stone monkey, on 10 November 2010 - 09:54 PM, said:
amphibian, on 09 November 2010 - 03:45 PM, said:
In the past I've said that Quicksilver probably doesn't even work properly as a novel; ...
The thing keeping me away from the BAROQUE trilo is that it seems to be primarily three massive volumes of the things i liked least about CRYPTO'N.
Which is bothersome because i realy enjoyed SNOW CRASH, AGE and parts of CRYPTO. Having the same problem with ANATHEM tho i'm told it's substantially different for a Stephenson novel.
ansible, on 11 November 2010 - 08:06 PM, said:
...
I suspect it amounts to GotM being the intended intro to the world. I go back and forth on whether NoK makes for a better intro. It's hard to be onbective since i read it just prior to TBG and couldn't contemplate not knowing who the handful of characters from NoK were, even tho' their roles are beyond minor.
Salt-Man Z, on 11 November 2010 - 09:40 PM, said:
Have to agree with that. DG is a superior book and more likely to draw the fenced reader in.
Am presently halfway thru TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT and enjoying it immensely.
Post TOWERS i will probably just go back temporarily to Sterling's DISTRACTION since STONEWIELDER and SIDE JOBS are due to appear this month. DIST'N is a good enough book but easy to put aside and return to.