the same as "starting a lynch train"

[Korlat]

Anomandaris, on Mar 10 2009, 12:43 AM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 06:41 PM, said:

Anomandaris, on Mar 9 2009, 05:34 PM, said:

@ Tennes - I didn't put a vote on you because its not really that big of a deal, but you were, I believe the 2nd person to vote for Galain as a "joke". and he hops back on, says "funny how I have 2 votes" and you quickly remove yours. Like I said not that important, but scum sometimes try to look too innocent.

@ Telas - I do understand that its weak, but it is worth keeping an eye on, thats why I posted it. Its not a case, more of an observation.

but surely this early in day 1, a vote is pretty much the only thing you can use to push for a reaction? Why so worried placing a vote down this early?

Joke votes are one thing, but putting a vote down would mean I think my "case" is good enough to lynch over. Its not. The reaction might be, but at this point I am not willing to let one post and a reaction post start a lynch train. Blood thirsty much?

That's a pretty weak counter argument Anomandaris, and not to mention nothing more than a poor attempt to remove whatever value my comment had by giving it an unpopular label. That's hardly the typical trait of an innocent.

And then, looking beyond your bloodthirsty thing, your argument makes little sense. How many votes were there on Tennes? And a lynch train this early? That's a bit of an irrational fear don't you think?

[Korlat]

ah, I see Telas beat me to the lynch train part

[Anomandaris]

Telas, on Mar 9 2009, 06:45 PM, said:

Ano, putting down the first vote's not the same as "starting a lynch train"

It isn't but if I add my vote to Korlat's its 2 votes and the first"serious" train running. We all know how quickly that turns into a , well, theres nothing better so I'll vote x. Honestly, I don't feel its enough to vote for, so I wont. As to Korlat saying that Tennes reaction post was vote worthy and that my"case" needed a vote to get a reaction, he just proved my point, its not needed to get a reaction, its needed to add pressure, there isn' enough to go on for pressure to be added, right now anyway. I'll vote when I see someone doing something like pushing a shitty case, or a slip. Not because I saw one post that looked questionable.

[Telas]

wha?

2 votes don't make it a major train.
once you get into 4-5, yes, that's when it snowbals.

refusing to land a second vote b/c you're afraid of a lynch.... that's paranoic, even by mafia standards.

[Korlat]

carefully sidestepping the "bloodthirsty" comment of yours. One could almost think you a killer.

[Korlat]

fucking hell Telas. Stop saying the stuff I am going to say!

[Telas]

or how about you stop symping me,

[Korlat]

Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 12:54 AM, said:

or how about you stop symping me,

yeah, well, if you hadn't magically changed your posting times to match mine, you'd be on thin ice

[Telas]

Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 05:54 PM, said:

Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 12:54 AM, said:

or how about you stop symping me,

yeah, well, if you hadn't magically changed your posting times to match mine, you'd be on thin ice

who do you think I am?

[Anomandaris]

@ Telas - I would have been the first, that was the point Korlat was making, why didn't I vote. I responded, its not vote worthy, just needed to be pointed out.

@ Korlat - the bloodthisty thing was not because you voted, but instead you voted Tennes, then questoned(and continue to question) why I didn't vote for him. So now, in effect, your last post calls me scummy, thats why I say blood thirsty. IMO its easier to point fingers when you yourself are scum. Make sense?

One more point, why hhaven't you asked why I din't vote for Gamelon? I believe that "case" to be the stronger of the two? hmm.

Edit": added O to IMO

This post has been edited by Anomandaris: 09 March 2009 - 10:59 PM

[Korlat]

Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 12:55 AM, said:

Korlat, on Mar 9 2009, 05:54 PM, said:

Telas, on Mar 10 2009, 12:54 AM, said:

or how about you stop symping me,

yeah, well, if you hadn't magically changed your posting times to match mine, you'd be on thin ice

who do you think I am?

I don't know. ... Spartacus?

anyways, we're letting Anomandaris off the hook. I don't like it..

In fact, I find him more suspicious than Tennes at this point.

Anomandaris

[Fener]

I think you are Telas, but that's just me.

Sorry Silanah, misunderstood what you were referring to.

Remove Vote

[Korlat]

Anomandaris, on Mar 10 2009, 12:57 AM, said:

@ Telas - I would have been the first, that was the point Korlat was making, why didn't I vote. I responded, its not vote worthy, just needed to be pointed out.

@ Korlat - the bloodthisty thing was not because you voted, but instead you voted Tennes, then questoned(and continue to question) why I didn't vote for him. So now, in effect, your last post calls me scummy, thats why I say blood thirsty. IM its easier to point fingers when you yourself are scum. Make sense?

One more point, why hhaven't you asked why I din't vote for Gamelon? I believe that "case" to be the stronger of the two? hmm.

It's good that some of us have a bit of an imagination.

I voted Tennes. Then I asked you why you didn't back your accusation up with a vote. You then called me bloodthirsty.. Because I asked you one question. That's hardly the pressuring nor continous questions I'd say lead up to the label bloodthirsty. Trying to place that label on me right away – if you can make it stick – can in essence invalidate pretty much anything I try to push further today. Now why would an innocent do that? I don't see it.