The Climate Change News Thread
#201
Posted 02 June 2008 - 01:08 AM
@ Terez, even if we really are 5 years away from commercial scale production (5 years in any new technology usually means "we don't know when, not soon", wait until you get calls of "this year" (which means probably sometime in the next 5-10 years) until you get excited), there is little hope of producing anything like the quantities that will make any sizable impact on the market.
@paladin, you either change now, or you change later, but the reality is you need to change. you built your society on cheap oil? great, now change your society to adapt to expensive oil, or watch out because pretty soon there'll be no oil.
What's the worst thing we can do? Subsidise it and allow our unsustainable way of life to continue. I'm from Australia, we have the same problem, mate, but this isn't a war, we can't just drop a bomb on this one.
@paladin, you either change now, or you change later, but the reality is you need to change. you built your society on cheap oil? great, now change your society to adapt to expensive oil, or watch out because pretty soon there'll be no oil.
What's the worst thing we can do? Subsidise it and allow our unsustainable way of life to continue. I'm from Australia, we have the same problem, mate, but this isn't a war, we can't just drop a bomb on this one.
#202
Posted 02 June 2008 - 01:21 AM
CI said:
@ Terez, even if we really are 5 years away from commercial scale production (5 years in any new technology usually means "we don't know when, not soon", wait until you get calls of "this year" (which means probably sometime in the next 5-10 years) until you get excited), there is little hope of producing anything like the quantities that will make any sizable impact on the market.
Do you mean in 5 years, or ever? From what I understand, it's probable that they will be able to produce enough to support the US eventually, and there's relatively little problem concerning infrastructure change. I'm excited even if it's a small win - like I said, this might (hopefully) be the first of many such innovations. But with people still out there that think ethanol is the solution, this one looks good.

The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#203
Posted 02 June 2008 - 03:00 AM
Terez;320565 said:
Do you mean in 5 years, or ever? From what I understand, it's probable that they will be able to produce enough to support the US eventually, and there's relatively little problem concerning infrastructure change. I'm excited even if it's a small win - like I said, this might (hopefully) be the first of many such innovations. But with people still out there that think ethanol is the solution, this one looks good. 

Infastructure change is not the issue, reliable production is. It's worth investment, but I'd be surprised if we ever saw anything like the current oil usage coming from it.
#204
Posted 02 June 2008 - 03:34 AM
I would too, if for no other reason than that these guys will be milking their patents as much as possible, so it's inevitable that other solutions will come from other areas, creating a competition that would make such high production unnecessary. At least, that's the scenario I'm hoping for.

The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#205
Posted 02 June 2008 - 03:40 AM
And I'm hoping nudism becomes the next craze to sweep the whole world's population of 16-30 year old girls
#206
Posted 02 June 2008 - 03:42 AM
That pessimistic, huh?

The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#208
Posted 02 June 2008 - 04:21 AM
This is more related to the energy crisis, but it technically ties into climate change as well.
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/01/ha...wer-from-space/
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/01/ha...wer-from-space/
#209
Posted 02 June 2008 - 04:38 AM
Problem (cos you knew I'd find one):
Quote
The energy collected by highly efficient solar panels could be beamed down to Earth (although it is not clear from the source what technology will go into "beaming" energy to Earth) where it is fed into the national grid of the country maintaining the system.
#210
Posted 03 June 2008 - 01:36 AM
#211
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:11 AM
For everyone who wants longer datasamples:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/06/05/l...al-warming.html
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/06/05/l...al-warming.html
#212
Posted 07 June 2008 - 05:28 AM
#213
Posted 07 June 2008 - 05:33 AM
Worth a shot, one way or the other. Though not doubt some funds will be misappropriated along the way...
The President (2012) said:
Please proceed, Governor.
Chris Christie (2016) said:
There it is.
Elizabeth Warren (2020) said:
And no, I’m not talking about Donald Trump. I’m talking about Mayor Bloomberg.
#214
Posted 07 June 2008 - 05:41 AM
Has anyone posted about the latest plans for CO2 scrubbing yet?
O xein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti têde; keimetha tois keinon rhémasi peithomenoi.
#215
Posted 12 June 2008 - 06:55 AM
Tree Leaves Keep Inner Temp Steady
@brood, no, and since we don't really have anywhere to put all the emitted CO2, it's not really a feasible technology
Quote
For decades, scientists studying the impact of global warming have measured the oxygen isotope ratio in tree rings to determine the air temperature and relative humidity of historical climates.
Oxygen atoms within water molecules evaporate more or less quickly depending on the number of neutrons they carry, and the ratio between these differently weighted atoms in tree trunk rings has been used as a measure of year-to-year fluctuations in temperatures and rainfall.
"The assumption in all of these studies was that tree leaf temperatures were equal to ambient temperatures," lead researcher Brent Helliker said. "It turns out that they are not."
Oxygen atoms within water molecules evaporate more or less quickly depending on the number of neutrons they carry, and the ratio between these differently weighted atoms in tree trunk rings has been used as a measure of year-to-year fluctuations in temperatures and rainfall.
"The assumption in all of these studies was that tree leaf temperatures were equal to ambient temperatures," lead researcher Brent Helliker said. "It turns out that they are not."
@brood, no, and since we don't really have anywhere to put all the emitted CO2, it's not really a feasible technology

#216
Posted 17 June 2008 - 03:50 PM
Cold Iron;328378 said:
Tree Leaves Keep Inner Temp Steady
@brood, no, and since we don't really have anywhere to put all the emitted CO2, it's not really a feasible technology
@brood, no, and since we don't really have anywhere to put all the emitted CO2, it's not really a feasible technology

Send it into space...wait, that's my answer for everything.
QUOTE (Stalker @ Jan 23 2009, 01:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
So last night I was walking downtown for some pizza at like 1am with some friends of mine,
and someone said, "I'm so hungry I could eat a whole pizza."
I said, "I bet I could eat 100 pizzas," and no one understood me. I was sad.
and someone said, "I'm so hungry I could eat a whole pizza."
I said, "I bet I could eat 100 pizzas," and no one understood me. I was sad.
#217
Posted 20 June 2008 - 01:30 AM
#218
Posted 23 June 2008 - 03:55 AM
Xander;334557 said:
Are you sure you linked the right story there buddy?
#219
Posted 23 June 2008 - 04:02 AM
http://dsc.discovery...an-warming.html
Interesting, that story wasn't even posted on the site the day I linked...hmm...weird.
CI, back from the dead!
Interesting, that story wasn't even posted on the site the day I linked...hmm...weird.
CI, back from the dead!

#220
Posted 23 June 2008 - 04:30 AM
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.