[Tennes]

Actually, it looks quite odd to me. Why make a case and then rubbish it, if you're trying to get someone lynched, or think them shady enough to merit a case? All it does is make them look less shady, and more innocent. Look, heres all the stuff on Korlat, and actually, its not worth anything, so hes not worth going for. Its not at all an attacking case. It defends the person.
Really, all that case does, is defend Korlat, by convincing everyone that there is no case on him.
So it boils down to making Korlat look more innocent. So, unless that was your aim, why make it at all?

Unless of course, you are trying to appear more useful by making cases, while doing nothing of the sort?

This post has been edited by Tennes: 09 December 2008 - 02:35 PM

[Korlat]

Emurlahn, on Dec 9 2008, 04:26 PM, said:

Oki, my contributions are and will be severely limited today, so maybe I should not comment about this, but how the fuck can we, with 3 GB down, now already have a fucking train getting close to lynch? Are you guys insane? Where's the tactic and the need for discussion, questioning and examination? It seems we're all headless chicken here. Just fucking peachy.

It's exactly what the scum will want: little discussion, a fast lynch, and at the end of it, inno's pointing at one another on how they were goaded into a fast lynch, every single one forgetting they too added a vote in the early stages of the day.

Seriously, I'm disappointed that, with scum seemingly ahead of the game, we're going for a fast lynch.

Emur out again.

Emur? WTF?
Best time to put pressure on someone is early in the day. But to assume this will be a speed lynch, sounds rather panicky to me.

Edit: crosspost

This post has been edited by Korlat: 09 December 2008 - 02:38 PM

[Korlat]

Tennes, on Dec 9 2008, 04:34 PM, said:

Actually, it looks quite odd to me. Why make a case and then rubbish it, if you're trying to get someone lynched, or think them shady enough to merit a case? All it does is make them look less shady, and more innocent. Look, heres all the stuff on Korlat, and actually, its not worth anything, so hes not worth going for. Its not at all an attacking case. It defends the person.
Really, all that case does, is defend Korlat, by convincing everyone that there is no case on him.
So it boils down to making Korlat look more innocent. So, unless that was your aim, why make it at all?

Unless of course, you are trying to appear more useful by making cases, while doing nothing of the sort?

Simple I think, it makes it look like he is symping me, or at least that's the conclusion I arrive at after reading your analysis.

[Mockra]

Tennes, on Dec 9 2008, 02:22 PM, said:

I think he's reasoning that we would be given the CF Zuul, was she already possessed, and if she wasnt possessed at that point, she was a goodie, thus making Mockra evil.

i have said this a few times on thread, people are ignoring it, but the fact is i can be good or evil and change each night if successfuly. I dint guard anyone last night so recieved nothing from pathshaper, but i didnt after guarding gamelon either, so i wouldnt expect anything tomorrow either if i guard rashan. If there is a solo killer left i may be a great benefit to the inno's as i will be able to guard people, but if we dont hit evil soon i expect a lynch with no other reaosn thatn its risky to leave me alive numbers wise.

One thing you should all try and figure out htough, is how are you going to lynch a ghost?

[D'riss]

From what I get, that was a case about Korlat being the keymaster, sending all kinds of "possession" subliminal messages to his recruiting bad guy master. It does not warrant a vote, indeed, even if it's true.

[Kessobahn]

My view of todays posts thus far. Kas gets into trouble. Symp Rash tries to swing the vote away. Partner Emur calls us all idiots for not discussing the lynch so that maybe we are talked out of it and into lynching someone else. Of course, I am biased against Emur. So it probably doesn't mean anything. lol.

[D'riss]

Kessobahn, on Dec 9 2008, 04:51 PM, said:

Of course, I am biased against Emur.

You don't say

[Omtose]

I would like to have us look at all the guys who are attempting to sow doubt on the proven RI's.
As far as the Confirmed RI's are concerned we know each other to be CI...and the rest of the inno's should consider us VPI.

You have Tennes, rashan, ruse all trying to discredit us....why?

[Omtose]

Shadow too

[Tennes]

Why are you trying to CI all of you, would perhaps be a better question?

What a good idea for innos, lets just believe anyone saying they're RI, with a name that others have used already, as CI.
What a good plan.
The scum would NEVER manage to pick up on said name, so lets just hope that they didnt, and CI all of the ones putting there hands in the air and shouting CI me pl0x.

[Tennes]

Omtose, on Dec 9 2008, 02:56 PM, said:

...proven RI's.
...and the rest of the inno's should consider us VPI.

Its things like this, that really make me distrust people claiming stuff like that.

[Rashan]

Korlat, on Dec 9 2008, 03:28 PM, said:

And Rash how do we know he is Evil? How do we know that Dana was not in fact neutral or evil? Simple we don't.

I answered that question in post 1176.

Omtose, on Dec 9 2008, 03:56 PM, said:

I would like to have us look at all the guys who are attempting to sow doubt on the proven RI's.
As far as the Confirmed RI's are concerned we know each other to be CI...and the rest of the inno's should consider us VPI.

You have Tennes, rashan, ruse all trying to discredit us....why?

Wait, having a different opinion means discrediting? LOLWUT! Are you for real?

[Tennes]

And could you also tell me why you all decided it was such A FUCKING CLEVER IDEA to reveal who the RI were. Well fucking done you. Lets just let the scum know who all the RI are. Its a fucking team game. The scum knowing who RI are, just means they're gonna avoid them, and kill off all the roled ones. Great plan. Well done, it means that all the RI survive, instead of roled players. Of course, this being a team game, I can tell you for free, I'd prefer RI to die than everyone else, so why are you all revealing, and trying so hard to avoid death?!

[Hood's Path]

some people might feel we're moving to fast forwards, but I'm getting more confident of my Gamelon/Kaschan/Rashan theory by the hour and see no reason to postpone the lynch. Emur is free to complain as he wishes, but when he himself does not present other avenues of discussion then it gets somewhat ridiculous I think.

But yes, we're never harmed from more discussion, but at this point I think we need the result of Kaschan's cf to move on.. If Kaschan turns up guilty and Mockra guards Rashan I think we've won.

[Rashan]

What Tennes said. ^^^

[Kessobahn]

Tennes, on Dec 9 2008, 10:04 AM, said:

And could you also tell me why you all decided it was such A FUCKING CLEVER IDEA to reveal who the RI were. Well fucking done you. Lets just let the scum know who all the RI are. Its a fucking team game. The scum knowing who RI are, just means they're gonna avoid them, and kill off all the roled ones. Great plan. Well done, it means that all the RI survive, instead of roled players. Of course, this being a team game, I can tell you for free, I'd prefer RI to die than everyone else, so why are you all revealing, and trying so hard to avoid death?!

A. Not everyone who is Roleless has come forward, only about 3 really. So did it really hurt as bad as it seems? Maybe, we'll find out, no use in moaning after the fact. And Emur was the reason I proved i was RI. He was after all the one who kept saying I was a symp, so I had to come forward to move the game off of me. Why so angry, Roleless innos are usually the majority of team inno. Assuming 4 GB's and 3 bad guys, 3 GB's gone, maybe 2 roled innos other than those, thats 6 of a possible 13 players leaving a 7 player majority of RI. we only have to worry about 3 of the 13. and with only 3 RI's proving RI the killers have to pick that 3 out of 7 people. They are bound to miss eventually. Luckiest killers ever to hit 2 GB's in 2 nights.

I may be wrong here, but its not do or die yet, so stop getting so upset.

[Kessobahn]

Hi, PS. I am sober! Also I am working. And bored again, lol, lets see if I can hit 500 posts this game shall we? Kidding!

[Omtose]

Tennes, on Dec 9 2008, 10:00 AM, said:

Why are you trying to CI all of you, would perhaps be a better question?

What a good idea for innos, lets just believe anyone saying they're RI, with a name that others have used already, as CI.
What a good plan.
The scum would NEVER manage to pick up on said name, so lets just hope that they didnt, and CI all of the ones putting there hands in the air and shouting CI me pl0x.

please tennes dont be foolish

There is no way anybody would know what our name is...people have proven that they do know...without it being revealed.
If that is not enpugh for you then i can only assume you want to make us seem less credible to further your own needs

I am deliighted to know at least 3 CI's ...wonder why you arent?...hmmm?

[Omtose]

another thing?
Why am i trying to CI people?

What the fuck?

Thats half of the game...to sort out the Innosents from the scum. The other half is convincing everyone of it.
YOU are not helping this second half.

THINK...FFS...the more CI's we have the better our odds are of catching scum.
Fukcing hell

[Tennes]

Why so angry?

Because we could well need the GBs, and now there's ONE left.
Because the suspect pool has been narrowed down a lot for the scum. 3 out of 10 is definetely preferable to 3 out of 7 to choose from.
Counting on them missing is ridiculous. Always play worst case scenario.
Not only that, but now im being asked to think of people as CI, or at least VPI, on the basis that they've "proven" themselves RI. RI cannot be proved, definitively. Perhaps the first one, if there a code or whatever, but after that, the killers could pick it up.
Also, isnt it just awesome how we've got 3 scum(you're guess) and 3 people claiming RI? I know, lets go ahead and CI them....