Kessobahn, on Feb 21 2009, 11:01 PM, said:
Tennes, on Feb 21 2009, 10:52 PM, said:
Kessobahn, on Feb 21 2009, 10:37 PM, said:
Tennes, on Feb 21 2009, 10:33 PM, said:
Kessobahn, on Feb 21 2009, 10:21 PM, said:
IMO it is something to worry about because we might be able to garner some information if they were in fact extra alts rather than mod characters by looking at who they seemed to be supporting etc.
Have you looked?
I have indeed, there are some links I can draw but they are
a little tenuous. However I would prefer not to reveal them since if I am wrong then it's 1. misleading and 2. I might get killed to misdirect. and if I am right, then I might get killed for hitting on something.
Does this not strike anyone else as odd? Kesso has found information from earlier in the thread, but doesn't want to reveal it?
1. All cases could be misleading. That's the nature of the game.
2. Any time you make a case you might get killed to misdirect. Live with it.
3. Since when have mafia players refrained from posting something that might lead to the killers because it
might be right? That's insane.
Any info we can get is useful at this point. If you believe that Shadow and Ruse were controlled by the ninjas, as you definitely profess to, surely if you've found something that could link them to a player you'd tell us straight away?
I still think your earlier attack on Emurlahn was suspicious. But this post is a hell of a lot worse.
Note the emboldened part. I am not even completely convinced by some of them myself, and given the reasons I have posted, I believe I might well die if I did try and draw links which might well be completely wrong and I feel I can contribute more by being alive.
So you think your links are a little tenuous. So? Why didn't you post them and let us decide that?
Again, the possibility of drawing links that may be wrong or might get you killed is part of mafia, and happens with every case. If you're more worried about saving yourself than finding the ninjas, why should we keep you around?