[Meanas]

Well I see Tennes. So if he will contribute then that will take the low non contributing players down to two.

[Korlat]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 12:33 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 21 2009, 09:27 PM, said:

Well, let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet ...

But it has been such a long time.

 Shadow, on Jan 21 2009, 12:35 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 21 2009, 12:27 PM, said:

Well, let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet ...

But Ruse brought a whole bag for everyone!!! you're no fun

I can't believe a Pulp Fiction reference just went by unrecognized ...

[Path-Shaper]

It is day 2, 26 hours left in the day

20 players still playing, 11 votes to lynch, 10 votes for night

1 vote Galain (Korlat)
1 vote Tennes (Mockra)
2 votes Korlat (Anomandaris, Fener)
2 votes Silanah (Meanas, Shadow)


14 have not voted: Ampelas, D'riss, Galain, Galayn Lord, Hood's Path, Kaschan, Kessobahn, Liosan, Omtose, Rashan, Ruse, Silanah, Tennes, Thyrllan.


You kids are once again modless for a few hours. Don't break anything and stay away from the liquor cabinet

[Meanas]

 Korlat, on Jan 21 2009, 09:39 PM, said:

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 12:33 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 21 2009, 09:27 PM, said:

Well, let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet ...

But it has been such a long time.

 Shadow, on Jan 21 2009, 12:35 PM, said:

 Korlat, on Jan 21 2009, 12:27 PM, said:

Well, let's not start sucking each other's dicks just yet ...

But Ruse brought a whole bag for everyone!!! you're no fun

I can't believe a Pulp Fiction reference just went by unrecognized ...

Don't feel bad I through in a good quote from SNL's Coffee talk last night and no one got that.

[Ampelas]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 10:13 PM, said:

 Kaschan, on Jan 21 2009, 08:31 PM, said:

 Ampelas, on Jan 21 2009, 07:28 PM, said:

And thanks Rashan, play does seem to be getting better. I was impressed with how quickly this game got serious.

Actually, I don't think the level of spam has anything to do with new players, or even the quality of play, it's to do with which players are on together at a certain time.

I do wish that the first 15 pages of day one had a bit more content to them, though.

Think that is bad go and read day one of the drunken game, or of the insane asylem game. Those were fun day ones. No content at all till sometime in day 2.

Hehe, I remember. Venge and two others decided it would be fun to make up illnesses and only speak nonsense for the first two days. What a mess. I like the case on Silanah. If the post that avoids modkill isnt full of contenty goodness I will be willing to put my vote there. Unless Rashan's scum sign looks convincing. I am going to sleep now, but I should be on around end of day tomorrow.

[Fener]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 03:32 PM, said:

 Fener, on Jan 21 2009, 09:25 PM, said:

 Hood's Path, on Jan 21 2009, 02:57 PM, said:

 Shadow, on Jan 21 2009, 11:24 AM, said:

Wow- caught up I now hate the Illiad, Thyr and Ruse

Unfortunately I think we have a classic inno pissing contest. Fine, it seems over. good.

The HP case, I thought was really good yesterday, even today it rings a bit true. He middle of the roaded it yesterday and has been straight defensive from what I can recall today.

@HP who are some of your suspects. why?

To be honest at the moment no one is really jumping out at me. There aren't any cases I would consider very strong. I'm going to go back and ook into the Ruse, Thyrllan argument. There was alot being thrown back and forth there, it could be less than just a differing of opinions. In an effort to be a little less "middle of the road" I'm going to reserve judgement until I am more sure.

As to me being defensive today I probably am. I didn't think Thyrllan's case on D'riss and I was very strong in the first place. I also found it weird that it came as late as it did when there was very little chance of derailing the train against Serc. I've tried to explain my actions several times now, but alas to little avail.

Bolded part is my point: Isn't that the definition of middle of the roading?

 Shadow, on Jan 21 2009, 03:22 PM, said:

@ Meanas

I like the Post on Silanah

remove vote

vote Silanah

I would happily vote off Tennes, GL or Silanah as my personal Philosophy is that they (low posters) are hurting us now, but will hurt us infinatly more later. If Sil shows some gameplay in the future I will reconsider.

I don't think we need to worry about lynching Silanah. He hasn't been on all day, I don't think I've seen him since before Night. He'll be modkilled soon. If he posts and has no content, then by all means I'll hop on this, but I think if we're out for a low poster then we should be after a subsistence low poster.

Two votes when we need 11 (or nine since there seem to be people with multi vote powers about) are just the beginning of pressure. Plus Sil was on after the morning scene which means that he has only been inactive for a short while. I have every confindence that he will get on and post a one line comment. If he sees some votes then perhaps he will contribute or panic(if scum).

Oh. Well then.

remove vote

vote Silanah

[Rashan]

Ok this will hopefully not be too long. But here is my case on Kess.

First curious post of his that I really don't get. There is alot of spam before this, but this struck me as a serious post

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 10:24 AM, said:

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 04:17 PM, said:

 Thyrllan, on Jan 19 2009, 04:14 PM, said:

I believe that was already mentioned somewhere, no?
You restating argument middle of the road scummy person you

But on a more serious note yes, that is probably the strangest thing amongst the RP.
Though Rashans vote on kaschan struck me as odd aswell, just a kinda gut thing.

Omtose does seem quite nervous, it is true.. And also Fener seems.. I dunno, strange. His vote too was odd.

you know what... this tickles me enough in the wrong way I think Omtose just moved up as the strongest killer candidate.. all the joking aside that post really stood out.
Omtose

He quotes his own quote and then votes because of it? But to continue he starts disagreeing with himself

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 10:50 AM, said:

it will always be gut on the first day, and in all honesty I am of two minds about Omtose. For one I don't like the post and the nervousness it radiates, but at the same time I do recognice that small things become huge in the absence of larger blocks of information – which is essentially why day 1 lynches are as odd as they are – ergo I may be less objective in this regard than I would've liked. Omtose is a strong player, if a bit too willing to parrot my every say in an attempt to seem wise, and so I am not quite convinced we should move to lynch him today..

But at the same time, he seems so guilty!

He will get called out for being middle of the road, and puts on a good defense, but this post is really what starts my case, the others are just background

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 11:08 AM, said:

 Hood's Path, on Jan 19 2009, 04:59 PM, said:

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 07:50 AM, said:

it will always be gut on the first day, and in all honesty I am of two minds about Omtose. For one I don't like the post and the nervousness it radiates, but at the same time I do recognice that small things become huge in the absence of larger blocks of information – which is essentially why day 1 lynches are as odd as they are – ergo I may be less objective in this regard than I would've liked. Omtose is a strong player, if a bit too willing to parrot my every say in an attempt to seem wise, and so I am not quite convinced we should move to lynch him today..

But at the same time, he seems to guilty!

He does seem very guilty! The thing about it is he's not really doing anything to deny the guilt. It seems odd to me, at first he was nervous about it and now he's throwing it all out there in a way. Very erratic behaviour! An attempt at some reverse psychology perhaps?

the best way to avoid this kind of thing is to ignore it.. unless someone latches on. Unfortunately for the killers, it's often difficult to do that.

Now stay with me, its an odd thing to do, defend against your own case. Like I said he gets called on it and puts up a reasonable defense, but this behavior could be a bit of signaling to your masters. Now lets get some meat as to why I think he's scummy

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 11:31 AM, said:

Well I am glad that you're not willing to put pressure based on specific posts. I'm posting what I think. I try to keep my thought prosess as transparent as possible so that people understand how I view the game. If you feel that what I say in my posts is middle of the road..erm.. ing then I think we just clash in our way of approaching the game

Here I removed the case by Serc, this is his response, notice the use of the word transparent. Strikes me as a bit odd. but lets continue

 Kessobahn, on Jan 19 2009, 03:56 PM, said:

Or I might have possibly been joking. So many layers

Again I have removed alot of content but this is joking, but could be hinting. Now here is why he has been hinting IMO note the bold

 Kessobahn, on Jan 20 2009, 05:13 AM, said:

 Thyrllan, on Jan 20 2009, 11:07 AM, said:

remove vote, vote mockra


2. No one else seems to see emur as scum, and he's defended his vote, and im satisfied with that.

I see emur as scum, but I lack anything but a feeling to back it up. I might also be biased by his out of the blue I-must-contribute-but-i'm-afraid-to-do-so vote on me

next is this no explanation for anyone on his list.

 Kessobahn, on Jan 20 2009, 01:11 PM, said:

 Liosan, on Jan 20 2009, 04:39 PM, said:

Sorry for the lack of posts today but I am getting really slammed in work.

I am quite nervous by how quickly the train has grown though. That is eight votes and serc hasn't had a chance to respond to any of the points made against him. I believe we still have quite a long time left today, but as i am unsure if i will be on later i am leaving my vote where it is. Could someone who will be on closer to the deadline and has voted remove temporarily? Or at least can i urge patience until Serc speaks and is given a chance to address the points i made.

I like how you distance yourself from the lynch train you created. This is about the sneakiest way to try to dodge blame if Serc comes up innocent and I do not like it one bit. You're not on the top of my list yet (mainly because I try my best to avoid meta), but you've climbed quite far in just that little piece of yours.

and my list, for those who wonder:
Emurlahn
Omtose
Fener

... Which I guess warrants a change in votes.

Emurlahn

ANd finally our little Creature is proud of himself, note he never brings up the fact that the creature was the one who killed Emur.

So I say, You are signaling your necro masters, not sure if its Ruse or Thyr, although I am leaning towards Thyr right now. Anyway, thats my case, alot of spam mixed in with some questionable posts, while staying out of sight. Not the best case ever, but I believe it has merit.

[Meanas]

So are you going to vote for him Rashan or are you just laying out a case for the rest of us to see.

[Rashan]

 Kessobahn, on Jan 21 2009, 05:35 AM, said:

ahahahahahahahahahahaha! .. Emurlahn was evil, and I am thus god for spotting it. Now, that makes me utterly convinced there's a killer early on the Serc train.

Here is where he is proud of himself fogot to paste it in there.

[Rashan]

Vote Kessobahn

Sorry took a long time and work, hard to keep everything together,lol

[Fener]

He could be scum, waiting for approval before he comes out and votes his own train. I've done that before and almost been killed for it.

[Fener]

 Rashan, on Jan 21 2009, 03:58 PM, said:

Vote Kessobahn

Sorry took a long time and work, hard to keep everything together,lol

Oh, and there's the vote. nvm my prior statement.

[Meanas]

I was also going to add that it is a nice looking case. There does seem a lot of suspicious behavior there.



Edit: Cross post galore..

This post has been edited by Meanas: 21 January 2009 - 09:00 PM

[Fener]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 03:59 PM, said:

I was also going to add that it is a nice looking case. There does seem a lot of suspicious behavior there.

I suppose, but then again, he's claiming to have fingered me and Kasch as Necros. I'd like him to present that case before we lynch him, just for the lulz.

[Meanas]

Tennes I still see you and you haven't even posted a hello.


Rashan I am going to keep my pressure vote on Sil for now but I like your case on Kesso and if Sil gets on and decides to participate then I would be willing to switch.

[Meanas]

 Fener, on Jan 21 2009, 09:01 PM, said:

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 03:59 PM, said:

I was also going to add that it is a nice looking case. There does seem a lot of suspicious behavior there.

I suppose, but then again, he's claiming to have fingered me and Kasch as Necros. I'd like him to present that case before we lynch him, just for the lulz.

Well one vote doesn't make a lynch. Plus I doubt that there will be a speed lynch or anything like that. So unless a day vig takes him out he should be around to both answer the case against him and to explain his accusations of you and kasch.

[Fener]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 04:07 PM, said:

 Fener, on Jan 21 2009, 09:01 PM, said:

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 03:59 PM, said:

I was also going to add that it is a nice looking case. There does seem a lot of suspicious behavior there.

I suppose, but then again, he's claiming to have fingered me and Kasch as Necros. I'd like him to present that case before we lynch him, just for the lulz.

Well one vote doesn't make a lynch. Plus I doubt that there will be a speed lynch or anything like that. So unless a day vig takes him out he should be around to both answer the case against him and to explain his accusations of you and kasch.

Yeah, but I just want to sound like I have something to say.

[Meanas]

So sorry...

I did just notice that Tennes was on for over an half an hour and didn't post once. So either he has finally logged in invisible or he has logged of with out posting. When he is a low poster that is pretty scummy behavior. People are calling you out all over the place for not posting anything and what do you do log in so that everyone can see you then not post anything. If I wasn't already voting for a low poster I would cast my vote for him over that move alone.

[Korlat]

 Meanas, on Jan 21 2009, 01:13 PM, said:

So sorry...

I did just notice that Tennes was on for over an half an hour and didn't post once. So either he has finally logged in invisible or he has logged of with out posting. When he is a low poster that is pretty scummy behavior. People are calling you out all over the place for not posting anything and what do you do log in so that everyone can see you then not post anything. If I wasn't already voting for a low poster I would cast my vote for him over that move alone.

I'd just like to point out that, by my principles, voting for low-posters so early in the game is a waste of time, and indeed counter-productive.

Edit: And that pushing to lynch low-posters very early in the game isn't just counter-productive, but scummy, thus my continued vote on Galain.

This post has been edited by Korlat: 21 January 2009 - 09:23 PM

[Mockra]

Greetings all, I have returned
seems we are chock-full of cases today.

Kas, I really don't see how I can defend myself better than I did---short of doing somehting radicall and uncalled for, like revealing

"Case on me is based ont he fact that I disagreed with 2 players that put the first two votes on my alleged "master"
aside from the obvious "omg-what-kind-of-an-idiot-do-you-think-I-am,-jumping-to-rescue-my-master-from-L-9" argument, I also once again point your attention that looking for symps is useless unless it leads to locating the masters.
I will do us all a favour and skip the "I'm-not-scum" argument, since the only way for you to actually be sure of that is to lynch me.