[Rashan]

And we would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for you meddling Liosans!

This post has been edited by Rashan: 24 November 2008 - 07:46 PM

[Liosan]

Editted from:

Fuck, hes on to us, what'll we do! I know, i'll joke about it!

[Shadow]

Spammers spam spam! C'mon Lio, do you really think I'm scummy? tell you what, you remove your vote and I'll remove mine.

[Liosan]

Actually, im fairly ok with someone voting silanah.
Agressive play is agressive is a good excuse to hide behind, later on, after pushing lynch trains etc.
Also makes people think "hes always like this when inno".
If people know how people think they play inno, its easy enough to play like that deliberately, and people will trust you, based on meta.
I hate meta.

This post has been edited by Liosan: 24 November 2008 - 07:55 PM

[Kessobahn]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 04:41 PM, said:

Silanah, on Nov 24 2008, 03:39 PM, said:

If you cant alt guess me, your not trying very hard.

And no, you said you were his symp, I just said he was a symp. I didnt mention you, you interceded and defended him. Not hard being aggressive when someone; as you put it, "Pretends to be a symp so the killers don't discover their symp." Bit of a hazardous technique considering we are trying to find the scummy players and one is intentionally playing scummy to distract the killers as per a plan you have worked out on thread. Oh wait thats right, i am not actually allowed to make a case on what people say, i have to dick about first and go on gut or wait until someone says something obvious and makes themselves a good target for a day 1 lynch. Like saying they are a symp perhaps?

It's also an even more hazardous tactic for team killer to spam and pretend to be a symp, you realise. Credit me with a little intelligence. If I was genuinely scum I wouldn't be playing like this.

I don't like this post. Scum have played successfully in just about every style imaginable.

[Kessobahn]

Tennes, on Nov 24 2008, 04:46 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 03:40 PM, said:

6 people viewing. 5 people playing. Me, Rash,Sil,Kas,adMandy. Come out lurker, lets have a look at you.

*Does a twirl*






To Shadow and Rashan,

The spamming has put some votes on your heads already. If you're inno, any chance you could stop acting so suspicious so we actually have a chance of finding the symp(s) and killer(s)?



Your cooperation would be much appreciated.



Sincerely yours,

Tennes

Anyone else read this as "Shut up you idiot(s), you're going to get yourselves caught."?

[Liosan]

Often because they convince everyone else: Scum would never play like this.

[Kessobahn]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 05:01 PM, said:

Silanah, on Nov 24 2008, 10:53 AM, said:

@shadow - Happier? The fact was when i started people were complaining that i wasn't aggressive enough, now when something happens that i find suspicious because i act on it i am too aggressive. Well we cant please everyone.

Agression isn't bad, but at the first opportunity, you jumped. no, you pounced. And then you kept pushing. It looks like you wanted a quick lynch. The only ones that usually do that so early in the game are usually scum. And you don't have to please me, but you can at least ease up and let Rashan or I dig our own hole, instead you choose to grab a shovel and help us dig. Seems scummy. I hate to be linked so closely with anyone so early day1, but I think the arguement of kill the spammers is as weak as it gets. Its day one, theres always spam early day one. Its been noted and now corrected. At least I have. And I think Rash has as well. Yet we still have 2 votes each. THAT is fishy.

I find the accusation of wanting a quicklynch here to be a horrible misrepresentation.

[Kessobahn]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 05:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on Nov 24 2008, 07:06 AM, said:

LOL at Shadow. You're asking for it aren't you?


remove vote, vote Shadow

This was never removed, and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

I never remove my votes unless there is a believable claim or somewhere better to put them. Anyone think Shadow seems worried by a whole 2 votes.

[Shadow]

Kess is on post 176, I just learned that the little arrow beside the quote tag (QUOTE (Silanah @ Nov 24 2008, 10:53 AM) takes you to that post! kewl. I learned french and how to do something.

[Kessobahn]

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

If you have a case, putting the vote in before the case (the merits of which I will jufge when I get to it) makes you look desperate to have someone else's name on the list of people voted for.

[Shadow]

Kessobahn, on Nov 24 2008, 02:58 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 05:07 PM, said:

Kessobahn, on Nov 24 2008, 07:06 AM, said:

LOL at Shadow. You're asking for it aren't you?


remove vote, vote Shadow

This was never removed, and Mandy has a vote on me "to get the game moving". Anyone else think this is a bad thing? 2 joke votes left on. hmmmmm.

I never remove my votes unless there is a believable claim or somewhere better to put them. Anyone think Shadow seems worried by a whole 2 votes.

For when you get here -

The hmmm gave me away huh? Yup, really concerned. keep reading. Rash, still want to take that bet?

[Liosan]

Not really, joke votes have a strange way of piling up, attracting other votes, and then, after an inno lynch, people coming back and saying "but it was just a joke".
Therefore:

If you're going to keep your vote there, explain it, with a good reason, just because I think that "it was just a joke" is an excuse no one should have.

[Rashan]

Haha no, I'm good actually Shadow. I don't want to lose my hard-earned cash

[Shadow]

Kessobahn, on Nov 24 2008, 03:01 PM, said:

Shadow, on Nov 24 2008, 05:22 PM, said:

Vote Silanah

case coming next

If you have a case, putting the vote in before the case (the merits of which I will jufge when I get to it) makes you look desperate to have someone else's name on the list of people voted for.

Again for when you get here -

I said Sil was at the top of my list, next post is the case, if I wanted to re-direct attention I would have voted for Rashan, for symping me. I didn't because I think Sil is scummy. I am answering you as you go, because I don't want to miss a point and be accused of ignoring anything.

[Liosan]

Lol at Rashan.
Obvious alt is obvious, and has been for ages

[Rashan]

Liosan, on Nov 24 2008, 08:05 PM, said:

Lol at Rashan.
Obvious alt is obvious, and has been for ages

Obvious alt couldn't be more obvious. I gave up all pretences of hiding my secret super-hero identity quite a while ago.

That's right.

I'm mocker.

[Shadow]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 03:07 PM, said:

Liosan, on Nov 24 2008, 08:05 PM, said:

Lol at Rashan.
Obvious alt is obvious, and has been for ages

Obvious alt couldn't be more obvious. I gave up all pretences of hiding my secret super-hero identity quite a while ago.

That's right.

I'm mocker.

Ha! I knew it!

[Liosan]

Are you calling me obvious?

[Kessobahn]

Rashan, on Nov 24 2008, 05:49 PM, said:

Quote

- stuff that went awy cos it would make the post too big -

Well, lynch me then, dear boy, and let's see who's under suspicion when my CF appears. See, I happen to know I barely had any content in my posts except for accusing you of distancing. There was no content to post!
I'm defending Shadow because I don't think he's scum.
Spam is not a valid day one lynch. Should we revisit the game where every post had to be a vote? Serious business, this internets.

While Rashan does have a genuine point that he was an infinitely better target for an anti-spam vote tha Shadow, I dislike the "lynch me" challenge. In a situation with no reveals involved I feel its much more likely to be scum bravado than anything else.