T'lan Imass are so overpowered.
#81
Posted 19 February 2009 - 06:55 AM
After, I'm thinking, Raest would have been insanely strong if he got it.
#82
Posted 19 February 2009 - 11:45 AM
Good call on the quote Apt, I had forgotten that Rake wasn't sure he could beat Raest. My bad.
One question, Tool says that if Raest managed to enslave a Bonecastor, it would be so much worse.
That they would challange the gods and kill most of them. Why? Would a bonecaster's power add so much to Raest?
Raest if he got to his finnest would not need the Bonecaster I think.
Still Raest's magical powers were probably among the best we have seen in the series.
The fight would probably have been Raest pummeling Rake from far away while Rake trys to shields himself so that he can get close enoughto use Dragnipur. Without Dragnipur, Rake may be a goner.
Probably the only person who could then survive Raest's full power and keep going would be Icarium.
One question, Tool says that if Raest managed to enslave a Bonecastor, it would be so much worse.
That they would challange the gods and kill most of them. Why? Would a bonecaster's power add so much to Raest?
Raest if he got to his finnest would not need the Bonecaster I think.
Still Raest's magical powers were probably among the best we have seen in the series.
The fight would probably have been Raest pummeling Rake from far away while Rake trys to shields himself so that he can get close enoughto use Dragnipur. Without Dragnipur, Rake may be a goner.
Probably the only person who could then survive Raest's full power and keep going would be Icarium.
#83
Posted 19 February 2009 - 12:45 PM
I can't see how rake would know Raest didn't have his finnest though, so I lean towards with.
I mean, if thats a fraction of his power, and it equals Rakes, and he's not the only Jaghut of that power, it makes them ridiculously overpowered.
I don't think theres any evidence either way though, so i'd assume with, since Rake wouldn't know otherwise.
I mean, if thats a fraction of his power, and it equals Rakes, and he's not the only Jaghut of that power, it makes them ridiculously overpowered.
I don't think theres any evidence either way though, so i'd assume with, since Rake wouldn't know otherwise.
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#84
Posted 19 February 2009 - 12:47 PM
I'd disagree there. Pretty sure Gothos mentions he stops icarium.
Icarium, he's not that magically resistant. Some yes, but not that much.
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I reckon magically it'd be close, and a battle i'd like to see, simply cause they're magically two of the most evenly matched we know about, I reckon.
Icarium, he's not that magically resistant. Some yes, but not that much.
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I reckon magically it'd be close, and a battle i'd like to see, simply cause they're magically two of the most evenly matched we know about, I reckon.
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#85
Posted 19 February 2009 - 01:21 PM
Grief, on Feb 19 2009, 12:47 PM, said:
I'd disagree there. Pretty sure Gothos mentions he stops icarium.
Icarium, he's not that magically resistant. Some yes, but not that much.
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I reckon magically it'd be close, and a battle i'd like to see, simply cause they're magically two of the most evenly matched we know about, I reckon.
Icarium, he's not that magically resistant. Some yes, but not that much.
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I reckon magically it'd be close, and a battle i'd like to see, simply cause they're magically two of the most evenly matched we know about, I reckon.
Spoiler
Where does Gothos mention that he stopped Icarium? I don't remember that and I have recently reread DG. (Although I had forgotten the Rake quote too)
#86
Posted 19 February 2009 - 01:58 PM
Can't recall where its mentioned. Think its implied somewhere though.
Spoiler
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#87
Posted 19 February 2009 - 02:42 PM
Quote
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I believe it meant that if Raest overpowered a Bonecaster,he would have had complete access and control over Tellann and all T'lann Imass. And that wouldn't have been a nice thing.
Adept of Team Quick Ben
I greet you as guests and so will not crush the life from you and devour your soul with peals of laughter. No, instead, I will make tea-Gothos
I greet you as guests and so will not crush the life from you and devour your soul with peals of laughter. No, instead, I will make tea-Gothos
#89
Posted 19 February 2009 - 05:09 PM
Grief, on Feb 19 2009, 07:47 AM, said:
I think the bonecaster bit could be Gotmism, cause there must've been bonecasters at the time, so why hadn't it occured to him before?
I think Bauchelain is right. When Raest was in his fullest power the Tlann Imass Bonecasters had the Beast Hold as the heart of their power, I suspect Raest was fairly busy fighting off gadzooks of Imass and other Jaghut when the Ritual was called and so he didn't have much of an opportunity to take over a T'lan Imass Bonecaster before being beaten.
#90
Posted 19 February 2009 - 07:48 PM
Tbh, im not sure the bonecaster is massively important.
From what we've seen.
From what we've seen.
Spoiler
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).
#91
Posted 19 February 2009 - 08:49 PM
The bit about Raest being able to somehow enslave the Imass was actually an essential part of the plot. It is why Tool is used to help the Malazan. Since he is clanless he is not connected with any of the armies nearby and therefore, if he fails, he doesn't risk the rest of the Imass' safety.
It don't think it was implied that the whole warren of Tellan or all the Imass were in trouble if Raest got a Bonecaster, just the clan. For example if he got one from the Logros T'lan Imass, then they would fall to him, but the rest would still be free to move against him.
It don't think it was implied that the whole warren of Tellan or all the Imass were in trouble if Raest got a Bonecaster, just the clan. For example if he got one from the Logros T'lan Imass, then they would fall to him, but the rest would still be free to move against him.
#92
Posted 19 February 2009 - 09:14 PM
I guess once he had a Bonecaster he could instantly bend the entire clan to his will. Without, he could do that anyway, but he'd have to do it one at a time. And I suppose a small army of T'lan Imass working for him would be scary enough...
though since the term 'clan' is used so unspecifically with the Imass, we don't really know if enslaving a Bonecaster would link him to just the Bonecaster's clan (ie the Tarad clan) or to an entire Imass 'army' (ie the Logros T'lan Imass or the Kron, etc. These are sometimes also called 'clans' and they shouldn't be)...
though since the term 'clan' is used so unspecifically with the Imass, we don't really know if enslaving a Bonecaster would link him to just the Bonecaster's clan (ie the Tarad clan) or to an entire Imass 'army' (ie the Logros T'lan Imass or the Kron, etc. These are sometimes also called 'clans' and they shouldn't be)...
#93
Posted 20 February 2009 - 01:16 PM
As to the Imass do we have any idea what ottateral does to them? or the binding magic of the ritual?
TTFN
TTFN
Imagine a world without such souls.
Yes, it should have been harder to do.
Yes, it should have been harder to do.
#94
Posted 03 March 2009 - 12:17 AM
I have one problem with Rake saying he is uncertain about his ability to defeat Raest. When he and Baruk are talking about the Malazans freeing a Jaghut Tyrant Rake doesn't know which one does he? It would seem unlikely to me, and I was under the impression that Rake thought any Tyrant would be a challenge for him. It was also my impression that Raest wasn't just any Tyrant. For starters he was imprisoned by other Jaghut, not T'lan Imass. Also, after opening the barrow Tool sees Raest's name or something and tells Lorn that he recognizes this Tyrant and he no longer thinks they should free him (don't have the book at school w/me so I can't give an exact quote). I'm not saying that this decides anything, but nobody had brought it up so I figured I would.
So, you're the historian who survived the Chain of Dogs.
Actually, I didn't.
It seems you stand alone.
It was ever thus.
Actually, I didn't.
It seems you stand alone.
It was ever thus.
#95
Posted 03 March 2009 - 07:28 PM
Rake knows which tyrant is imprisoned nearby, since he is aware of the myth, and very knowledgeable on such matters.
Cougar said:
Grief, FFS will you do something with your sig, it's bloody awful
worry said:
Grief is right (until we abolish capitalism).

Help















