What did that Seerdomin do to Stonny?
#21
Posted 07 February 2006 - 07:33 PM
Basicly your trying to say that because their religous fanatics you beleive they dont follow the normal rules of victorios armies and because there cannibals. This is tru i suppose to a point but they are still all different. From what we know stonny attracted alot of male attemtion throught the book she probably caught the seerdomins eye. We know there not all utterly devoted to the seer (like tocs seerdomin who helped him) so this one probably still has different urges.
#22 Guest_Sonnyboy_*
Posted 07 February 2006 - 08:55 PM
Actually, I'm trying to say that I didn't see them as mere religious fanatics at all.
#23
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:52 PM
Your saying you cant see why they would pass their training? well the seerdomin are better fed and better treated. Thats a reason and its an alternative to the tenescowri. So as to the fact that it was a supernatural thing well the pannion seer was being manipultaed by the crippled god so the tenescowri and the seerdomin see him as a god and do what he wants and burn the land as their all canibals therefore food was uneeded (?). The seerdomin probably raped stonny due to his
Lust as shes meant to be attractive
Battle lust was upon him
He fancied doin it(its just that simple)
He did it because he could
Even if the pannion was incharge of every1 then the seerdomin coukld still do what they want all that way away from the empire.
Personally i think your reading to much into. The event was designed by Erikson to outlay the horrors of war and a good reason for gruntle to go psycho and kill the pannions. Therefore their is no higher calling. He probably did it because he could and no one would stop him.
Lust as shes meant to be attractive
Battle lust was upon him
He fancied doin it(its just that simple)
He did it because he could
Even if the pannion was incharge of every1 then the seerdomin coukld still do what they want all that way away from the empire.
Personally i think your reading to much into. The event was designed by Erikson to outlay the horrors of war and a good reason for gruntle to go psycho and kill the pannions. Therefore their is no higher calling. He probably did it because he could and no one would stop him.
#24 Guest_Sonnyboy_*
Posted 07 February 2006 - 09:57 PM
Okay. Fair enough. I suspected I was reading too much into the Pannion Domin. I think SE might have done too good a job impressing me with the savage monstrosity of the Pannions early on in the novel that by the time we're actually fighting in the streets I didn't see it brought back down to earth. That's how I remember it, anyway. Maybe I'll have to read it again, I dunno.
#25
Posted 07 February 2006 - 10:23 PM
yeh it was just a good reason to stir gruntle against the pannions. And it worked lets be honest:). But the way he wrote it down did make it a powerful scene i agree i myself studied the reasons behind then realised why am i doing this? its just a reason for gruntle to go mad
#26 Guest_erisi236_*
Posted 20 February 2006 - 05:07 PM
course it does seem a bit odd that in the middle of a pitched battle that some dude would take the time for such an act, and then leave her be and go off to do something else only to get KO'd and butchered by her, in the middle of a battle with thousands of guys "boiling over the walls" as Stonny put it.
*shrug*
It got Gruntle to act anyway, and thats what it was there for.
*shrug*
It got Gruntle to act anyway, and thats what it was there for.

#27
Posted 20 February 2006 - 06:32 PM
As I saw it, the "savage monstrosity of the pannions" were mostly in the tenescowri part of the army. The tenescowri were cannibals. Changed. But the other troops were not changed. The beklites seemed organised enough, but were chrushed by the malazan infantry. The skalandi were skirmishers, and skirmishing don't go well with mindless bloodlust(I think). The Urdomen and Seerdomin were elites, but not changed like the tenescowri. I think you can see the non-tenescowri pannions as rather ordinary soldiers.
#28
Posted 20 February 2006 - 07:51 PM
Quote
course it does seem a bit odd that in the middle of a pitched battle that some dude would take the time for such an act, and then leave her be and go off
im pretty sure he didnt take the time to set the mood or try to build it with foreplay or anything. he wanted to break her, so he raped her and left her. im pretty sure he figured she was done with, her spirit completly shattered.
#29 Guest_erisi236_*
Posted 21 February 2006 - 03:20 PM
it's still an odd thing to do in the middle of a fight like that *shrug*
now that I think on it it wouldn't surpise me if it was a God that muddled his mind, Treach most likely, in order to get his Mortal Sword into action, Malazan Gods seem to be like that
now that I think on it it wouldn't surpise me if it was a God that muddled his mind, Treach most likely, in order to get his Mortal Sword into action, Malazan Gods seem to be like that

#30
Posted 22 February 2006 - 05:05 AM
maybe im mistaken, but it wasent really "in the middle of a fight"
stonny was off alone in a room, and the seerdomin just busted in on here
stonny was off alone in a room, and the seerdomin just busted in on here
#31 Guest_erisi236_*
Posted 23 February 2006 - 07:48 PM
Well she said it was room by room fighting in that tower, so... I dunno, I'm sure the reasons for what the Seerdomin did could be debated endlessly.

#32 Guest_Dakkareth_*
Posted 24 February 2006 - 10:03 PM
Treach meddling certainly is a good explanation (and I have the feeling, Gruntle might have come across this thought as well).
#33
Posted 24 February 2006 - 11:42 PM
Well, it's a fact that battlefield rape has been with humanity as long as we've had battles. It's a rather unpleasant and totally disgusting fact, from what I understand it's a dominance thing, victor to victim. But it was easy to understand the way SE wrote it out imo.
#34 Guest_MPDFuzz_*
Posted 02 March 2006 - 06:41 PM
I am rereading this now, and get the feeling that Hood caused the rape. He made an alliance with Trake in order for Trake to get his mortal sword. I don't think it is inconcievable that Hood manipulated the Seerdomin into the rape, to cause the reaction neccessary in Gruntle to push him into the role as Mortal Sword.
#35
Posted 02 March 2006 - 07:37 PM
I still don't understand why people are so reluctant to accept the battlefield rape thing, unpleasant as it may be, but if you insist on seeing a god's hand in it then K'rul is a way more likely candidate than Hood.
Hood doesn't seem the subtle manipulative type, whereas it was K'rul who brought about Trake's assumption of the title of Lord of War (and I see his hand in the reunion of Togg & Fanny). it's only natural to assume K'rul would help out Trake with his new Mortal Sword, and that he would do it in some roundabout yet shrewd way. you might even be inclined to consider the death of Harllo in this light too, depending on how all-knowing and manipulative you think K'rul is.
Hood doesn't seem the subtle manipulative type, whereas it was K'rul who brought about Trake's assumption of the title of Lord of War (and I see his hand in the reunion of Togg & Fanny). it's only natural to assume K'rul would help out Trake with his new Mortal Sword, and that he would do it in some roundabout yet shrewd way. you might even be inclined to consider the death of Harllo in this light too, depending on how all-knowing and manipulative you think K'rul is.
#36
Posted 05 March 2006 - 12:19 AM
battlefield rapes happen all the time, in any army at any time in history. I am just unable to grasp how it would be difficult to believe that a soldier would take the time to rape a girl that tried to kill him in an almost patetich way.
I very very much doubt there was any god at all involved. Human bestiality was all that was need
I very very much doubt there was any god at all involved. Human bestiality was all that was need
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#37
Posted 05 March 2006 - 09:53 PM
i agree with morgoth... once battle lust takes over and you get the feeling of all pwoerful .. anything will happen... humans are not the moralistic good guy that we are tought to believe... we are still animals... with a veneer of civility... scrape that away and rape and so forth will become the norm...
#38 Guest_Dakkareth_*
Posted 05 March 2006 - 10:57 PM
Morgoth said:
I am just unable to grasp how it would be difficult to believe that a soldier would take the time to rape a girl that tried to kill him in an almost patetich way.
Well, I think few of us ever were in a similar situation ...

#39
Posted 06 March 2006 - 07:19 AM
people dont need a reason to rape they just do it. soldiers have been doin it since the romans. they do it to scare people and because there soldiers and no one can stop them. The doesnt have to be a morale justification
#40
Posted 14 March 2006 - 03:07 PM
Quote
I very very much doubt there was any god at all involved. Human bestiality was all that was need
I agree, that is what it comes down to. The inherent depravity of humans, and the basic urge to assert power/dominance over others.
Quote
they do it to scare people and because there soldiers and no one can stop them. The doesnt have to be a morale justification
Not even so much reason as scaring people. Mainly they do it because they can, without any dire consequences to them. IMO that is the main reason why especially somebody like a Seerdomin would commit rape: he is only responsible to the Seer - who does not care for such mundane affairs. They are the least pressed by social code, as they stand above it.