ColtaineDidNothingWrong, on 25 December 2020 - 07:06 AM, said:
- Coltaine -, on 25 December 2020 - 06:50 AM, said:
If I remember correctly it was a One Ring situation. The sword also had to be destroyed where it was created. So sending Withal back was the only option.
Also we have already seen with Mael that the Crippled God is at a huge disadvantage in a physical confrontation ^^
Thanks! My question there though is why would Mael take Withal off the island if it's so easy to destroy the sword? Why not just have him wait on the island until the next time Rhulad dies and shows up? Then he can grab the sword while Rhulad is having his fit, and destroy it.
The Crippled God didn't seem able to stop Withal at the end of RG from destroying the sword, nor could he stop Mael in MT from coming onto his island and beating him up. It seems like a waste of time to just let Rhulad basically roam free and die/resurrect as many times as he wants, when all they really had to do is wait for his next resurrection, snatch the sword and break it, and then they're done.
Sorry, I guess I didn't read your question completely ^^. The Sword gets brought back into the realm of the Crippled God by Karsa, after he cut of Rhulads arm. When Rhulads soul comes to the island after being killed, he appears without the sword. So you need to have the sword on the island, Withal and someone who can prevent the Crippled God from interfering.
So the optimal thing for Mael to do would have been to help someone kill Rhulad, say Brys or Silchas, cut his swordhand of as you probably wouldn't get it out of his grip, take it to island and let Withal destroy it. Provided he would have known all the details
But SE having RG not fully planned out is probably the most logical explanation. Fits his way of writing. Like Tehol and Bugg being a spontaneous addition to Midnight Tides as an example.