QuickTidal, on 22 November 2016 - 03:20 PM, said:
death rattle, on 22 November 2016 - 01:48 AM, said:
As a non-American, can you help me understand that? Like as far as I knew you could disperse protestors with non-lethal means....but to me blasting water into protestors in freezing temps seems like a pretty fast way to get people killed by hypothermia and such, no?
How did that get the go-ahead, and how is it being allowed at all?
It got the go ahead because in an oligarchy, what's "legal" is what your corporate masters say is legal. I'm not saying the country is 100% an oligarchy, just that on the ground here the behaviors certainly resemble one at a localized level -- it remains to be seen how accountability plays out as it rubs against other American institutions, but there's a very long history of Natives getting the short end of that stick too. There's calls for federal investigation, obviously, but I don't know if that'll come to anything. We'll see.
Nom is right, and that woman may lose the arm all together. And the sheriff's department involved is denying everything, from water cannons to dispersal explosives, despite all the evidence. Here's a good (if long -- the first half will give you the gist well enough) article on that night: http://thefreethough...-protector-arm/
I suppose you can call it biased -- it clearly has a perspective sympathetic to the NoDAPL side -- but I fail to see how a so-called "neutral" news source that claims this was a "clash between protestors and police" could be said to have any credibility at this point.