TI4 Game 4C - Chat Thread
#3442
Posted 15 March 2020 - 09:15 PM
#3445
Posted 16 March 2020 - 09:22 AM
If the peace turtles move out of the way I should be able to take MR. The destroyer and neuroglaive makes the homeworld trickier.
Take good care to keep relations civil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
It's decent in the first of gentlemen
To speak friendly, Even to the devil
#3446
Posted 16 March 2020 - 09:25 AM
Morgoth, on 16 March 2020 - 09:22 AM, said:
If the peace turtles move out of the way I should be able to take MR. The destroyer and neuroglaive makes the homeworld trickier.
There’s no point taking MR if D’rek doesn’t spend any tokens.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3447
Posted 16 March 2020 - 09:30 AM
If Leadership is deployed before Diplomacy then no tokens can be taken from Rex. Are we still delaying that, or can we change plans? IH what are your thoughts?
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#3448
Posted 16 March 2020 - 09:33 AM
Tattersail_, on 16 March 2020 - 09:30 AM, said:
If Leadership is deployed before Diplomacy then no tokens can be taken from Rex. Are we still delaying that, or can we change plans? IH what are your thoughts?
She already has 6 tokens, so delaying that will change nothing.
Basicly she can now just wait for IH to do his job, Nom does his Job.
THen they make D'rek win.
#3449
Posted 16 March 2020 - 09:34 AM
If no one can stops D'rek, I suggest IH just takes his move against Torq/tequran.
Nom takes his move against Thibak.
And we crown D'rek "Winner"
Nom takes his move against Thibak.
And we crown D'rek "Winner"
#3450
Posted 16 March 2020 - 10:48 AM
Such negativity toaster.
I am fairly confident that between us we should be able to stop D'rek winning, her homeworld isn't that fortified and she does not have a lot of room for maneuver.
Leadership is inevitably going to be played after Diplomacy, there is no way to delay diplomacy or bring leadership forward that wouldn't result in Toaster winning.
I am fairly confident that between us we should be able to stop D'rek winning, her homeworld isn't that fortified and she does not have a lot of room for maneuver.
Leadership is inevitably going to be played after Diplomacy, there is no way to delay diplomacy or bring leadership forward that wouldn't result in Toaster winning.
#3451
Posted 16 March 2020 - 01:20 PM
Imperial Historian, on 16 March 2020 - 10:48 AM, said:
Such negativity toaster.
I am fairly confident that between us we should be able to stop D'rek winning, her homeworld isn't that fortified and she does not have a lot of room for maneuver.
Leadership is inevitably going to be played after Diplomacy, there is no way to delay diplomacy or bring leadership forward that wouldn't result in Toaster winning.
I am fairly confident that between us we should be able to stop D'rek winning, her homeworld isn't that fortified and she does not have a lot of room for maneuver.
Leadership is inevitably going to be played after Diplomacy, there is no way to delay diplomacy or bring leadership forward that wouldn't result in Toaster winning.
What negativity ? Everyone jus said they do not have a shot at attacking D'rek. Now that she also has Neuroglaive it got even harder.
Proof:
Morgoth -> Can't reach home world
Nom -> Occupied stopping me
yourself -> Occupied stopping me
Khell -> Got greedy and ruined her own chances and forces
Tatts -> Will loose sftt , in a war with Tapper
Tapper -> In a war with Tats
Twelve -> Barely has any forces on the board, No carrier in range
Toaster -> Locked down and assaulted from all sides, wormhole gone as well
So all this means is that you are going to score and win Before D'rek. Or you are on board with letting her finish this round.
#3452
Posted 16 March 2020 - 01:48 PM
I can see multiple ways to stop d'rek winning using the creuss wormhole and action cards creatively. It all depends on what d'rek decides to do after diplomacy though, so I'm not going to reveal to much until d'rek has taken her turn.
#3453
Posted 16 March 2020 - 03:19 PM
I resent ‘got greedy.’ I took a shot at the only chance I still had of winning the game, it didn’t work out. Oh well, win some, lose some.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3454
Posted 16 March 2020 - 03:32 PM
Khellendros, on 16 March 2020 - 03:19 PM, said:
I resent 'got greedy.' I took a shot at the only chance I still had of winning the game, it didn't work out. Oh well, win some, lose some.
That's not greed, that's just playing the game.
That's not greed, that's just playing the game.
I love how you are a girl
Fitting
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.
#3455
Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:18 PM
Imperial Historian, on 16 March 2020 - 01:48 PM, said:
I can see multiple ways to stop d'rek winning using the creuss wormhole and action cards creatively. It all depends on what d'rek decides to do after diplomacy though, so I'm not going to reveal to much until d'rek has taken her turn.
Your multiple ways to stop her is " winning before she does ", right ?
#3456
Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:20 PM
Khellendros, on 16 March 2020 - 03:19 PM, said:
I resent ‘got greedy.’ I took a shot at the only chance I still had of winning the game, it didn’t work out. Oh well, win some, lose some.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
I meant no insult , my apologies
To clarify, I am referring to the action cards draw. You called that greedy yourself if I remember right .
#3457
Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:36 PM
ToasTer86, on 16 March 2020 - 05:18 PM, said:
Imperial Historian, on 16 March 2020 - 01:48 PM, said:
I can see multiple ways to stop d'rek winning using the creuss wormhole and action cards creatively. It all depends on what d'rek decides to do after diplomacy though, so I'm not going to reveal to much until d'rek has taken her turn.
Your multiple ways to stop her is " winning before she does ", right ?
That is obviously my ultimate intent, but I was talking about taking her homeworld or forcing her to use a CT to stay in the game. Between twelve, morgoth and myself we should have enough ships and moves to leave her at the end of the round with either only 5ct keft or no homeworld. The details need to wait until she decides whether to use diplomacy or not as it changes the calculus.
Whether I'll be in a position to win considering yours and morgorths positions I don't know, but I'm certainly going to try and get as close to victory as I can.
#3458
Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:38 PM
ToasTer86, on 16 March 2020 - 05:20 PM, said:
Khellendros, on 16 March 2020 - 03:19 PM, said:
I resent ‘got greedy.’ I took a shot at the only chance I still had of winning the game, it didn’t work out. Oh well, win some, lose some.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
That’s not greed, that’s just playing the game.
I meant no insult , my apologies
To clarify, I am referring to the action cards draw. You called that greedy yourself if I remember right .
Oh yes, that was just dumb, agreed!
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3459
Posted 16 March 2020 - 05:41 PM
Tattersail_, on 16 March 2020 - 03:32 PM, said:
I think it’s due to my avatar, which I still haven’t changed since playing the Naalu (space snakes) in our last aborted game. Fitting with no explanation is a really odd thing for you to say :/
"I think I've made a terrible error of judgement."
#3460
Posted 16 March 2020 - 08:00 PM
Because you're a big girl *joke*
Apt is the only one who reads this. Apt is nice.