Twilight Imperium VI: Revengeancest - Chat Thread
#1161
Posted 24 November 2020 - 03:55 PM
Has Twelve got 6 points or 5?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#1162
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:01 PM
Tattersail_, on 24 November 2020 - 03:55 PM, said:
Has Twelve got 6 points or 5?
6 according to his status phase post. Makes sense considering he scored 2 points this status phase and was at 4 points before.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#1163
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:16 PM
Drek is on 2 points. Weirdly Twelve could possibly win next round.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#1164
#1165
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:31 PM
Let us see what the new PO is before we discuss further.
Also @IH what does your Warfare Rider do?
Also @IH what does your Warfare Rider do?
#1166
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:35 PM
place a dreadnought in a system where I have ships (so spoiler it would be lazar sakulag)
#1167
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:35 PM
D, on 24 November 2020 - 04:31 PM, said:
Let us see what the new PO is before we discuss further.
Also @IH what does your Warfare Rider do?
Also @IH what does your Warfare Rider do?
Here you go:
Quote
You cannot vote on this agenda. Predict aloud an outcome of this agenda. If your prediction is correct, place 1 dreadnought from your reinforcements in a system that contains 1 or more of your ships.
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#1168
Posted 24 November 2020 - 04:39 PM
Thank you
#1169
#1170
#1171
Posted 24 November 2020 - 07:26 PM
I'd like to know what the new public objective is as well.
I don't know what I'm doing but it sounds good.
#1172
Posted 24 November 2020 - 08:24 PM
Yeah, the new PO could be something that looks very easy for one player to resolve but not the rest, for example, so that affects how we would want to vote. Like if it's a 2VP objective that only Tatts can likely fulfill anytime soon then I probably don't want to help him get a space dock this agenda phase that might be for the have 3 space docks SO on top of him having MR.
#1173
Posted 24 November 2020 - 08:53 PM
Fingers crossed for 2 techs in 4 colours!
There is no struggle too vast, no odds too overwhelming, for even should we fail - should we fall - we will know that we have lived. ~ Anomander Rake
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
My sig comes from a game in which I didn't heed Blend's advice. So maybe this time I should. ~ Khellendros
I'm just going to have to come to terms with the fact that self-vote suiciding will forever be referred to as "pulling a JPK" now, aren't I? ~ JPK
#1174
Posted 24 November 2020 - 08:58 PM
I don't have that SO and I only have one spacedock thanks to IH. I also am 4th pick so will not be getting Imperial and do not plan to next round anyway.
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#1176
Posted 25 November 2020 - 11:51 AM
Well that objective is a gimme for Tatts and D'rek
#1177
#1178
Posted 25 November 2020 - 11:53 AM
Depends if Blend wants to give you all those tgs aswel
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#1179
Posted 25 November 2020 - 01:09 PM
Yeah, that's an easy one for Tatts, Blend, and me.
Pushes Twelve heavily towards reclaiming Meer.
Pushes Twelve heavily towards reclaiming Meer.
#1180
Posted 25 November 2020 - 01:20 PM
Tattersail_, on 24 November 2020 - 11:33 AM, said:
Drek I will use all my votes towards you on the other agenda if you help my construction rider pass. I think you have 23 votes and I have 20. The rest have 21 votes between them I think.
I think you'll want the strategic token as it could come in clutch in later rounds.
If you vote 23 votes on that one it should go through barring any shenanigans.
If you do then I'll vote 20 on a planet of your choice for the other one.
I think you'll want the strategic token as it could come in clutch in later rounds.
If you vote 23 votes on that one it should go through barring any shenanigans.
If you do then I'll vote 20 on a planet of your choice for the other one.
Modification to this: I'll put 22 votes to myself for Arbiter, and 1 vote towards Rarron for Senate Sanctuary. You put all votes towards Rarron for Senate Sanctuary. (Otherwise they can all put their votes towards a planet for Senate Sanctuary, tie your 20 votes, and win it with Speaker resolving the tie.) Agreed?
(I fully expect they will play Bribery or Distinguished Councilor to win one of these anyway, but that's ok I want to bait those cards out sooner rather than later.)