American Football
#1621
Posted 24 January 2011 - 06:38 PM
Any news yet on which local refs the STEALERS have selected to guarantee victory
What Would Jack Do ?
#1622
Posted 24 January 2011 - 10:43 PM
Slow Ben, on 24 January 2011 - 04:36 PM, said:
Fuck......
Well, lets go Steelers!
Well, lets go Steelers!
Breaking News! Cutler's being replaced!!!
Attached File(s)
-
Bears_New_Quarterback.jpg (119.4K)
Number of downloads: 0
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#1623
Posted 24 January 2011 - 11:24 PM
Grumble, on 24 January 2011 - 06:38 PM, said:
Any news yet on which local refs the STEALERS have selected to guarantee victory
haha, I agree. I hated that "fumble" call.
But sadly, the Jets lost it for themselves with the awful first half performance. The defense could not make a stop and the offense was weak. I also hated the play-calling when the Jets had 4 downs from the 1 yard line. You have LT and Greene, just punch the ball in there. Wasting two downs with Sanchez throwing is terrible.
If there could be some way for both teams to lose the Super Bowl, I'd like that.
#1624
Posted 24 January 2011 - 11:55 PM
Stalker, on 24 January 2011 - 11:24 PM, said:
Grumble, on 24 January 2011 - 06:38 PM, said:
Any news yet on which local refs the STEALERS have selected to guarantee victory
haha, I agree. I hated that "fumble" call.
But sadly, the Jets lost it for themselves with the awful first half performance. The defense could not make a stop and the offense was weak. I also hated the play-calling when the Jets had 4 downs from the 1 yard line. You have LT and Greene, just punch the ball in there. Wasting two downs with Sanchez throwing is terrible.
If there could be some way for both teams to lose the Super Bowl, I'd like that.
It's called a "Meteor Game." In which one hopes the only winner is the meteor that crashes into the stadium as the two teams play.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#1626
Posted 26 January 2011 - 09:12 AM
I had forgotten how good it feels for my favorite team to make it to the superbowl. This is great. I think I heard the packers are favored by 3.5. Should be a great game. It's an interesting matchup, I don't get why so many people are disappointed that this is the superbowl.
Error: Signature not valid
#1627
Posted 26 January 2011 - 12:01 PM
I'm disappointed as far as the 49ers aren't in it but that was something I got over a few months back.
I think I am going to root for the Steelers purely based on the fact that the Packers are who they support in That 70s Show and I can't stand that TV program...


A Haunting Poem
I Scream
You Scream
We all Scream
For I Scream.
I Scream
You Scream
We all Scream
For I Scream.
#1629
#1630
Posted 26 January 2011 - 11:16 PM
Raymond Luxury Yacht, on 26 January 2011 - 09:12 AM, said:
I had forgotten how good it feels for my favorite team to make it to the superbowl. This is great. I think I heard the packers are favored by 3.5. Should be a great game. It's an interesting matchup, I don't get why so many people are disappointed that this is the superbowl.
Better than the Pats v. anybody.
I'd have rather two teams that hadn't won a SB be in it, like Atlanta v. Chiefs. But, I suppose I'll cheer for the Packers seeing as how I hate the Steelers only slightly less than the Pats and Chargers.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#1631
Posted 27 January 2011 - 02:23 AM
HoosierDaddy, on 26 January 2011 - 11:16 PM, said:
Better than the Pats v. anybody.
I'd have rather two teams that hadn't won a SB be in it, like Atlanta v. Chiefs. But, I suppose I'll cheer for the Packers seeing as how I hate the Steelers only slightly less than the Pats and Chargers.
Completely agree with this- when I don't have a rooting interest I really like seeing teams who have either never made it or never won it because I think it's cool for the city and fans to finally get to see their team in it with a chance to win it all.
In this case, I really like Mike Tomlinson as a coach but I can't root for Pittsburg and, outside of football I think Big Ben is complete piece of crap so I'll be pulling for the Packers in this one.
This post has been edited by MWKarsa: 27 January 2011 - 02:23 AM
#1632
Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:14 PM
I actually have sort of liked the steelers because they are such a storied franchise, but I don't really care about the AFC most of the time. I like the matchup because it's two old fashioned football clubs.
I find this to be a somewhat important Super Bowl for the Packers, since it would take us out of the shadow of the Favre incident.
The Chiefs don't exist btw. They are a figment of the NFL's imagination.
I find this to be a somewhat important Super Bowl for the Packers, since it would take us out of the shadow of the Favre incident.
The Chiefs don't exist btw. They are a figment of the NFL's imagination.
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#1633
Posted 27 January 2011 - 05:55 PM
Christian Okoye demands your respect!!!
I've always been crazy but its kept me from going insane.
#1634
Posted 27 January 2011 - 07:33 PM
#1635
Posted 27 January 2011 - 10:22 PM
Shinrei, on 27 January 2011 - 01:14 PM, said:
I actually have sort of liked the steelers because they are such a storied franchise, but I don't really care about the AFC most of the time. I like the matchup because it's two old fashioned football clubs.
I find this to be a somewhat important Super Bowl for the Packers, since it would take us out of the shadow of the Favre incident.
The Chiefs don't exist btw. They are a figment of the NFL's imagination.
I find this to be a somewhat important Super Bowl for the Packers, since it would take us out of the shadow of the Favre incident.
The Chiefs don't exist btw. They are a figment of the NFL's imagination.
Old Fashioned in what way? Certainly not by playing style. By franchise management style, I'd definitely yes though.
Trouble arrives when the opponents to such a system institute its extreme opposite, where individualism becomes godlike and sacrosanct, and no greater service to any other ideal (including community) is possible. In such a system rapacious greed thrives behind the guise of freedom, and the worst aspects of human nature come to the fore....
#1636
#1637
Posted 04 February 2011 - 07:54 PM
Fear the beard.
This post has been edited by Fartstad Stinkhammer: 04 February 2011 - 07:55 PM
#1638
Posted 06 February 2011 - 11:55 AM
GOPACKGO
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#1639
Posted 07 February 2011 - 05:54 AM
I believe that might be the best way to end a season of NFL football...
You’ve never heard of the Silanda? … It’s the ship that made the Warren of Telas run in less than 12 parsecs.
#1640
Posted 07 February 2011 - 03:05 PM
Well, at least it was a good game. And the Pack deserved to win.
Dammit.
Dammit.
I've always been crazy but its kept me from going insane.