Mafia 35 game thread - Ghostbusters
#1461
Posted 10 December 2008 - 02:34 PM
This has came up in the past. Ask yellow, it probably depends on the game.
Also in what is it full of crap, that when two people are blatantly contradicting each other with what their actions did, that one is lying, and therefore likely scum?
Wow, thats some full of crap shit, that when two people contradict, one is lying.
Im so full of crap for thinking anything like that....
Also in what is it full of crap, that when two people are blatantly contradicting each other with what their actions did, that one is lying, and therefore likely scum?
Wow, thats some full of crap shit, that when two people contradict, one is lying.
Im so full of crap for thinking anything like that....
#1462
Posted 10 December 2008 - 02:45 PM
Cool, finder. Kinda fits for Peck, but I suppose he could be insane.
Id still like to know who you got as the could be involved, or do you think they're a GB?
Id still like to know who you got as the could be involved, or do you think they're a GB?
#1463
Posted 10 December 2008 - 02:45 PM
Fuck it's slow.
Too frustrating, I'll be back later. We have some serious stuff to digest anyways
Too frustrating, I'll be back later. We have some serious stuff to digest anyways
#1464
Posted 10 December 2008 - 02:48 PM
Hmm, I suppose from his point of view GBs would be "involved" in disturbances.
Might be better not to reveal.
Might be better not to reveal.
#1465
Posted 10 December 2008 - 02:49 PM
well i guarded you and i call fucking bullshit, because unless pathshaper just fucking ignored the fact i guarded you, you shouldnt have got any response if you are what you say you are.
emurlahn for talking bollocks.
emurlahn for talking bollocks.
#1466
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:05 PM
wheres the rest of post?? bloody board.
so whos the other guard then? come on i know your out there ya sneaky bugger
so whos the other guard then? come on i know your out there ya sneaky bugger
#1467
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:08 PM
it's day 4, about 34 hours left
10 of you are still alive (Rashan, Ruse, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Tennes, Fener, Mockra, Omtose, Emurlahn)
6 votes to lynch or go to night
1 vote for Mockra: Ruse
1 vote for Emurlahn: Mockra
8 people have not voted: Rashan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Tennes, Fener, Omtose, Emurlahn
board's having another meltdown it seems, i'm off for a bit, so you're modless.
play nicely, now.
10 of you are still alive (Rashan, Ruse, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Tennes, Fener, Mockra, Omtose, Emurlahn)
6 votes to lynch or go to night
1 vote for Mockra: Ruse
1 vote for Emurlahn: Mockra
8 people have not voted: Rashan, D'riss, Kessobahn, Korlat, Tennes, Fener, Omtose, Emurlahn
board's having another meltdown it seems, i'm off for a bit, so you're modless.
play nicely, now.
Only someone with this much power could make this many frittatas without breaking any eggs.
#1468
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:29 PM
never.
remove vote
pretty sure i was guarded. so if we have 5 ris, one pecker, 1 slimer, 1 guard,1 gb and 1 kilelr.
this game is pretty much over if theres a revealfest.
remove vote
pretty sure i was guarded. so if we have 5 ris, one pecker, 1 slimer, 1 guard,1 gb and 1 kilelr.
this game is pretty much over if theres a revealfest.
#1469
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:37 PM
Oh, in slow board hell there I had a cross-post with Emur's finder reveal.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
#1470
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:37 PM
Hmm, another guard is possible.
Either that, or one of you's lying.
Either that, or one of you's lying.
#1471
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:38 PM
Haha, I'm double posting too now.
This post has been edited by D'riss: 10 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
#1472
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:40 PM
Vote Mockra
You might have been gaurded, but if Emur is inno, you have turned evil. Evil is bad. Looking for a revealfest is bad as we don't have 5 Confirmed RI's. That was a fail statement
You might have been gaurded, but if Emur is inno, you have turned evil. Evil is bad. Looking for a revealfest is bad as we don't have 5 Confirmed RI's. That was a fail statement
#1473
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
On the other hand, I cant see him being "evil". I think the best way to proceed is to try find the killer. After all, with no one to kill people, scum cant win.
#1474
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
D'riss, on Dec 10 2008, 04:38 PM, said:
Oh, in slow board hell there I had a cross-post with Emur's finder reveal.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
I think I can recognize normal people as normal people, that I recognize GB as evil guys, and that I fail to spot ghosts/demons.
However, to test the theory fully, I need to examine one of each category, then see them lynched. Seeing how there's only 1 GB left and maybe 1 evil killer demon, this will become impossible.
Also, I had a reply to Mockra but I also got ISP errors, so it may be lost somewhere on the web, or it may be deleted by P-S.
I'm leaving for a couple of hours.
#1475
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:42 PM
Emurlahn, on Dec 10 2008, 04:34 PM, said:
Oki, I'm Peck, from the US Environmental protection agency, send to investigate the crisis.
Yes, that's right, I'm the little bastard who got the GB arrested and was then referred to as Dickless by one of the GB (had a youtube moment there), but I'm a Goodie none the less(and even if you refuse to believe that, the fact that I'm human means I don't have to be eliminated). I'm a Finder.
You spot the trouble, neh?
Peck was adamant in refusing to acknowledge ghosts and the need for the GB to be around and fighting them.
So, maybe I am an insane finder, but if so, who do I identify as what? There are 3 categories I think: normal human beings, paranormals, and GBs.
If insane, I'll spot GBs as bad guys, but that still leaves the ghosts, that I refuse to believe in...
Last night, I seized the opportunity to investigate a known RI (so VPI) and see how they came up, so I investigated HP.
He came up as 'not being involved in unpleasantries'.
That's all I wish to say for now. I'll also say that I have a person who gave a 'was causing problems' result.
EDIT: to paraphrase and not get suck into clause B7
Yes, that's right, I'm the little bastard who got the GB arrested and was then referred to as Dickless by one of the GB (had a youtube moment there), but I'm a Goodie none the less(and even if you refuse to believe that, the fact that I'm human means I don't have to be eliminated). I'm a Finder.
You spot the trouble, neh?
Peck was adamant in refusing to acknowledge ghosts and the need for the GB to be around and fighting them.
So, maybe I am an insane finder, but if so, who do I identify as what? There are 3 categories I think: normal human beings, paranormals, and GBs.
If insane, I'll spot GBs as bad guys, but that still leaves the ghosts, that I refuse to believe in...
Last night, I seized the opportunity to investigate a known RI (so VPI) and see how they came up, so I investigated HP.
He came up as 'not being involved in unpleasantries'.
That's all I wish to say for now. I'll also say that I have a person who gave a 'was causing problems' result.
EDIT: to paraphrase and not get suck into clause B7
Ok so I will agree that claiming Pecker is an insane finder makes sense, but then saying you got a non-guilty on HP is kind of redundant considering he is dead and cfed inno. So I want to see what everyone else has to say before jumping to the conclusion you are being honest with us.
As it is I might be willing to believe that GB's and Ghosts may come up guilty, but I doubt it. Either you are sane or insane and as you have claimed insane and got a sane result. I am claiming a contradiction.
On the other hand, I am disinclined to believe Mockra either. His attitude has been grating, but his claim of the switched night target strikes me as scummy, after all you have just got a finder to reveal.
@Mockra: you are claiming your victory conditions change with each guard? Well WTF? I never saw that, I was under the impression that you first guard of a roled player set your alignment, otherwise I reckon you are spouting BS and are just trying to keep yourself alive!
#1476
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
you do realise i said ri's not pi's??
i bet tennes is the guard, just by that statement. i assume your a goodie guard whoever guarded me.
i bet tennes is the guard, just by that statement. i assume your a goodie guard whoever guarded me.
#1477
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
D'riss, on Dec 10 2008, 04:38 PM, said:
Oh, in slow board hell there I had a cross-post with Emur's finder reveal.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
Purely based on the movie, I have to say I would be amazed if the US agency guy is good in this game as in normal finder playing for town.
In the movie he's a pain in the ass, he arrests the GBs, and unleash all the ghosts back in the city by forcing them to shut down their storage trap, and I fail to see where they redeem themselves.
So, insane/naive or paranoid finder could be an explanation, but since Emur claims he got different results, and confirmed himself on HP, he must be a "normal" finder.
So where's the twist? I can't believe Yellow would have chosen Pecker to be the inno/town finder. Something is amiss here.
I think I can recognize normal people as normal people, that I recognize GB as evil guys, and that I fail to spot ghosts/demons.
However, to test the theory fully, I need to examine one of each category, then see them lynched. Seeing how there's only 1 GB left and maybe 1 evil killer demon, this will become impossible.
Also, I had a reply to Mockra but I also got ISP errors, so it may be lost somewhere on the web, or it may be deleted by P-S.
I'm leaving for a couple of hours.
#1478
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:44 PM
you do realise i said ri's not pi's??
i bet tennes is the guard, just by that statement. i assume your a goodie guard whoever guarded me.
i bet tennes is the guard, just by that statement. i assume your a goodie guard whoever guarded me.
#1479
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:49 PM
Korlat, on Dec 10 2008, 10:42 AM, said:
@Mockra: you are claiming your victory conditions change with each guard? Well WTF? I never saw that, I was under the impression that you first guard of a roled player set your alignment, otherwise I reckon you are spouting BS and are just trying to keep yourself alive!
Nah, Mockra has claimed this since he revealed. But Emur doubted it and said the mechanic was probably a lie. Anyway, this sucks, as we may very well waste a lynch(possibly 2) on clarifying this. and that gives the killers 2 NKs to work with.
#1480
Posted 10 December 2008 - 03:51 PM
theres bound to be another guard, so two guards we lynch one personand guard two others, game will end soon enough with inno win.
i see three likely suspects for kilelr, rashan, korlat or tennes. now after last statement i bet tennes is guard so we guard rashan and korlat and then lynch one then the other. if game doesnt end its cause i am evil, lynch me game wins. screw it
i see three likely suspects for kilelr, rashan, korlat or tennes. now after last statement i bet tennes is guard so we guard rashan and korlat and then lynch one then the other. if game doesnt end its cause i am evil, lynch me game wins. screw it