Reading at t'moment?
#11061
Posted 18 July 2013 - 03:45 AM
Vince Flynn - The Last Man.
Can not be recommended in any way whatsoever. It is shite. However it is the last unread book in the house and I refuse to let this piece of juvenile, Lee Child wannabee, dull as fuck, turd-on-a-page nonsense beat me.
Can not be recommended in any way whatsoever. It is shite. However it is the last unread book in the house and I refuse to let this piece of juvenile, Lee Child wannabee, dull as fuck, turd-on-a-page nonsense beat me.
#11062
Posted 18 July 2013 - 05:04 AM
Abyss, on 17 July 2013 - 01:35 PM, said:
I can't read Hobb. I've tried, but something about her style just leaves me bored and annoyed within ten pages or less.
That's because you didn't read it as a teen. It appears that the people who like Hobb read it as a teenager and the people who don't, didn't. Doesn't that make them YA books?
Monster Hunter World Iceborne: It's like hunting monsters, but on crack, but the monsters are also on crack.
#11063
Posted 18 July 2013 - 05:31 AM
I read them in college or after (depending on release dates on Tawny Man for instance) and she's one of my faves in the biz. I don't think she's an acquired taste, necessarily, but I do think she has a dour sensibility that suits a narrower set of tastes. I don't mean narrow vs. broad, but rather a narrow section of the fantasy spectrum that your appetites either overlap or don't. For one thing, very little humor in any of her series, and certainly nothing that even approaches comic relief.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#11064
Posted 18 July 2013 - 05:33 AM
Oh and I started Perdido Street Station. I thought I was the only one with headlegs!
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#11065
Posted 18 July 2013 - 05:47 AM
Briar King, on 17 July 2013 - 11:19 AM, said:
My conclusion is only half formed, but certainly there is room for discussion if you're up for it lol. Some of the comments on here about Robin Hobb do interest me.... A lot of good fantasy authors mention liking Robin Hobb in interviews such as Brandon Sanderson, Patrick Rothfuss, Mark Lawrence, and Steven Erickson. I've been reading fantasy for a few years so don't really consider myself new to the genre, but I really like what I've read from her so far. The Farseer trilogy might not have a super complex plot and stylistically it's simple, but she is the best character writer I've seen. And the way she handled character relationships really blew me away in Liveship Traders. Both trilogies are two of the best!
speculativefictionatitsbest.blogspot.com
#11066
Posted 18 July 2013 - 07:04 AM
I think he just meant you read them in the wrong order (it goes Farseer, Liveship, Tawny Man, Rain Wilds).
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#11067
#11068
Posted 18 July 2013 - 01:53 PM
Finished JK Rowling's Detective/mystery THE CUCKOO'S CALLING.
Wonderful stuff. Easy prose, with a solid pace a likable protagonist and a great assistant character. Clever and keeps you guessing.
Nothing mind-blowing, but then her first HP book was only half decent and the series ramped up as it went.
I understand why people are praising it, in the glut of mysteries out there it stands above for the sheer charm. It doesn't try to be too dark, and yet doesn't shy away from the harder to look at stuff. Lots of comic relief, and a look at swanky London from the outside in. Think PD James without the gruesome bits. Very Alexander Mcaul-ish.
This could easily be the start of a new and very successful series for her. Both main characters (Detective Cormoran Strike and assistant Robin Elliacott) are defo series material. Lots of room for growth.
Good stuff.
Onto the next Iggulden Casar book DEATH OF KINGS next or maybe Anthony Ryan's BLOOD SONG.
Wonderful stuff. Easy prose, with a solid pace a likable protagonist and a great assistant character. Clever and keeps you guessing.
Nothing mind-blowing, but then her first HP book was only half decent and the series ramped up as it went.
I understand why people are praising it, in the glut of mysteries out there it stands above for the sheer charm. It doesn't try to be too dark, and yet doesn't shy away from the harder to look at stuff. Lots of comic relief, and a look at swanky London from the outside in. Think PD James without the gruesome bits. Very Alexander Mcaul-ish.
This could easily be the start of a new and very successful series for her. Both main characters (Detective Cormoran Strike and assistant Robin Elliacott) are defo series material. Lots of room for growth.
Good stuff.
Onto the next Iggulden Casar book DEATH OF KINGS next or maybe Anthony Ryan's BLOOD SONG.
This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 18 July 2013 - 01:56 PM
"When the last tree has fallen, and the rivers are poisoned, you cannot eat money, oh no." ~Aurora
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
"Someone will always try to sell you despair, just so they don't feel alone." ~Ursula Vernon
#11069
Posted 18 July 2013 - 03:21 PM
Finished The Thousand Names by Django Wexler. Below average, imo. Bland, flat characters, bland, flat battle scenes, plot twists that were predictable ages before they happened. Didn't like it at all.
#11070
Posted 18 July 2013 - 03:30 PM
Obdigore, on 18 July 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:
Abyss, on 17 July 2013 - 01:35 PM, said:
I can't read Hobb. I've tried, but something about her style just leaves me bored and annoyed within ten pages or less.
That's because you didn't read it as a teen. It appears that the people who like Hobb read it as a teenager and the people who don't, didn't. Doesn't that make them YA books?
The first (and currently only) Hobb I've read was Liveship Traders, at (heads to LibraryThing to look it up) 28 years old. Loved it. Her writing actually reminded me a lot of Donaldson; his GAP Cycle in particular. I found it to be pretty dense and mature stuff; wouldn't call it YA in a million years. Farseer could be a different animal, though; I haven't gotten around to that one yet.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#11071
Posted 18 July 2013 - 03:40 PM
Ex-Communication is awesome. Clines is tying threads back into the first two books, which is awesome; I need to pull those out and check how things match up.
Also got an email saying King of Thorns is ready to pick up at the library. Woot!
Also got an email saying King of Thorns is ready to pick up at the library. Woot!
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#11072
Posted 18 July 2013 - 03:57 PM
Salt-Man Z, on 18 July 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
Also got an email saying King of Thorns is ready to pick up at the library. Woot!
I thought that said Emperor for a second and was about to go into a jealous brain-stealing rage.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#11073
Posted 18 July 2013 - 05:03 PM
Salt-Man Z, on 18 July 2013 - 03:40 PM, said:
Ex-Communication is awesome. Clines is tying threads back into the first two books, which is awesome; I need to pull those out and check how things match up....
I've been doing it on the fly. Pretty impressive plot lines, tho the real strength is the characters.
THIS IS YOUR REMINDER THAT THERE IS A
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
'VIEW NEW CONTENT' BUTTON THAT
ALLOWS YOU TO VIEW NEW CONTENT
#11074
Posted 18 July 2013 - 09:38 PM
I'm reading this one obscure little title, Caine's Law?
It's already much better than Caine Black Knife but also makes that book more satisfying in context. It's like that's the plinth, and this is the statue.
It's already much better than Caine Black Knife but also makes that book more satisfying in context. It's like that's the plinth, and this is the statue.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#11075
Posted 18 July 2013 - 09:44 PM
Hinter, on 18 July 2013 - 03:45 AM, said:
Vince Flynn - The Last Man.
Can not be recommended in any way whatsoever. It is shite. However it is the last unread book in the house and I refuse to let this piece of juvenile, Lee Child wannabee, dull as fuck, turd-on-a-page nonsense beat me.
Can not be recommended in any way whatsoever. It is shite. However it is the last unread book in the house and I refuse to let this piece of juvenile, Lee Child wannabee, dull as fuck, turd-on-a-page nonsense beat me.
I completely agree. The conclusion is so obvious right from the first chapter, but yet they treat the terrorist attack like it's some mystery. Wait it happened this way...... no it happened that wait.... wait a minute..... it happened the way we originally thought. This kind of plotting is awful. I used to enjoy this type of garbage, but since discovering good authors such as Steven Erickson, Robin Hobb, Brandon Sanderson, and Paul Kearney not anymore.
speculativefictionatitsbest.blogspot.com
#11076
Posted 18 July 2013 - 09:48 PM
Briar King, on 18 July 2013 - 06:32 PM, said:
I apologize for the misunderstanding. I don't think there's anything wrong with reading Liveship Traders before Farseer. They're both set in different places and follow plot lines that are completely separate. There is some reference to Bingtown and the Rainwilds in Farseer, but I don't think reading them in a slightly skewed order hurt my enjoyment of either series. If someone read Tawney Man before Farseer I would agree with you because if I'm not mistake that series also follows Fitz.
speculativefictionatitsbest.blogspot.com
#11077
Posted 18 July 2013 - 10:01 PM
birthSqueeze, on 18 July 2013 - 09:48 PM, said:
They're both set in different places and follow plot lines that are completely separate.
A common misconception! But any explanation would necessarily include spoilers, so I'll avoid, except to say that Farseer/Liveship/Tawny Man actually tells one long story, chronologically. It does make me curious if flipping the first two trilogies winds up with the same basic effect....you are right that it's most vital that the Tawny Man trilogy comes third, regardless of how you go about the first two.
They came with white hands and left with red hands.
#11078
Posted 18 July 2013 - 10:06 PM
I barely remember half the books I read last year, so by the time I get around to Farseer, I should be fine.
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
#11079
Posted 18 July 2013 - 10:07 PM
I skipped straight from Farseer to Tawny and thought it was mostly brilliant (though both series suffer from massive chunks where they just travel for ages and nothing interesting happens along the way). Tried to read Liveship later on and didn't get very far at all.
Man I do wish people who profess to be fans would spell his name right.
Unless you actually mean Steve Erickson, in which case my apologies.
birthSqueeze, on 18 July 2013 - 09:44 PM, said:
Steven Erickson
Man I do wish people who profess to be fans would spell his name right.
Unless you actually mean Steve Erickson, in which case my apologies.
I can't carry it for you, but I can carry you.
#11080
Posted 18 July 2013 - 10:10 PM
Stephen Eriksen
"Here is light. You will say that it is not a living entity, but you miss the point that it is more, not less. Without occupying space, it fills the universe. It nourishes everything, yet itself feeds upon destruction. We claim to control it, but does it not perhaps cultivate us as a source of food? May it not be that all wood grows so that it can be set ablaze, and that men and women are born to kindle fires?"
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch
―Gene Wolfe, The Citadel of the Autarch