Twilight Imperium VI: Revengeancest - Chat Thread
#481
Posted 12 November 2020 - 08:57 PM
Well, obviously I'm rather biased, but even still I think it is best that IH not be given an extra VP to get even further ahead. Tatts' notion of "oh he'll be pulled down later" {a} hasn't happened all that much in the past games, and {b} Saar can hide in asteroid fields with Chaos Mapping and be untouchable in the last few rounds, so that plan vs Saar isn't a good idea anyway.
And if I get +1'd on the first agenda, then it means all 4 of us can be the selected player for the planet agenda instead of just me, so that ups your chances of being chosen, too.
And if I get +1'd on the first agenda, then it means all 4 of us can be the selected player for the planet agenda instead of just me, so that ups your chances of being chosen, too.
#482
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:07 PM
I'm going to vote for Lazar then on the second agenda. 2 of you should vote against on first agenda and 1 vote Lazar on second.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#483
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:15 PM
I'm voting 12 against on SEED.
#484
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:23 PM
Anyone who votes for lazar will not get the planet and I will consider it an act of aggression
#485
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:30 PM
Blend if you agree to put all your votes for gral I will hand you the planet if it is selected.
#486
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:38 PM
Imperial Historian, on 12 November 2020 - 09:23 PM, said:
Anyone who votes for lazar will not get the planet and I will consider it an act of aggression
Like destroying my carrier and infantry?
Pick whatever inconveniences the leader the most? No infantry slows the Saar down. It's a no brainer.
You and Blend already have a deal for Gral.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#487
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:40 PM
This saves him a CT and gains him an infantry though
#488
Posted 12 November 2020 - 09:41 PM
Imperial Historian, on 12 November 2020 - 09:30 PM, said:
Blend if you agree to put all your votes for gral I will hand you the planet if it is selected.
I agree to this. I'll put all my votes on Gral.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#489
#490
Posted 13 November 2020 - 07:23 AM
I am lacking the votes of two players at this point. I do not consider posts in this thread to be official votes.
#491
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:22 AM
if we consider the agendas to happen simultaneously, then I suppose D'rek gains control of Gral by default. Any objections to that interpretation? Otherwise it would have been wrong to discard the previous agenda.
This post has been edited by Galactic Council: 13 November 2020 - 08:27 AM
#492
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:36 AM
The agendas resolve in order. D'rek therefore has 2 points when the other agenda is resolved.
#493
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:37 AM
And the other agenda would have been discarded regardless. I think everyone was voting on the above basis.
#494
#496
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:50 AM
I don't mind either way. If they happen in order Blend gains control of Gral.
#497
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:50 AM
From our house rules
Once all votes are submitted, the moderator tallies them and resolves the first agenda according to the winning outcome, then resolves the second agenda. Ties are decided by the Speaker, as per usual.
Once all votes are submitted, the moderator tallies them and resolves the first agenda according to the winning outcome, then resolves the second agenda. Ties are decided by the Speaker, as per usual.
#498
Posted 13 November 2020 - 08:56 AM
I should have put all my votes FOR, but I was sure twelve would have put at least 5 votes against
#499
#500
Posted 13 November 2020 - 10:46 AM
Tatts I wanted Tech.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.