[Revenant]

D'rek, on Jun 18 2009, 12:22 PM, said:

Revenant, on Jun 17 2009, 10:57 AM, said:

D'rek, on Jun 17 2009, 07:37 AM, said:

Abyss, on Jun 17 2009, 09:33 AM, said:

And i could be wrong, but i don't think it actually says Stud led the revenants, only that he was a member.

I don't think it even says that... besides he's too young. And there's mention of only 1 Seguleh leading the Revenants, not 3 and what about that collapsing mountain? None of this adds up at all!

Gotta agree with you D'rek. Nothing adds up at all.
The reason I think the second led the revenants, is that the only mention of other Seguleh in the battle within Dragnipur, is of the Seguleh that fell to Rake.
If he is the Revenant commander though, why is there no mention of the revenants in the Dragnipur battle?

Because the Revenants are in another castle magic sword battle! I agree with you here, the human members of the Revenants aren't even mentioned so stands to reason that they and their renegade Seguleh commander have already been used elsewhere or just aren't there and therefore the Seg2nd being there means he is not their commander.

The only way I think could be justified for Seg2nd being the Revenants commander beyond that would be if he was sent by Hood to command the Revenants after he died and was already a servant of Hood before that...

Hopefully we will find out soon.
This is all too confusing

[DragonMaster]

I hope bumping really old threads isn't a big no-no. I have a theory about Studlock ...

MODGOD NOTICE OF POST EDIT TO REMOVE INFORMATION FROM LATER BOOK.
COOL THEORY BUT IT BELONGS IN A LATER BOOK FORUM.
PLEASE REPOST IT THERE.

This post has been edited by Abyss: 10 August 2012 - 02:33 PM

[worry]

You should post this in the forum that corresponds to the latest book you reference, otherwise it is definitely a spoiler and should be marked and hidden. Or put it in the General Book Topics forum.

[Abyss]

DragonMaster, on 10 August 2012 - 02:05 AM, said:

I hope bumping really old threads isn't a big no-no. I have a theory about Studlock ...

MODGOD NOTICE OF POST EDIT TO REMOVE INFORMATION FROM LATER BOOK.
COOL THEORY BUT IT BELONGS IN A LATER BOOK FORUM.
PLEASE REPOST IT THERE.

worrywort, on 10 August 2012 - 03:27 AM, said:

You should post this in the forum that corresponds to the latest book you reference, otherwise it is definitely a spoiler and should be marked and hidden. Or put it in the General Book Topics forum.

Agreed and to reiterate: it's a neat idea DM and you should totally raise it in the appropriate forum.