Twilight Imperium VI: Revengeancest - Chat Thread
#341
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:12 PM
It is tempting to stall though and hang on to starpoint for another round.
#342
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:27 PM
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:08 PM, said:
2 actions, 1 action card I play warfare on turn 4, if I used pop to stall it would be turn 5.
Ah yes, total brainfart
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:12 PM, said:
It is tempting to stall though and hang on to starpoint for another round.
You've already exhausted it this round, probably I'll have an earlier SC than you next round and take it first turn, so the only benefit you'd get out of this would be 1 vote in this agenda phase. Really worth it?
#343
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:31 PM
IH - how would you feel about my coming in and taking Gral without you coming in behind and swiping Mehar Xull?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#344
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:33 PM
D, on 10 November 2020 - 06:27 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:08 PM, said:
2 actions, 1 action card I play warfare on turn 4, if I used pop to stall it would be turn 5.
Ah yes, total brainfart
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:12 PM, said:
It is tempting to stall though and hang on to starpoint for another round.
You've already exhausted it this round, probably I'll have an earlier SC than you next round and take it first turn, so the only benefit you'd get out of this would be 1 vote in this agenda phase. Really worth it?
I pick before you so I would likely be higher in initiative. And I don't think I'll do it, I'm just saying it's tempting!
#345
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:33 PM
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:33 PM, said:
D, on 10 November 2020 - 06:27 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:08 PM, said:
2 actions, 1 action card I play warfare on turn 4, if I used pop to stall it would be turn 5.
Ah yes, total brainfart
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:12 PM, said:
It is tempting to stall though and hang on to starpoint for another round.
You've already exhausted it this round, probably I'll have an earlier SC than you next round and take it first turn, so the only benefit you'd get out of this would be 1 vote in this agenda phase. Really worth it?
I pick before you so I would likely be higher in initiative. And I don't think I'll do it, I'm just saying it's tempting!
You're not gonna go for Imperial???
#346
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:42 PM
Blend, on 10 November 2020 - 06:31 PM, said:
IH - how would you feel about my coming in and taking Gral without you coming in behind and swiping Mehar Xull?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I thought we'd already agreed that I'd take centauri gral, and that we would work out a deal once I'd scored the PO for you to move in and use gral to score?
I'm not keen on this and I could see this resulting in conflict. The path of my nascent saar ball pretty much has to go through that system. I'm happy to work out a deal where I leave it empty so you can move in later and score that PO without losing my sftt.
#347
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:44 PM
D, on 10 November 2020 - 06:33 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:33 PM, said:
D, on 10 November 2020 - 06:27 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:08 PM, said:
2 actions, 1 action card I play warfare on turn 4, if I used pop to stall it would be turn 5.
Ah yes, total brainfart
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:12 PM, said:
It is tempting to stall though and hang on to starpoint for another round.
You've already exhausted it this round, probably I'll have an earlier SC than you next round and take it first turn, so the only benefit you'd get out of this would be 1 vote in this agenda phase. Really worth it?
I pick before you so I would likely be higher in initiative. And I don't think I'll do it, I'm just saying it's tempting!
You're not gonna go for Imperial???
1. I don't think it would get round to me
2. I don't want to encourage twelve to send a warsun my way
3. I likely wouldn't be able to take full advantage of it and score 2 POs
#348
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:46 PM
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:42 PM, said:
Blend, on 10 November 2020 - 06:31 PM, said:
IH - how would you feel about my coming in and taking Gral without you coming in behind and swiping Mehar Xull?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I thought we'd already agreed that I'd take centauri gral, and that we would work out a deal once I'd scored the PO for you to move in and use gral to score?
I'm not keen on this and I could see this resulting in conflict. The path of my nascent saar ball pretty much has to go through that system. I'm happy to work out a deal where I leave it empty so you can move in later and score that PO without losing my sftt.
Oh and those details of the trade work for me. I will ceasefire swap on my turn.
#349
Posted 10 November 2020 - 06:51 PM
Imperial Historian, on 10 November 2020 - 06:42 PM, said:
Blend, on 10 November 2020 - 06:31 PM, said:
IH - how would you feel about my coming in and taking Gral without you coming in behind and swiping Mehar Xull?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I'll post the trade of my racial for your SftT on this turn if you'll do the ceasefire swap on your next turn. Does that work for you?
I thought we'd already agreed that I'd take centauri gral, and that we would work out a deal once I'd scored the PO for you to move in and use gral to score?
I'm not keen on this and I could see this resulting in conflict. The path of my nascent saar ball pretty much has to go through that system. I'm happy to work out a deal where I leave it empty so you can move in later and score that PO without losing my sftt.
Yeah, I figured as much, just thought I'd see if it was something we could do - do you think you can actually score the PO this round if you take it? I would definitely move out of there next round and leave it to you, but if you absolutely must take it this round, then so be it, I'll stick to our agreement.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#350
Posted 10 November 2020 - 07:44 PM
@Twelve - did Tatts ever actually confirm he was accepting that trade? It's not the same as what he proposed previously.
#351
Posted 10 November 2020 - 07:46 PM
It amounts to the same thing and was my counter proposal but you are right. It isn't what he stated. I'm leaving it as is and if he pipes up to the contrary then I'll amend my post.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#352
Posted 10 November 2020 - 07:48 PM
twelve, on 10 November 2020 - 07:46 PM, said:
It amounts to the same thing and was my counter proposal but you are right. It isn't what he stated. I'm leaving it as is and if he pipes up to the contrary then I'll amend my post.
Yup, sounds good. I edited in the pillage assuming it'll stay unchanged as well.
#353
Posted 10 November 2020 - 07:49 PM
@Tatts - you've been ignoring me after my last reply to your suggestions. And now you've presumably agreed to trade all your commodities to Twelve. So are you still trading 2:2 with me, or was that all a big lie after all?
#354
Posted 10 November 2020 - 08:21 PM
It's been a slow progression today, I don't really wanna wait around another 6 hours for Tatts to get back and reply... IH, are you still up for washing my commodities? You could edit 0:2 into your turn and then I'll put 2:0 in mine right after?
#355
Posted 10 November 2020 - 08:25 PM
I'm here reading up.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#356
Posted 10 November 2020 - 08:29 PM
So so I am on 4 tgs after the deal with Twelve?
So Drek, I will wash your commodities only if you do not pillage. Otherwise there's no point.
I have not broken deals with you so far and acted in good faith.
So Drek, I will wash your commodities only if you do not pillage. Otherwise there's no point.
I have not broken deals with you so far and acted in good faith.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#357
Posted 10 November 2020 - 08:30 PM
twelve, on 10 November 2020 - 07:46 PM, said:
It amounts to the same thing and was my counter proposal but you are right. It isn't what he stated. I'm leaving it as is and if he pipes up to the contrary then I'll amend my post.
That's fine. Will you use my racial when I pop leadership next turn.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#358
Posted 10 November 2020 - 08:33 PM
Tattersail_, on 10 November 2020 - 08:29 PM, said:
So so I am on 4 tgs after the deal with Twelve?
Correct
Tattersail_, on 10 November 2020 - 08:29 PM, said:
So Drek, I will wash your commodities only if you do not pillage. Otherwise there's no point.
Agreed
Tattersail_, on 10 November 2020 - 08:29 PM, said:
I have not broken deals with you so far and acted in good faith.
Yup, the first two deals stand and they are being resolved to my satisfaction, and I hope yours.
Shame we couldn't work out a mutually beneficial third deal at this time, but I have no ill will from you trying to arrange one.
#359
#360
Posted 10 November 2020 - 09:34 PM
IH you have Zohbat listed in your planets do you mean starpoint?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.