Macros, on 03 January 2025 - 07:09 PM, said:
surely you mean the only adaptation worth watching, the '95 series
no one of any kind of taste actually enjoyed the '05 fiasco
honestly, such peasants at times
no one of any kind of taste actually enjoyed the '05 fiasco
honestly, such peasants at times
So here’s the thing.
For accuracy, characters, and attention to regency and Austen detail, the 1995 miniseries is the ONLY one that matters, I agree. I agree so hard that I bought the high def bluray set for it so that I can watch and enjoy it anytime.
BUT
The 2005 film, though wildly anachronistic, completely miscast in some instances, with terrible scene choices and shot blocking…and score…has a near exquisite cinematography that looks often like oil paintings and is a sumptuous buffet of visual delight. And though Longbourn of the film looks NOTHING like what it should look like….something about it sings to me. And though most of the cast annoys me, both Donald Sutherland and Matthew Mcfaddyen excel at their roles.and Rosumund Pike sells Jane Bennet as the most gorgeous girl around more than Susannah Harker ever did.
So yes ‘95 is leaps and bounds better…but I can still find enjoyment in the 2005 film.
This post has been edited by QuickTidal: 04 January 2025 - 09:20 PM